A puzzle about Hobbes on self-defense

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly

Volumn 82, Issue 3-4, 2001, Pages 332-361

  Finkelstein, Claire ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248073550     PISSN: 02790750     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0114.00131     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Judith Jarvis Thomson. "Self-Defense," Philosophy and Public Affairs 20, no. 4 (Fall 1991): 283-310. In Thomson's case, the relevant right is the right not to be attacked by the person attacking, rather than the right to life.
2. Michael Otsuka "Killing the Innocent in Self-Defense." Philosophy and Public Affairs, 23, no. 1 (Winter, 1994): 74-94.
3. John Locke, THE SECOND TREATISE OF GOVERNMENT, Ch. III, § 16.
4. Leviathan, Ch. XIV, ¶ 4.
5. Gregory S. Kavka, Hobbesian Moral and Political Theory (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986), § 8.2.
6. Leviathan, Ch. VI, ¶ 53.
7. Jean Hampton, Hobbes and the Social Contract Tradition (Cambridge, 1986), pp. 19 - 24;
8. David Gauthier, The Logic of Leviathan (Oxford, 1969), p. 9.
9. Leviathan, Ch. XIV, ¶ 27.
10. Claire Finkelstein, "Duress: A Philosophical Account of the Defense in Law," Arizona Law Review, Vol. 37, no. 1 (1995), p. 251.
11. Leviathan, Ch. XIV, ¶ 29.
12. Gregory S. Kavka, "The Toxin Puzzle," Analysis, vol. 43 (1983): 33-36.
13. Michael Bratman, "Planning and Temptation," in Mind and Morals, eds. Larry May, et. al (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1996), p. 293.
14. Edward F. MeClennen, Rationality and Dynamic Choice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990). 50 Leviathan, Ch. XV, ¶ 4.
15. David Gauthier, Moral Dealing: Contract, Ethics, and Reason (Cornell University Press, 1990), p. 136.
16. Leviathan, Ch. XV, ¶ 5.
17. Leviathan, Ch. XIV, ¶ 16.
18. Leviathan, Ch. XXI, ¶ 12.
19. Leviathan, Ch. XXI, ¶ 21.