Combined weighted inversion of electrical resistivity data arising from different array types

Journal of Applied Geophysics

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 124-140

  Athanasiou, E N ^a   Tsourlos, P I ^a   Papazachos, C B ^a   Tsokas, G N ^a  

^a ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI   (Greece)

Author keywords

Combined joint weighted resistivity inversion; ERT; Resistivity arrays

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; JACOBIAN MATRICES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TWO DIMENSIONAL;

DATA SETS; GEOELECTRIC MODELS; GEOELECTRICS; RESISTIVITY ARRAYS; WEIGHTED INVERSION ALGORITHM;

GEOPHYSICS;

ALGORITHM; DATA INTERPRETATION; DATA INVERSION; DATA SET; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; GEOELECTRIC FIELD; INVERSE ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 34248146459     PISSN: 09269851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2006.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Athanasiou, E., 2004. Combined inversion of geoelectrical data by the use of contact electrodes. M.Sc. Thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
2. Dahlin T. The development of DC resistivity imaging techniques. Computers & Geoscience 27 9 (2001) 1019-1029
3. Dahlin T., and Zhou B. A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays. Geophysical Prospecting 52 (2004) 379-398
4. de Groot-Hedlin C., and Constable S. Occam's inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models from magnetoteluric data. Geophysics 55 (1990) 1613-1624
5. de la Vega M., Osella A., and Lascano E. Joint inversion of Wenner and dipole-dipole data to study a gasoline-contaminated soil. Journal of Applied Geophysics 54 (2003) 97-109
6. Griffiths D., and Barker R. Two dimensional resistivity imaging and modeling in areas of complex geology. Journal of Applied Geophysics 19 (1993) 211-226
7. LaBrecque D., Miletto M., Daily W., Ramirez A., and Owen E. The effects of noise on "Occam" inversion of resistivity tomography data. Geophysics 61 (1996) 538-548
8. Li Y., and Oldenburg W. Approximate inverse mapping in DC resistivity problems. Geophysical Journal International 109 (1992) 343-362
9. Loke M.H., and Barker R. Least-squares deconvolution of apparent resistivity pseudosections. Geophysics 60 (1995) 1682-1690
10. Loke M.H., and Barker R. Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting 44 (1996) 131-152
11. Loke M.H., and Barker R. Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion. Geophysical Prospecting 44 (1996) 499-523
12. McGillivray P., and Oldenburg D. Methods for calculating Frechet derivatives and sensitivities for the non-linear inverse problem. A comparative study. Geophysical Prospecting 38 (1990) 499-524
13. Park S.K., and Van G.P. Inversion of pole-pole data for 3-D resistivity structure beneath arrays of electrodes. Geophysics 56 (1991) 951-960
14. Sasaki Y. Resolution of resistivity tomography inferred from numerical simulation. Geophysical Prospecting 40 (1992) 453-464
15. Stummer P., Maurer H., and Green A. Experimental design. Electrical resistivity data sets that provide optimum subsurface information. Geophysics 69 1 (2004) 120-139
16. Tarantola A. Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. Geophysics 49 8 (1984) 1259-1266
17. Tsourlos, P., 1995. Modelling interpretation and inversion of multielectrode resistivity survey data. Ph.D. Thesis, University of York.
18. Tsourlos P.I., Szymanski J.E., and Tsokas G.N. The effect of terrain topography on commonly used resistivity arrays. Geophysics 64 5 (1999) 1357-1363
19. Ward S. Resistivity and induced polarization methods: in investigations in geophysics no 5. In: Ward S. (Ed). Geotechnical and Environmental Geophysics vol. I (1989), SEG, Tulsa 147-189
20. Yi M.J., Kim J.H., and Chung S.H. Enhancing the resolving power of least-squares inversion with active constraint balancing. Geophysics 68 3 (2003) 931-941