IMRT in abdominal neuroblastoma [1]

Pediatric Blood and Cancer

Volumn 48, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 714-

  Plowman, P N ^a   Cooke, K ^b   Blasiak Wal, I ^b   Walsh, N ^b  

^a HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (United Kingdom)

^b CROMWELL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMEN; ABDOMINAL TUMOR; CARCINOGENESIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; GROWTH RETARDATION; HUMAN; INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY; KIDNEY; LETTER; LINEAR ACCELERATOR; NEUROBLASTOMA; PEDIATRICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; SPINAL CORD; VERTEBRA BODY;

ABDOMINAL NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; NEUROBLASTOMA; RADIOTHERAPY DOSAGE; RADIOTHERAPY, INTENSITY-MODULATED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34248138430     PISSN: 15455009     EISSN: 15455017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.21068     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. Paulino AC, Ferenci MS, Chiang K, et al. Comparison of conventional to intensity modulated radiation therapy for abdominal neuroblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2006;46:739-744.
2. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Collaborative Working Group. Intensity modulated radiotherapy: Current status and issues of interest. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;51:880-914.
3. Beavis AW. Is tomotherapy the future of IMRT? Brit J Radiol 2004;77:285-295.
4. Breen SL, Kehagioglou P, Usher C, Plowman PN. A comparison of conventional, conformal and intensity modulated coplanar plans for posterior fossa treatment. Brit J Radiol 2004;77:768-774.