Does horse activate mother? Processing lexical tone in form priming

Language and Speech

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 101-123

  Lee, Chao Yang ^a  

^a OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Form priming; Lexical tone; Mandarin; Spoken word recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248338839     PISSN: 00238309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00238309070500010501     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. ANDRUSKI, J. E., BLUMSTEIN, S. E., & BURTON, M. (1994). The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access. Cognition, 52, 163-187.
2. CHEN, H.-C., & CUTLER, A. (1996). Auditory priming in spoken and printed word recognition. In H.-C. Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 77-81). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
3. CHING, Y. C. (1985). Lipreading Cantonese with voice pitch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 77, S39-40.
4. CONNINE, C. M., CLIFTON, C., Jr., & CUTLER, A. (1987). Effects of lexical stress on phonetic categorization. Phonetica, 44, 133-146.
5. COOPER, N., CUTLER, A., & WALES, R. (2002). Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence from native and non-native listeners. Language and Speech, 45, 207-228.
6. CUTLER, A. (1986). Forbear is a homophone: Lexical prosody does not constrain lexical access. Language and Speech, 29, 201-220.
7. CUTLER, A. (1997). The comparative perspective on spoken-language processing. Speech Communication, 21, 3-15.
8. th international Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 106-109. Stockholm.
9. CUTLER, A., & CHEN, H.-C. (1997). Lexical tone in Cantonese spoken word processing. Perception and Psychophysics, 59, 165-179.
10. CUTLER, A., DAHAN, D., & van DONSELAAR, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language and Speech, 40, 141-201.
11. CUTLER, A., & van DONSELAAR, W. (2001). Voornaam is not a homophone: Lexical prosody and lexical access in Dutch. Language and Speech, 44, 171-195.
12. CUTLER, A., & OTAKE, T. (1999). Pitch accent in spoken-word recognition in Japanese. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 1977-1988.
13. FOX, R. A., & UNKEFER, J. (1985). The effect of lexical status on the perception of tone. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 13, 69-90.
14. FRAUENFELDER, U. H. (1996). Computational models of spoken word recognition. In T. Dijkstra & K. de Smedt (Eds.), Computational psycholinguistics: AI and connectionist models of human language processing (pp. 114-138). London: Taylor and Francis.
15. GANDOUR, J. (1983). Tone perception in far eastern languages. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 149-175.
16. GANONG, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 110-125.
17. GOLDINGER, S. D. (1999). Only the Shadower knows: Comment on Hamburger and Slowiaczek (1996). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 347-351.
18. GOLDINGER, S. D., LUCE, P. A., PISONI, D. B., & MARCARIO, J. K. (1992). Form-based priming in spoken word recognition: The roles of competition and bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1211-1238.
19. HAMBURGER, M., & SLOWIACZEK, L. M. (1996). Phonological priming reflects lexical competition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 520-525.
20. HAMBURGER, M., & SLOWIACZEK, L. M. (1999). On the role of bias in dissociated phonological priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 352-355.
21. KIRILOFF, C. (1969). On the auditory perception of tones in Mandarin. Phonetica, 20, 63-67.
22. LIVELY, S. E., PISONI, D. B., & GOLDINGER, S. D. (1994). Spoken word recognition. Research and theory. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 265-301). San Diego: Academic Press.
23. LUCE, P. A., & PISONI, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The Neighborhood Activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1-36.
24. MARSLEN-WILSON, W. D. (1987). Functional parallelism in spoken word recognition. Cognition, 25, 71-102.
25. McCLELLAND, J. L., & ELMAN, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
26. McQUEEN, J. M. (1991). The influence of the lexicon on phonetic categorization: Stimulus quality in word-final ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 433-443.
27. McQUEEN, J. M., DAHAN, D., & CUTLER, A. (2003). Continuity and gradedness in speech processing. In N. O. Schiller & A. S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 39-78). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
28. MERTUS, J. A. (2000). The Brown Lab Interactive Speech System (BLISS). Providence: Brown University.
29. MONSELL, S., & HIRSH, K. W. (1998). Competitor priming in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1495-1520.
30. NORRIS, D. G. (1994). SHORTLIST: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234.
31. NORRIS, D., McQUEEN, J. M., & CUTLER, A. (2002). Bias effects in facilitatory phonological priming. Memory & Cognition, 30, 399-411.
32. PACKARD, J. L. (2000). The morphology of Chinese: A linguistic and cognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. RADEAU, M., MORAIS, J., & DEWIER, A. (1989). Phonological priming in spoken word recognition: Task effects. Memory & Cognition, 17, 525-535.
34. RADEAU, M., MORAIS, J., & SEGUI, J. (1995). Phonological priming between monosyllabic spoken words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1297-1311.
35. SCHIRMER, A., TANG, S.-L., PENNEY, T. B., GUNTER, T. C., & CHEN, H.-C. (2005). Brain responses to segmentally and tonally induced semantic violations in Cantonese. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1-12.
36. SLOWIACZEK, L. M., & HAMBURGER, M. (1992). Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1239-1250.
37. SLOWIACZEK, L. M., & PISONI, D. B. (1986). Effects of phonological similarity on priming in auditory lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 14, 230-237.
38. SOTO-FARACO, S., SEBASTIAN-GALLES, N., & CUTLER, A. (2001). Segmental and suprasegmental mismatch in lexical access. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 412-432.
39. UTMAN, J. A., BLUMSTEIN, S. E., & SULLIVAN, K. (2001). Mapping from sound to meaning: Reduced lexical activation in Broca's aphasies. Brain and Language, 79, 444-472.
40. WANG, H. (1986). A frequency dictionary of Modern Chinese. Beijing: Beijing Language Institute Press.
41. YE, Y., & CONNINE, C. M. (1999). Processing spoken Chinese: The role of tone information. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 609-630.
42. YIP, M., LEUNG, P.-Y., & CHEN, H.-C. (1998). Phonological similarity effects in Cantonese spoken-word processing. Proceedings of ICSLP'98, 5, 2139-2142. Sydney, Australia.
43. YIP, M. (2001). Phonological priming in Cantonese spoken-word processing. Psychologia, 44, 223-229.
44. ZHOU, X., & MARSLEN-WILSON, W. (1994). Words, morphemes and syllables in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 393-422.
45. ZHOU, X., & MARSLEN-WILSON, W. (1995). Morphological structure in the Chinese mental lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 545-600.
46. ZWITSERLOOD, P. (1996). Form priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 589-596.