Predictions of postoperative visual outcome in subjects with cataract: A preoperative and postoperative study

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 91, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 638-643

  Douthwaite, William A ^a   Vianya Estopà, Marta ^a   Elliott, David B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRADFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRITICAL FLICKER FUSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; FEMALE; FLICKER FUSION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; READING; VISION DISORDERS; VISION TESTS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 34248169145     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2006.093401     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. McGraw PV, Barrett BT. Assessing retinal/neural function in the presence of ocular media opacities. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1996;234:280-3.
2. Guyton DL. Preoperative visual acuity evaluation. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1987;27:140-8.
3. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Report: Cataract Management Guideline Panel. Cataract in adults: management of real world impairment. Rockville, MD, Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, AHCPR; 1993, (AHCPR Publication Number, 93-0542).
4. Devereux CJ, Rando A, Wagstaff CM, et al. Potential acuity meter results in cataract patients. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000;28:414-18.
5. Gus PI, Kwitco I, Roehe D, et al. Potential acuity meter accuracy in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:1238-41.
6. del Romo G, Douthwaite WA, Elliott DB. Critical flicker frequency as a potential vision technique in the presence of cataracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:1107-12.
7. Vianya-Estopa M, Douthwaite WA, Pesudovs K, et al. Development of a critical flicker/fusion frequency test for potential vision testing in media opacities. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:905-10.
8. Han DP, Thompson HS, Folk JC. Differentiation between recently resolved optic neuritis and central serous retinopathy. Use of tests of visual function. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103:394-6.
9. Nakamura M, Yamamoto M. Variable pattern of recovery of Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:534-5.
10. Simonson E, Wohlrabe RG. The flicker fusion frequency in different testing arrangements, of healthy older persons, of patients with cataracts and patients with retinal disorders. Am J Ophthalmol 1963;55:1023-32.
11. Massof RW, Fleischman JA, Fine SL, et al. Flicker fusion thresholds in Best macular dystrophy. Arch Ophthalmol 1977;95:991-4.
12. Babel J, Rey P, Stangos N, et al. The functional examination of the macular and perimacular region with the aid of flicker-fusion thresholds. Doc Ophthalmol 1969;26:248-56.
13. Fine EM, Hazel CA, Petre KL, et al. Are the benefits of sentence context different in central and peripheral vision? Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:764-9.
14. Patel B, Elloitt DB, Whitaker D. Optimal reading speed in simulated cataract: development of a potential vision test. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2001;21:272-6.
15. Elliott DB, Patel B, Whitaker D. Development of a reading speed test for potential vision measurement. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:1945-9.
16. Legge GE, Pelli DG, Rubin GS, et al. Psychophysics of reading. I. Normal vision. Vis Res 1985;25:239-52.
17. Legge GE, Rubin GS, Pelli DG, et al. Psychophysics of reading. II. Low vision. Vis Res 1985;25:253-65.
18. Bullimore MA, Bailey IL. Reading and eye movements in age-related maculopathy. Optom Vis Sci 1995;72:125-38.
19. Whittaker SG, Lovie-Kitchen J. Visual requirements for reading. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:54-65.
20. Pesudovs K, Patel B, Bradbury JA, et al. Reading speed test for potential central vision measurement. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002;30:183-6.
21. Stifter E, Sacu S, Weghaupt H, et al. Reading performance depending on the type of cataract and its predictability on the visual outcome. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:1259-67.
22. Carkeet A. Modeling logMAR visual acuity scores: effects of termination rules and alternative forced choice options. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:529-38.
23. Minkowski JS, Palese M, Guyton DL. Potential acuity meter using a minute aerial pinhole aperture. Ophthalmology 1983;90:1360-8.
24. Campbell FW, Kulikowski JJ, Levinson J. The effect of orientation on the visual resolution of gratings. J Physiol 1966;187:427-77.
25. Landis C. Determinants of the critical flicker-fusion threshold. Physiol Rev 1954;34:259-86.
26. Legge GE, Ross JA, Luebker A, et al. Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The Minnesota Low-Vision Reading Test. Optom Vis Sci 1989;66:843-53.
27. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. Lens Opacities Classification System. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:831-6.
28. Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983;32:307-17.
29. Bland M. An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987:280-3.
30. Elliott DB. Evaluating visual function in cataract. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:896-902.
31. Rubin GS, Roche KB, Prasada-Rao P, et al. Visual impairment and disability in older adults. Optom Vis Sci 1994;71:750-60.
32. Steinberg EP, Tielsch JM, Schein OD, et al. National study of cataract surgery outcomes. Variation in 4-month postoperative outcomes as reflected in multiple outcomes measures. Ophthalmology 1994;100:1131-40.
33. Superstein R, Boyaner D, Overbury O. Functional complaints, visual acuity, spatial contrast sensitivity and glare disability in preoperative and postoperative cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:575-81.
34. Elliott DB, Patla AE, Furniss M, et al. Improvements in clinical and functional vision and quality of life after second eye cataract surgery. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:13-24.
35. Lundstrom M, Stenevi U, Thorburn W. The Swedish National Cataract Register: a 9-year review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2002;80:248-57.
36. Norregaard JC, Bernth-Petersen P, Alonso J, et al. Visual functional outcomes of cataract surgery in the United States, Canada, Denmark and Spain: report of the International Cataract surgery Outcomes Study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:2135-42.
37. Johnston RL, Sparrow JM, Canninmg CR, et al. Pilot National Electronic Cataract Surgery Survey: I. Method, descriptive and process features. Eye 2004;17:1-7.
38. Livingstone MS, Hubel DH. Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement and depth. J Neurosci 1987;7:3416-68.
39. McKendrick AM, Johnson CA. Temporal properties of vision. In: Kaufman PL, Alm A, eds. Adler's physiology of the eye.Clinical application. St Louis: Mosby, 2003:511-30.
40. Ikeda H, Wright MJ. Differential effects of refractive errors and receptive field organisation of central and peripheral ganglion cells. Vis Res 1972;12:1465-76.