An innovative, effective and cost effective survey method using a survey-check response format

Prevention Science

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 133-140

  Feil, Edward G ^a   Severson, Herbert ^a   Taylor, Ted K ^a   Boles, Shawn ^a   Albert, David A ^b   Blair, Jason ^a  

^a OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Paticipant engagement; Recruitment methods; Survey methods

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MASS COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT SELECTION; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DATA COLLECTION; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HUMANS; PATIENT SELECTION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34248230791     PISSN: 13894986     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11121-006-0060-3     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Albert, D., Ward, A., Ahluwalia, K., & Sadowsky, D. (2002). Addressing tobacco in managed care: A survey of dentists' knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. American Journal of Public Health, 92(6), 997-1001.
2. Armstrong, S. J., & Lusk, Edward, J. (1987). Return postage in mail surveys a meta-analysis. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 51(2) 233-248.
3. Burns, G. L., Taylor, T. K., & Rusby, J. (2001). Child and Adolescent Disruptive Behavior Inventory-Version 2.3. Pullman, WA: Author.
4. Burns, G. L., Walsh, J. A., Patterson, D. R., Holte, C. S., Sommers-Flanagan, R., & Parker, C. M. (1997). Internal validity of the disruptive behavior disorder symptoms: Implications from parent ratings for a dimensional approach to symptom validity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 25(4), 307-319.
5. Choi, B. C., Pak, A. W., & Purdham, J. T. (1990). Effects on mailing strategies on response rate, response time and cost in a questionnaire study among nurses. Epidemiology, 1(1), 72-74.
6. Church, A. H. (1993). Estimating the Effect of Incentives On Mail Survey Response Rates: A Meta-Analysis. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 57 (1) 62-79.
7. Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd Ed.).John Wiley & Sons: New York.
8. Everett, S. A., Price, J. H., Bedell, A. W., Telljohann, S. K. (1997). The effect of monetary incentive in increasing the return rate of a survey to family physicians. Evaluations and the Health Professions, 20(2), 207-214.
9. Fox, R., Crask, M., & Kim, J. (1988). Mailm Survey Response Rate: A Meta-Analysis of Selected Techniques For Inducing Response. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 52(4), 467-491.
10. Gendall, P., Hoek, J., & Brennan, M. (1998). The tea bag experiment: more evidence on incentives in mail surveys. Journal of the Market Research Society, 40(4), 347-351.
11. Hopkins, K. D., & Gullickson, A. R. (1992). Response Rates in Survey Research: A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Monetary Gratuities. Journal of Experimental Education, 61(1), 52-62.
12. James, J. M., & Bolstein, R. (1992). Large Monetary Incentives and Their Effect on Mail Survey Response Rates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 442-453.
13. Martinez-Ebers, V. ( 1997). Using Monetary Incentives with Hard to Reach Populations in Panel Surveys. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9(1), 77-86.
14. Mizes, J. S., Fleece, E. L., & Roos, C. (1984). Incentives for increasing return rates: Magnitude levels, response bias, and format. Public Opinion Quarterly, 48, 794-800.
15. Oden, L., Price, J. H. (1999). Effects of a small monetary incentive and follow-up mailings on return rates of a survey to nurse practitioners. Psychological Reports, 85(3, pt2), 1154-1156.
16. Webster-Stratton, C. (1984). Randomized trial of two parent-training programs for families with conduct-disordered children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 666-678.
17. Webster-Stratton, C. (2000). The Incredible Years Training Series. OJJDP Juvenile Justice Bulletin Review. US Department of Justice. John Wilson, Administrator.