Policy determinants affect telehealth implementation

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 100-107

  Schmeida, Mary ^a   McNeal, Ramona ^b   Mossberger, Karen ^c  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT SPRINGFIELD   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

GOVERNMENT RESOURCES; HEALTH POLICY; PROFESSIONALISM; STALE LEGISLATORS; TELEHEALTH;

TELEMEDICINE;

ARTICLE; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; LAW; NURSING CARE DELIVERY SYSTEM; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONALISM; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TELEHEALTH;

EID: 34248173052     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2006.0017     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Moore R. Telehealth programs - introducing the basics. PSQH 2005; Jan/Feb:45-47.
2. US Department of Commerce. Innovation, demand and investment in telehealth. Available at http://www.hrsa.gov/telehealth/publications.htm, 2005. Last accessed June 30, 2006.
3. Heinzelmann P, Lugn N, Kvedar J. Telemedicine in the future. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11:384-390.
4. Schmeida M. Telehealth innovation in the American states [Dissertation]. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest, 2005.
5. House of Representatives 2157. Rural health care improvement act of 2001. 107th Congress 1st Session, 2001.
6. West D. E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. J Public Admin Rev 2004;64:15-27.
7. West D. State and federal e-government in the United States. Available at http://www.insidepolitics.org/egovt03us.pdf/, 2003. Last accessed June 20, 2006.
8. Thomas J, Streib G. The new face of government: citizen-initiated contacts in the era of e-government. J Public Admin Res Theor 2003;13:83-102.
9. West D. Digital government: technology and public sector performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.
10. National Conference of State Legislatures. Using technology to communicate with citizens. Available at http://www.ncsl.org/programs/lis/cip/ lit.htm#Technology, 2005. Last accessed March 1, 2006.
11. Telemedicine Information Exchange. Telemedicine programs database. Available at http://tie.telemed. org/programs/, 2004. Last accessed March 10, 2005.
12. McNeal R, Tolbert C, Mossberger K, Dotterweich L. Innovating in digital government in the American states. SSQ 2003;84:52-70.
13. Downs G, Rocke D. Bureaucracy and juvenile corrections. In: Dye TR, Grey V, eds. The determinants of public policy. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1980.
14. Derthick M. The influence of federal grants in public assistance in Massachusetts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.
15. Schmeida M. Telehealth and state government policy. Encyclopedia of public administration and public policy. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2004.
16. Walker J. The diffusion of innovation among the American states. APSR 1969;63:880-899.
17. Grupp F, Richards R. Variations in elite perceptions of American states as referents for public policy making. APSR 1975;69:850-858.
18. Rogers E. Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: The Freedom Press, 1995.
19. Mooney C, Lee M. Legislating morality in the American states: the case of pre-Roe abortion regulation reform. AJPS 1995;39:599-627.
20. Clinton W, Gore A. Technology for America's economic growth, a new direction to build economic strength. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1993.
21. Schmeida M. State government policy initiatives: improving access for the medically underserved. Encyclopedia of public administration and public policy. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 2006.
22. Haider-Markel D. Policy diffusion as a geographical expansion of the scope of political conflict: same sex marriage bans in the 1990's. SPPQ 2001;1:5-26.
23. Schmeida M. State mental-health parity mandates. J Addiction Nurs 2001;13:95-108.
24. Downs G, Mohr L. Conceptual issues in the study of innovation. Adm Sci Q 1976;21:700-714.
25. Rice R, Rogers E. Reinvention in the innovation process. Knowledge 1980;1:499-514.
26. Lester J, Franke J, Bowman A, Kramer K. Hazardous wastes, politics, and public policy: a comparative state analysis. West Pol Q 1983;36:257-281.
27. Meier K. The politics of sin: drugs, alcohol and public policy. Armonk, NY: Sharpe, 1994.
28. Telemedicine Information Exchange. Telemedicine programs database. Available at http://tie.telemed. org/programs/, 2003. Last accessed March 10, 2005.
29. US Census Bureau. Statistical abstracts in the United States. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2000.
30. US Census Bureau. Statistical abstracts in the United States. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2003.
31. Centers for Disease Control. Health, United States, 2003. Available at http://www.//cdc.gov/, 2003. Last accessed February 1, 2005.
32. Squire P. The theory of legislative institutionalization and the California assembly. J Politics 1992;54: 1026-1054.
33. Holbrook T, Van Dunk E. Electoral competition in the American states. Am Political Sci Rev 1993;87:955-962.
34. US Census Bureau. Statistical abstracts in the United States. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2001.
35. Goggin M, Bowman A, Lester J, O'Toole L. Implementation theory and practice: Toward a third generation. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman and Company, 1990.
36. US Census Bureau. Statistical abstracts in the United States. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1995.
37. US Census Bureau. Statistical abstracts in the United States. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2002.
38. US Census Bureau. Statistical abstracts in the United States. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1997.
39. US Census Bureau. Statistical abstracts in the United States. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 2004.
40. Beck N, Katz J. What to do (and not to do) with time-series-cross- sectional data in comparative politics. APSR 1995;89:634-647.
41. Erickson R, Wright G, McIver J. Political parties, public opinion, and state policy in the United States. APSR 1989;83:729-750.
42. Gray V, Hanson R, Jacob H. Politics in the American states a comparative analysis. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1999.
43. Gray V. Innovations in the states: a diffusion study. APSR 1973;67:1174-1185.
44. Harnett B. Telemedicine systems and telecommunications. J Telemed Telecare 2006;12:4-15.
45. Mossberger K, Tolbert C, Stansbury M. Virtual inequality beyond the digital divide. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2003.
46. Lowi T. Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. J Public Admin Rev 1972;33:298-310.