In the mirror of the justices: Sources of greatness on the Supreme Court

Political Behavior

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 1988, Pages 247-266

  Caldeira, Gregory A ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248301022     PISSN: 01909320     EISSN: 15736687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00990554     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. “A bench happily filled”: Some historical reflections on the Supreme Court appointment process
2. Rating Supreme Court justices
3. Galton's “Hereditary Genius” and the three following generations since 1869
4. Is competence related to majority opinion assignment on the United States Supreme Court?
5. Law and literature
6. A judicial all-star nine
7. The geographic factor in appointments to the United States Supreme Court, 1789–1976
8. The Supreme Court and its caseload
9. The dissenting opinion: Its use and abuse
10. What makes a great justice? Mr. Justice Bradley and the Supreme Court, 1870–1892
11. The Supreme Court in the mirror of the justices
12. Leadership
13. Judicial selection and the qualities that make a “good” judge
14. American judges: Their selection, tenure, variety, and quality
15. The all-time all-star all-era Supreme Court
16. The Supreme Court selection process: Presidential motivations and judicial performance
17. Oliver Wendell Holmes: The ebb and flow of judicial legendry
18. An analysis of presidential greatness of “presidential rating.”
19. Measurement of social choice and interpersonal attractiveness
20. The evaluation of presidents: An extension of the Schlesinger polls
21. The presidential performance study: A progress report
22. Characteristics of Supreme Court greatness
23. The justices of the Supreme Court: A collective portrait
24. The judicial ten: America's greatest judges
25. Biographical determinants of achieved eminence: A multivariate approach to the Cox data
26. Presidential greatness and performance: Can we predict leadership in the White House?
27. Intergenerational transfer of individual difference in hereditary monarchs: Genes, role-modeling, cohort, or sociocultural effects?
28. The equality principle and majority opinion assignment on the United States Supreme Court
29. The chief justice and self-assignment of majority opinions: A research note
30. Selection of capable justices: factors to consider
31. Division of opinion of the Supreme Court: A history of judicial disintegration