Deliberative democracy and the discursive dilemma

Nous

Volumn 35, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2001, Pages 268-299

  Pettit, Philip ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248083420     PISSN: 00294624     EISSN: 14680068     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0029-4624.35.s1.11     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Benhabib, S. (1994). "Deliberative rationality and models of democratic legitimacy." Constellations 1:26-52.
2. Black, D. (1958). The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
3. Brennan, G. (2001). "Collective Coherence?" International Review of Law and Economics 21.
4. Brennan, G. and P. Pettit (1990). "Unveiling the Vote." British Journal of Political Science 20:311-33.
5. Buchanan, J. and G. Tullock (1962). The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
6. Chapman, B. (1998). "Law, Incommensurability, and Conceptually Sequenced Argument." University of Pennsylvania Law Review 146:1487-1582.
7. Chapman, B. (1998). "More Easily Done than Said: Rules, Reason and Rational Social Choice." Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18:293-329.
8. Cohen, J. (1986). "An Epistemic Conception of Democracy." Ethics 97:26-38.
9. Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. The Good Polity. A. Hamlin and P. Pettit: 17-34.
10. Coleman, J. and J. Ferejohn (1986). "Democracy and Social Choice." Ethics 97:6-25.
11. Condorcet, M. D. (1976). Condorcet: Selected Writings. Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill
12. Dryzek, J. S. (1990). Discursive Democracy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
13. Estlund, D. (1993). Making Truth Safe for Democracy. The Idea of Democracy. D. Copp, J. Hampton and J. E. Roemer. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 71-100.
14. Estlund, D. (1993). "Who's Afraid of Deliberative Democracy?" Texas Law Review 71:1437-77.
15. Estlund, D. (1994). "Opinion Leaders, Independence, and Condorcet's Jury Theorem." Theory and Decision 36:131-62.
16. Estlund, D. (1997). Beyond Fairness and Deliberation: The Epistemic Dimension of Democratic Authority. Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. J. Bohman and W. Rehg. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.
17. Estlund, D. and J. Waldron (1989). "Democratic Theory and the Public Interest: Condorcet and Rousseau Revisited." American Political Science Review 83:1317-1328.
18. Goodin, R. E. (1999). Democratic Deliberation Within. Canberra, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University.
19. Grofman, B. N. and S. Feld (1988). "Rousseau's General Will: A Condorcetian Perspective." American Political Science Review 82:567-76.
20. Gutmann, A. and D. Thompson (1996). Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press.t
21. Habermas, J. (1984, 1989). A Theory of Communicative Action, Vols 1 and 2. Cambridge, Polity Press.
22. Kornhauser, L. A. (1992). "Modelling Collegial Courts. I. Path-Dependence." International Review of Law and Economics 12:169-85.
23. Kornhauser, L. A. (1992). "Modelling Collegial Courts. II. Legal Doctrine." Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 8:441-70.
24. Kornhauser, L. A. and L. G. Sager (1986). "Unpacking the Court." Yale Law Journal 82.
25. Kornhauser, L. A. and L. G. Sager (1993). "The One and the Many: Adjudication in Collegial Courts." California Law Review 81:1-59.
26. List, C. and P. Pettit (2002). "Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result." Economics and Philosophy.
27. Owen, G., B. Grofman, et al. (1989). "Proving a distribution-free generalization of the Condorcet jury theorem." Mathematical Social Sciences 17:1-16.
28. Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
29. Pettit, P. (2000). "Democracy, Electoral and Contestatory." Nomos 42:105-44..
30. Pettit, P. (2001). A Theory of Freedom: From the Psychology to the Politics of Agency. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. Skyrms, B. (1966). Choice and Chance: An Introduction to Inductive Logic. Belmont, Cal., Dickenson.
32. Stearns, M. L. (1999). "Should Justices Ever Switch Votes? Miller v. Albright in Social Choice Perspective." Supreme Court Economic Review 7:87-156.
33. Sunstein, C. (1999). One Case At A Time. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
34. Sunstein, C. R. (1993a). The Partial Constitution. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press.
35. Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, Princeton University Press.