The U.S. congress and American federalism: Are ‘Subnational’ governments protected?

Political Research Quarterly

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 1989, Pages 93-106

  Hero, Rodney E ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248294709     PISSN: 10659129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/106591298904200108     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Chubb, John. 1985. “The Political Economy of Federalism.” American Political Science Review 79, 4 (December): 99-1015.
2. Conlan, Timothy. 1985. “Federalism and Competing Values in the Reagan Administration.” In Laurence J. O'Toole, Jr., ed., American Intergovernmental Relations, pp. 265-80. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
3. Derthick, Martha. 1986. “Preserving Federalism: Congress, the States, and the Supreme Court.” The Brookings Review Winter/Spring: 32-37.
4. Diamond, Martin. 1985. “What the Framers Meant by Federalism.” In Laurence J. O'Toole, Jr., ed., American Intergovernmental Relations, pp. 28-35. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
5. Elazar, Daniel J. 1984. American Federalism: A View From the States, 3rd ed. New York: Harper and Row.
6. Elazar, Daniel J. 1981. “Is Federalism Compatible with Prefectoral Administration ?” Publius 11, 2 (Spring): 3-22.
7. Hero, Rodney E. 1987a. “The U.S. Senate and Federalism Policy in the 96th and 97th Congresses.” Publius 17, 2 (Spring): 105-13.
8. Hero, Rodney E. 1987b. “Senate and House Voting on Federalism Issues: An Analysis of Two Recent Congresses” Unpublished paper.
9. Hero, Rodney E. 1987c. “Contemporary Perspectives on American Federalism: A Framework and an Application.” Unpublished paper.
10. Kettl, Donald F. 1983. The Regulation of American Federalism. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
11. Meese, Edwin III. 1987. “Taking Federalism Seriously.” Intergovernmental Perspective 13, 1 (Winter): 8-10.
12. Nice, David C. 1983. “An Intergovernmental Perspective on Urban Fragmentation.” Social Science Quarterly 64, 1 (March): 111-18.
13. Patterson, Samuel C., and Gregory A. Caldeira. 1984. “The Etiology of Partisan Competition.” American Political Science Review 78 (September): 691-707.
14. Peterson, Paul, Barry G. Rabe, and Kenneth K. Wong. 1986. When Federalism Works. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.
15. Peterson, Paul. 1981. City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Reagan, Michael, and John G. Sanzone. 1981. The New Federalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Riker, William H. 1985. “Federalism.” In Laurence J. O'Toole, Jr., ed., American Intergovernmental Relations, pp. 67-72. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
18. Riker, William H. 1955. “The Senate and American Federalism.” American Political Science Review 49 (June): 452-68.
19. Rothman, Rozann. 1978. “The Ambiguity of American Federal Theory.” Publius 8: 103-22.
20. Schechter, Stephen. 1983. “Federalism in the 97th Congress.” Publius 13 (Spring): 97-128.
21. Schechter, Stephen. 1981. “Federalism in the 96th Congress.” Publius 11 (Summer): 155-92.
22. Stone, Clarence N. 1980. “Systemic Power in Community Decision Making: A Restatement of Stratification Theory.” American Political Science Review 74, 4 (December): 978-90.
23. Thomas, Robert D. 1986. “Cities as Partners in the Federal System.” Political Science Quarterly 101, 1: 49-64.
24. Walker, David B. 1981. Toward a Functioning Federalism. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.
25. Wirt, Frederick. 1985. “The Dependent City? External Influences Upon Local Control.” Journal of Politics 47, 1 (February): 83-112.
26. Wright, Deil S. 1982. Understanding Intergovernmental Relations, 2nd ed. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.