Multiparty split-ticket voting estimation as an ecological inference problem

Ecological Inference: New Methodological Strategies

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 333-350

  Benoit, Kenneth ^a   Giannetti, Daniela ^b  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248145288     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511510595.016     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Banducci, S., J. Karp, and J. Vowles. 1998. “Vote Splitting under MMP.” In J. Vowles et al. (eds.), Voters’ Victory: New Zealand’s First Election under Proportional Representation. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
2. Beck, Paul Allen. 1997. Party Politics in America, 8th ed. New York: Longman.
3. Benoit, Kenneth. 2001. “Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: Electoral Coordination in the Hungarian Elections of 1998.” Manuscript Trinity College.
4. Benoit, Kenneth, Daniela Giannetti, and Michael Laver. 2002. “‘Instrumental’ and ‘Expressive’ Voting in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: Split-Ticket Voting in Italy.” Presented at the Conference on Ecological Inference, Center for Basic Research in the Social Sciences, Harvard University, June 17–18, 2002.
5. Brennan, Geoffrey and Alan Hamlin. 2000. Democratic Devices and Desires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Brennan, Geoffrey and Loren Lomaski. 1993. Democracy and Decision. New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Burden, Barry C. and David C. Kimball. 1998. “A New Approach to the Study of Ticket Splitting.” American Political Science Review, 92: 533–544.
8. D’Alimonte, Roberto. 1998. Appendix: The Italian elections of 1996. European Journal of Political Research, 34: 171–174.
9. Fiorina, Morris P. 1996. Divided Government, 2nd ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
10. Johnston, Ron and Charles Pattie. 1999. “Constituency Campaign Intensity and Split-Ticket Voting: New Zealand’s First Election under MMP.” British Journal of Political Science, 21: 95–108.
11. Johnston, Ron and Charles Pattie. 2000. “Ecological Inference and Entropy-Maximizing: An Alternative Procedure for Split-Ticket Voting.” Political Analysis, 8, 4: 333–345.
12. King, Gary. 1997. A Solution to the Ecological Inference Problem. Princeton: Princeton University Press
13. Laver, Michael. 1987. “The Logic of Plurality Voting in Multiparty Systems.” In Manfred Holler. (ed.), The Logic of Multiparty Systems. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
14. Moser, Robert G. 1999. “Electoral Systems and theNumber of Parties in Postcommunist States.” World Politics, 51: 359–384.
15. Reed, Stephen and Michael F. Thies. 2001. “The Causes of Electoral Reform in Japan.” In Shugart and Wattenberg (2001b).
16. Rosen, Ori, Wenxin Jiang, Gary King, and Martin A. Tanner. 2001. “Bayesian and Frequentist Inference for Ecological Inference: the R × C Case.” Statistica Neerlandica, 55, 2: 134–156.
17. Schuessler, Alexander A. 2000. A Logic of Expressive Choice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
18. Shin, Michael. 2001. “The Politicization of Place in Italy.” Political Geography, 20: 331–352.
19. Shin, Michael E., and John Agnew. 2001. “The Geography of Party Replacement in Italy, 1987–1996.” Political Geography, 21: 221–242.
20. Shugart, Matthew S. and Martin P.Wattenberg. 2001a. “Mixed-member Electoral Systems:ADefinition and Typology.” In Shugart and Wattenberg (2001b).
21. Shugart, Matthew S. and Martin P. Wattenberg (eds.). 2001b. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Strom, Kaare, Ian Budge, and Michael Laver. 1994. “Constraints on Cabinet Formation in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science, 38, 2: 303–335.
23. Tsebelis, George. 1988. “Nested Games: The Cohesion of the French Coalitions.” British Journal of Political Science, 18, April: 145–170.