Sexual size dimorphism in henna-capped foliage-gleaner Hylocryptus rectirostris (Wied) (Aves, Furnariidae);Dimorfismo sexual de tamanho no fura-barreira Hylocryptus rectirostris (Wied) (Aves, Furnariidae)

Revista Brasileira de Zoologia

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 207-212

  Faria, Luciene P ^a   Carrara, Lucas A ^a   Rodrigues, Marcos ^b  

^a Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais ^*  (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Morphometric; Sexing; Tail; Territory; Wing

Indexed keywords

AVES; FURNARIIDAE; HYLOCRYPTUS RECTIROSTRIS; LAWSONIA INERMIS;

EID: 34248210101     PISSN: 01018175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-81752007000100027     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. ANCIÃES, M. & S.N. DEL LAMA. 2002. Sex identification of pintailed manakins (Ilicura militaris: pipridae) using the polymerase chain reaction and its application to behavioral studies. Ornitologia Neotropical 13: 159-165.
2. BIERREGAARD, R.O.J. 1988. Morphological data from understory birds in terra firme forest in the central amazonian basin. Revista Brasileira Biologia 48 (2): 169-178.
3. BLANCKENHORN, W.U. 2005. Behavioral causes and consequences of sexual size dimorphism. Ethology 111: 977-1016.
4. BROWN, L. & D. AMADON. 1968. Eagles, hawks and falcons of the world. New York, Macgraw-Hill, 945p.
5. CAPARROZ, R.; C.Y. MIYAKI; M.I. BAMPI & A. WAJNTAL. 2001. Analysis of the genetic variability in a sample of the remaining group of Spix's Macaw (Cyanopsitta spixii, Psittaciformes: Aves) by DNA fingerprinting. Biological Conservation 99 (3): 307-311.
6. EVANS, M.R.; M.L. ROSÉN; K.J. PARK & A. HEDENSTRO. 2001. How do birds' tails work? Delta-wing theory fails to predict tail shape during flight. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269: 1053-1057.
7. nd ed., 150p.
8. FRAGA, R.M. 1980. The breeding of rufous horneros (Furnarius rufus). Condor 82: 58-68.
9. GRIFFITHS, R.; M.C. DOUBLE; K. ORR & R.J.G. DAWSON. 1998. A DNA test to sex most birds. Molecular Ecology 7: 1071-1075.
10. KILHAN, L. 1970. Feeding behavior of downy woodpeckers. I preference for paper birches and sexual differences. The Auk 87: 544-556.
11. MARANTZ, C.A.; A. ALEIXO; L.R. BEVIER & M.A. PATTEN 2003. Family Dendrocolaptidae (woodcreepers), p. 358-447. In: J. DEL HOYO; A. ELLIOTT & D.A. CHRISTIE. (Eds). Handbook of the birds of the world. Barcelona, Lynx Edicions, vol. 8, 845p.
12. MORENO, E. & A.P. MOLLER. 1996. Morphological aspects of avian tail movements: a functional approach in hirundines. The Auk 113 (3): 647-654.
13. NORBERG, U.M. 1990. Vertebrate flight. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, IX+291p.
14. POUGH, F.H. 1999. A vida dos vertebrados. São Paulo, Atheneu Editora, 798p.
15. QUINTANA, F.; G. SOMOZA; M. UHART; C. CASSARÁ; P. GANDINI & E. FRERE. 2003. Sex determination of adult Rock Shags by molecular sexing and morphometric parameters. Journal Field Ornithology 74 (4): 370-375.
16. RAYNER, J.M. 1988. Form and functionin avian flight, p. 1-66. In: R.J. JONHSTON (Ed). Current ornithology. New York, Plenum, vol. 5, 344p.
17. REMSEN, J.V. 2003. Family Furnariidae (ovenbirds), p. 162-357. In: J. DEL HOYO; A. ELLIOTT & D.A. CHRISTIE. (Eds). Handbook of the birds of the world. Barcelona, Lynx Edicions, vol. 8, 845p.
18. RIBEIRO, J.F. & B.M.T. WALTER. 1998. Fitofisionomias do bioma cerrado, p. 89-166. In: Sano, S.M. e Almeida, S.P. (Eds) Cerrado: Ambiente e Flora. Planaltina, Embrapa, 556p.
19. RIDGELY, R.S. & G. TURDOR. 1994. The birds of South America. Oxford, Oxford University Press, vol. 2, 814p.
20. RODRIGUES, M. & L. CARRARA 2004. Co-operative breeding in the rufous-fronted thornbird Phacellodomus rufifrons: a Neotropical ovenbird. Ibis 146: 351-354.
21. RODRIGUES, M.; L. CARRARA; L. FARIA & H. GOMES. 2005. Aves do Parque Nacional da Serra do Cipó: o Vale do Rio Cipó. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 22 (2): 326-338.
22. RYDER, T.B. & R. DURÃES. 2005. It's not easy being green: using molt and morphological criteria to age and sex greenplumage manakins (Aves: Pipridae). Ornitologia Neotropical 16: 481-491.
23. SAMBROOK, J.; E.F. FRITSCH & T. MANIATIS. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. New York, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, XXV+999p.
24. SANTOS, F.R.; N.O. BIANCHI & S.D. PENA. 1996. Worldwide distribution of human Y-chromosome haplotypes. Genome Research 6: 601-611.
25. SÃO PAULO. Secretaria do Meio Ambiente. 1998. Fauna ameaçada no estado de São Paulo. São Paulo, Documentos Ambientais, Série Probio, 56p.
26. SICK, H. 1997. Ornitologia Brasileira. Rio de Janeiro, Editora Nova Fronteira, 862p.
27. SILVA, J.M.C. 1995. Birds of the Cerrado Region, South America. Steenstrupia 21 (2): 69-92.
28. STOTZ, D.F.; J.W. FITZPATRICK; T.A. PARKER III & D.K. MOSKOVITS. 1996. Neotropical birds: ecology and conservation. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 478p.
29. VIELLIARD, J. & W.R. SILVA. 2001. Avifauna de mata ciliar, p. 169-185. In: R.R. RODRIGUES & H.F.L. FILHO. Matas ciliares: conservação e recuperação. São Paulo, Editora da Universidade de São Paulo, Fapesp, 320p.
30. WEBSTER, S.M. 1997. Extreme sexual size dimorphism, sexual selection, and the foraging ecology of montezuma oropendolas. The Auk 114 (4): 570-580.
31. WILLIS, E.O. 1972. The behavior of plain-brown woodcreepers, Dendrocincla fuliginosa. The Wilson Bulletin 84 (4): 377-420.
32. WINKLER, H. & B. LEISLER. 1985. Mophological aspects of habitat selection in birds, p. 415-334. In: M.L. CODY (Ed). Habitat selection in birds. San Diego, Academic Press, 558p.
33. WINKER, K.; G.A. VOELKER & J.T. KLICKA. 1994. A morphometric examination of sexual dimorphism in the Hylophilus, Xenops, and an Automolus from southern Veracruz, México. Journal Field Ornithology 65 (3): 307-323.
34. ZYSKOWSKI, K. & R.O. PRUM. 1999. Phylogenetic analysis of the nest architecture of neotropical ovenbirds (Furnariidae). The Auk 116 (4): 891-911.