Risk factors for structural chromosomal abnormality in ≥ 2 miscarriages, as an instrument for selective karyotyping;Risicofactoren voor structurele chromosoomafwijking bij ≥ 2 miskramen als instrument voor selectieve karyotypering

Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde

Volumn 151, Issue 15, 2007, Pages 863-867

  Franssen, M T M ^a   Korevaar, J C ^a   Leschot, N J ^a   Bossuyt, P M M ^a   Knegt, A C ^a   Gerssen Schoorl, K B J ^b   Wouters, C H ^c   Hansson, K B M ^d   Hochstenbach, P F R ^e   Madan, K ^f   Van Der Veen, F ^a   Goddijn, M ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^f VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; HEREDITY; HETEROZYGOTE DETECTION; HUMAN; KARYOTYPING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NETHERLANDS; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SCREENING; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION;

ABORTION, HABITUAL; ABORTION, SPONTANEOUS; ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; FEMALE; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENETIC SCREENING; HETEROZYGOTE; HETEROZYGOTE DETECTION; HUMANS; KARYOTYPING; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; PATIENT SELECTION; PREGNANCY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 34248161602     PISSN: 00282162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Hook EB, Healy NP, Willey AM. How much difference does chromosome banding make? Adjustments in prevalence and mutation rates of human structural cytogenetic abnormalities. Ann Hum Genet. 1989;53(Pt 3):237-42.
2. Braekeleer M de, Dao TN. Cytogenetic studies in couples experiencing repeated pregnancy losses. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:519-28.
3. The investigation and treatment of couples with recurrent miscarriage. Guideline 17. Londen: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2003.
4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin. Management of recurrent pregnancy loss. Number 24, February 2001. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;78:179-90.
5. Habituele abortus. Richtlijn 20. Utrecht: Nederlandse Vereniging voor Obstetrie en Gynaecologie; 1999.
6. Mitelman F, editor. An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN) 1995: recommendations of the International Standing Committee on Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Bazel: Karger; 1995.
7. Clifford K, Rai R, Watson H, Regan L. An informative protocol for the investigation of recurrent miscarriage: preliminary experience of 500 consecutive cases. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1328-32.
8. Tharapel AT, Tharapel SA, Bannerman RM. Recurrent pregnancy losses and parental chromosome abnormalities: a review. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;92:899-914.
9. Fryns JP, Buggenhout G van. Structural chromosome rearrangements in couples with recurrent fetal wastage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1998;81:171-6.
10. Portnoi MF, Joye N, Akker J van den, Morlier G, Taillemite JL. Karyotypes of 1142 couples with recurrent abortion. Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 72:31-4.
11. Bourrouillou G, Colombies P, Dastugue N. Chromosome studies in 2136 couples with spontaneous abortions. Hum Genet. 1986;74: 399-401.
12. Smith A, Gaha TJ. Data on families of chromosome translocation carriers ascertained because of habitual spontaneous abortion. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;30:57-62.
13. Sachs ES, Jahoda MG, Hemel JO van, Hoogeboom AJM, Sandkuyl LA. Chromosome studies of 500 couples with two or more abortions. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;65:375-8.