|
Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 24-30
|
Comparing outcomes on peritoneal and hemodialysis: a case study in the interpretation of observational studies.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
EDITORIAL;
HUMAN;
KIDNEY DISEASE;
METHODOLOGY;
MORTALITY;
OBSERVATION;
PATIENT ATTITUDE;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PERITONEAL DIALYSIS;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SAMPLE SIZE;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
SURVIVAL;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL;
HUMANS;
KIDNEY DISEASES;
OBSERVATION;
PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE;
PATIENT SELECTION;
PERITONEAL DIALYSIS;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;
RENAL DIALYSIS;
RESEARCH DESIGN;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SAMPLE SIZE;
SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 34248170297
PISSN: 13192442
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Editorial |
Times cited : (7)
|
References (14)
|