Developmental change in notetaking during scientific inquiry

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1035-1058

  Garcia Mila, Merce ^a   Andersen, Christopher ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248194114     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500690600931103     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. (1987) The psychology of written composition, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
2. Bolger, F. and Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1990) The development of communicative competence: Are notational systems like language?. Archives de Psychologie, 58, pp. 257-273.
3. Britton, J. (1982) Shaping at the point of utterance. Prospect and retrospect: Selected essays of James Britton, pp. 139-145. Boynton/Cook, Montclair, NJ
4. Cheng, P. and Novick, L. (1992) Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99, pp. 365-382.
5. Chinn, C. A. and Brewer, W. (2001) Models of data: A theory of how people evaluate data. Cognition and Instruction, 19, pp. 323-393.
6. Cohen, S. R. (1985) The development of constraints on symbol-meaning structure in notation: Evidence from production, interpretation, and forced-choice judgments. Child Development, 56, pp. 177-195.
7. Garcia-Mila, M., Andersen, C. and Rojo, N. E. Representational practices and scientific inquiry. Representational systems and practices as learning tools in different fields of knowledge, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
8. Hand, B. M., Alvermann, D. E., Gee, J., Guzzetti, B. J., Norris, S. P., Phillips, L. M., Prain, V. and Yore, L. D. (2003) Message from the "Island Group": What is literacy in science literacy?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, pp. 607-615.
9. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1979) Micro- and macrodevelopmental changes in language acquisition and other representational systems. Cognitive Science, 3, pp. 91-117.
10. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1984) Children's problem solving. Advances in developmental psychology, 3, pp. 39-90. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
11. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992) Beyond modularity. A developmental perspective on cognitive science, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
12. Keys, C. W. (1999) Language as an indicator of meaning generation: An analysis of middle school students' written discourse about scientific investigations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, pp. 1044-1061.
13. Keys, C. W. (1999) Revitalizing instruction scientific genres: Connecting knowledge production with writing in science. Science Education, 83, pp. 115-130.
14. Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V. and Collins, S. (1999) Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, pp. 1065-1084.
15. Klaczynski, P. (2000) Motivated scientific reasoning biases, epistemological beliefs, and theory polarization: A two-process approach to adolescent cognition. Child Development, 71, pp. 1347-1366.
16. Klahr, D. (2000) Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
17. Klahr, D. and Dunbar, K. (1988) Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12, pp. 1-55.
18. Klein, P. D. (1999) Reopening inquiry into cognitive processes in Writing-to-Learn. Educational Psychology Review, 11, pp. 203-270.
19. Klein, P. D. (2000) Elementary students' strategies for writing-to-learn in science. Cognition & Instruction, 18, pp. 317-348.
20. Kuhn, D. (1989) Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96, pp. 674-689.
21. Kuhn, D. (1995) Microgenetic study of change: What has it told us?. Psychological Science, 6, pp. 133-139.
22. Kuhn, D. (2001) Why development does (and doesn't) occur: Evidence from the domain of inductive reasoning. Mechanisms of cognitive development: Neural and behavioral perspectives, pp. 221-252. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
23. Kuhn, D. (2002) A multi-component system that constructs knowledge: Insights from microgenetic study. Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning, pp. 109-131. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
24. Kuhn, D. (2005) Education for thinking, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
25. Kuhn, D., Amsel, E. and Loughlin, M. O' (1988) The development of scientific thinking skills, Academic Press, San Diego, CA
26. Kuhn, D., Garcia-Mila, M., Zohar, A. and Andersen, C. (1995) Strategies of knowledge acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60:4, pp. 1-127.
27. Kuhn, D. and Pearsall, S. (1998) Relations between metastrategic knowledge and strategic performance. Cognitive Development, 13, pp. 227-247.
28. Kuhn, D., Schauble, L. and Garcia-Mila, M. (1992) Cross-domain development of scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 9, pp. 285-327.
29. Lee, K. and Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1996) The development of cognitive constraints on notations. Archives de Psychologie, 64, pp. 3-26.
30. Lehrer, R., Schauble, L., Carpenter, S. and Penner, D. (2000) The interrelated development of inscriptions and conceptual understanding. Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms. Perspectives on discourse, tools and instructional design, pp. 325-361. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
31. Lemke, J. (2002) Enseñar todos los lenguajes de la ciencia: Palabras, símbolos, imágenes y acciones. La educación en ciencias. Ideas para mejorar su práctica, pp. 159-186. Paidós, Barcelona, Spain
32. Meacham, J. A. and Leiman, B. (1982) Remembering to perform future actions. Memory observed, Freeman, New York
33. Moshman, D. (1998) Cognitive development beyond childhood. Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, language and perception, pp. 947-978. Wiley, New York
34. National Center for Education Statistics (1997) National assessment of educational progress, 1996 summary data tables, Author, Washington, DC
35. Rivard, L. P. (1994) A review of writing to learn in science: Implications for practice and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, pp. 969-983.
36. Schauble, L., Klopfer, L. E. and Raghavan, K. (1991) Students' transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, pp. 859-882.
37. Siegler, R. S. (1996) Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinking, Oxford University Press, New York
38. Siegler, R. S. and Crowley, K. (1991) The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46, pp. 606-620.
39. Siegler, R. S., Liebert, D. E. and Liebert, R. M. (1973) Inhelder and Piaget's pendulum problem. Teaching preadolescents to act as scientists. Developmental Psychology, 9, pp. 97-101.
40. U.S. Census Bureau (2000) Census 2000, Summary file 3 (SF 3)
41. Zimmerman, C. (2000) The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20, pp. 99-149.
42. Zimmerman, C. (2005) The development of scientific reasoning skills: What psychologists contribute to an understanding of elementary science learning, National Research Council, Washington, DC