Late-season common waterhemp (amaranthus rudis) interference in narrow- And wide-row soybean

Weed Technology

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 947-952

  Sprague, Christy L ^a   Steckel, Lawrence E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Integrated weed management; Interference; Late season competition

Indexed keywords

AMARANTHUS; AMARANTHUS TUBERCULATUS; CANNABIS; CANNABIS SATIVA; GLYCINE MAX;

EID: 34248151217     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WT-03-131R     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bensch, C. N., M. J. Horak, and D. Peterson. 2003. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus), Palmer amaranth (A. palmeri), and common waterhemp (A. rudis) in soybean. Weed Sci. 51:37-43.
2. Board, J. E., B. G. Harville, and A. M. Saxton. 1990. Narrow-row seed-yield enhancement in determinate soybean. Agron. J. 82:64-68.
3. Board, J. E., M. Kamal, and B. G. Harville. 1992. Temporal importance of greater light interception to increase yield in narrow-row soybean. Agron. J. 84:575-579.
4. Burnside, O. C. and W. L. Colville. 1964. Soybean and weed yields as affected by irrigation, row spacing, tillage, and amiben. Weeds 12:109-112.
5. Carmer, S. G., W. E. Nyquist, and W. M. Walker. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two or three-factor treatment designs. Agron. J. 81:665-672.
6. Coffman, C. B. and J. R. Frank. 1991. Weed-crop responses to weed management systems in conservation tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 5:76-81.
7. Cousens, R. 1985. A simple model relating yield loss to weed density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 107:239-252.
8. Dieleman, A., A. S. Hamill, G. C. Fox, and C. J. Swanton. 1996. Decision rules for postemergence control of pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 44:126-132.
9. Gallagher, R. S. and J. Cardina. 1998. Phytochrome-mediated Amaranthus germination I: effect of seed burial and germination temperature. Weed Sci. 46:48-52.
10. Hager, A. G., L. M. Wax, E. W. Stoller, and G. A. Bollero. 2002. Common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) interference in soybean. Weed Sci. 50:607-610.
11. Hartzler, R. G., D. D. Buhler, and D. E. Stoltenberg. 1999. Emergence characteristics of four annual weed species. Weed Sci. 47:578-584.
12. Hinz, J.R.R. and M.D.K. Owen. 1997. Acetolactate synthase resistance in a common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) population. Weed Technol. 11:13-18.
13. Horak, M. J. and T. M. Loughin. 2000. Growth analysis of four Amaranthus species. Weed Sci. 48:347-355.
14. Horak, M. J. and D. E. Peterson. 1995. Biotypes of Palmer amaranth (Ama- ranthus palmeri) and common waterhemp (Amaranthus rudis) are resistant to imazethapyr and thifensulfuron. Weed Technol. 9:192-195.
15. Knezevic, S. Z., M. J. Horak, and R. L. Vanderlip. 1997. Relative time of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) emergence is critical in pigweed-sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] competition. Weed Sci. 45:502-508.
16. Knezevic, S. Z., R. L. Vanderlip, and M. J. Horak. 2001. Relative time of redroot pigweed emergence affects dry matter partitioning. Weed Sci. 49:617-621.
17. Légère, A. and M. M. Schreiber. 1989. Competition and canopy architecture as effected by soybean (Glycine max) row width and density of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci. 37:84-92.
18. McIntosh, M. S. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J. 75:153155.
19. Moolani, M. K., E. L. Knake, and F. W. Slife. 1964. Competition of smooth pigweed with corn and soybeans. Weeds 12:126-128.
20. Ritchie, S. W., J. J. Hanway, H. E. Thompson, and G. O. Benson. 1993. How a Soybean Plant Develops. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Cooperative Extension Service Special Rep. 53.
21. [SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 2000. SAS User's Guide. Version 8. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.
22. Sprague, C. L., E. W. Stoller, and L. M. Wax. 1997. Response of an aceo- tlactate synthase (ALS)-resistant biotype ofAmaranthus rudis to selected ALS-inhibiting and alternative herbicides. Weed Res. 37:93-101.
23. Steckel, L. E., C. L. Sprague, A. G. Hager, F. W. Simmons, and G. Bollero. 2004a. Effects of shading on common waterhemp growth and development. Weed Sci. 51:898-903.
24. Steckel, L. E., C. L. Sprague, E. W. Stoller, L. M. Wax, and F. W. Simmons. 2004b. Common waterhemp emergence as affected by crop and tillage over five years. Weed Sci. In press.
25. Stoller, E. W., S. K. Harrison, L. M. Wax, E. E. Regnier, and E. D. Nafziger. 1997. Weed interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Rev. Weed Sci. 3: 155-181.
26. Thornley, J.H.M. and I. R. Johnson. 1990. Plant and Crop Modeling: A Mathematical Approach to Plant and Crop Physiology. New York: Academic. 78 p.
27. Vengris, J. 1963. The effect of time of seeding on growth and development of rough pigweed and yellow foxtail. Weed Sci. 11:48-50.
28. Wax, L. M. 1995. Pigweeds of the Midwest: distribution, importance and management. Proc. Iowa Integrated Crop Manag. Conf. 7:239-242.
29. Wax, L. M. and J. W. Pendleton. 1968. Effect ofrow spacing on weed control in soybeans. Weed Sci. 16:462-465.