|
Volumn 29, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 518-519
|
Is nutrition support related to a poor prognosis in head and neck cancer patients? Thoughts about the secondary analysis of RTOG trial 90-03 [1]
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;
TUMOR MARKER;
ADVANCED CANCER;
ANEMIA;
CANCER CLASSIFICATION;
CANCER LOCALIZATION;
CANCER PREVENTION;
CANCER RADIOTHERAPY;
CANCER STAGING;
CANCER SURVIVAL;
CLINICAL STUDY;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
DIET THERAPY;
DISEASE SEVERITY;
HEAD AND NECK CANCER;
HUMAN;
INTERVENTION STUDY;
KARNOFSKY PERFORMANCE STATUS;
LETTER;
MALNUTRITION;
MEDICAL INFORMATION;
MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS;
OBSERVATIONAL STUDY;
PHYSICIAN;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PROGNOSIS;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
TREATMENT INDICATION;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNIVARIATE ANALYSIS;
CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL;
CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY);
DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL;
HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS;
HUMANS;
NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE);
PROGNOSIS;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;
|
EID: 34248340532
PISSN: 10433074
EISSN: 10970347
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1002/hed.20617 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (5)
|
References (5)
|