Noninvitation of eligible individuals to participate in pediatric studies a qualitative study

Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

Volumn 161, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 446-450

  Amiel, Philippe ^a   Moreau, Delphine ^b   Vincent Genod, Claire ^c   Alberti, Corinne ^b   Hankard, Régis ^b   Ravaud, Philippe ^c,d   Gottot, Serge ^c   Gaultier, Claude ^b  

^a INSTITUT GUSTAVE ROUSSY   (France)

^b HÔPITAL ROBERT DEBRÉ   (France)

^c BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

^d Biostatistique et Recherche Clinique   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONTROLLED STUDY; FRANCE; HUMAN; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; METHODOLOGY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TEACHING HOSPITAL;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIALS; DECISION MAKING; DRUG EVALUATION; FEMALE; HOSPITALS, PEDIATRIC; HOSPITALS, TEACHING; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; MALE; PARIS; PATIENT SELECTION; PEDIATRICS; PERCEPTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE; SELECTION BIAS;

EID: 34248209557     PISSN: 10724710     EISSN: 15383628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.161.5.446     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Regulations requiring manufacturers to assess the safety and effectiveness of new drugs and biological products in pediatric patients. Final rule: Food and Drug Administration. Fed Regist. 1998;63:66631-66672.
2. Council Resolution of 14 December 2000 on paediatric medicinal products (2001/C 17/01). Official Journal of the European Communities. January 19, 2001. http: //eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/oj/2001/c_017/ c_01720010119en00010001 .pdf. Accessed October 31, 2006.
3. Saint Raymond A, Brasseur D. Development of medicines for children in Europe: ethical implications. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2005;6:45-51.
4. Hoppu K. Patient recruitment: European perspective. Pediatrics. 1999;104: 623-626.
5. Fogas BS, Oesterheld JR, Shader RI. A retrospective study of children's perceptions of participation as clinical research subjects in a minimal risk study. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2001;22:211-216.
6. Bernhardt BA, Tambor ES, Fraser G, Wissow LS, Geller G. Parents' and children's attitudes toward the enrollment of minors in genetic susceptibility research: implications for informed consent. Am J Med Genet A. 2003;116:315-323.
7. Crozier M, Friedberg E. Organizations and collective action: our contribution to organizational analysis. Res Sociol Organ. 1995;13:71-92.
8. Greenhalgh T, Taylor R. How to read a paper: papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). BMJ. 1997;315:740-743.
9. Amiel P, Mathieu S, Fagot-Largeault A. Acculturating human experimentation: an empirical survey in France. J Med Philos. 2001;26:285-298.
10. Miles M, Hubermann A. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Handbook. 2nd ed. London, England: Sage Publications; 1994.
11. Rothman KJ. Declaration of Helsinki should be strengthened. BMJ. 2000;321: 442-445.
12. World Medical Association (WMA) Declaration of Helsinki. Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects, adopted by the 18th World Medical Assembly, Helsinki, Finland, June 1964, and amended by the 29th WMA, Tokyo, Japan, Oct 1975; 35th WMA, Venice, Italy, Oct 1983; 41st WMA, Hong Kong, Sep 1989; 48th General Assembly, Somerset West, Republic of South Africa, Oct 1996; 52nd General Assembly, Edinburgh, Oct 2000; art. 6. http://www.wma.net. Accessed February 26, 2007.
13. Caldwell PH, Butnow PN, Craig JC. Parent's attitudes to children's participation in randomized controlled trials. J Pediatr. 2003;142:554-559.
14. Kuzel AJ. Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In: Crabtree BE, Miller WL, eds. Doing Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1992:31-34. Research Methods for Primary Care Series.
15. Morse JL, ed. Qualitative Nursing Research: A Contemporary Dialogue. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1992.
16. LEEM (Les Enterprises du Médicament). Ranking of France in international clinical research: results of 2004 survey [in French]. 2004. http://www.extranet.leem.org//UploadPublic/2005/ Enqueteetudecliniqueattractivit%E92004.pdf. Accessed October 31, 2006.
17. Lengacher CA, Gonzalez LL, Giuliano R, Bennett MP, Cox CE, Reintgen DS. The process of clinical trials: a model for successful clinical trial participation. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001;28:1115-1120.
18. Benson AB III, Pregler JP, Bean JA, Rademaker AW, Eshler B, Anderson K. Oncologists' reluctance to accrue patients onto clinical trials: an Illinois Cancer Center study. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9:2067-2075.
19. Garfinkel H. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International Inc; 1967.
20. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for Research Involving Human Subjects. Washington, DC: Dept of Health, Education, and Welfare. 1978. http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont. html. Accessed February 26, 2007.
21. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. JAMA. 1996;276:637-639.
22. Altman DG. Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors. BMJ. 2005;330:1056-1057.
23. Mapstone J, Elbourne D, Roberts I. Strategies to improve recruitment to research studies (protocol for a Cochrane review). Cochrane Database Methodology Rev. 2002;(3):MR000013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000013.pub2.