An inside view: Professional judges’ and lay judges’ support for mixed tribunals

Law and Policy

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 93-122

  Ivković, Sanja Kutnjak ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248059176     PISSN: 02658240     EISSN: 14679930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1467-9930.2003.00142.x     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Allen, James L. (1977) “Attitude Change Following Jury Duty,” Justice System Journal 2: 246-57.
2. Anderson, Stanley (1990) “Lay Judges and Jurors in Denmark,” American Journal of Comparative Law 38: 839-64.
3. Baumhart, Raymond (1968) An Honest Profit; What Businessmen Say About Ethics in Business. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
4. Berger, Joseph, M. Hamet Fisek, Robert Z. Norman, and Morris Zelditch, Jr. (1977) Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation—States Approach. New York: Elsevier.
5. Berger, Joseph, Susan J. Rosenholtz, and Morris Zelditch, Jr. (1980) “Status Organizing Process.” In Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 6, edited by A. Inkeles, N. J. Smelser & R. H. Turner. Palo Alto, Calif.: Annual Reviews.
6. Berger, Joseph, Murray Webster, Jr., Cecelia Ridgeway, and Susan J. Rosenholtz (1986) “Status Cues, Expectations, and Behavior.” In Advances in Group Processes, vol. 3, edited by E. J. Lawler. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
7. Berman, Jesse (1969) “The Cuban Popular Tribunals,” Columbia Law Review 69: 1317-54.
8. Borucka—arctowa, Maria (1976) “Citizen Participation in the Administration of Justice: Research and Policy in Poland.” In Zur Soziologie des Gerichtsverfahrens. Jahrbuch für Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie, vol. 4, edited by L. Friedman & M. Rehbinder. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
9. Brandl, Steven G., James Frank, Robert E. Worden, and Timothy S. Bynum (1994) “Global and Specific Attitudes Toward the Police: Disentangling the Relationship,” Justice Quarterly 11: 119-34.
10. Buchholz, Irmgard (1986) “The Role of the Lay Judges in the German Democratic Republic (GDR),” International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 10(2):215-22.
11. Canada. Law Reform Commission Of Canada (1979a) “Canadian Juror's View of the Criminal Jury Trial: A Report to the Law Reform Commission of Canada.” In Studies on the Jury. Ottawa: The Commission.
12. Canada. Law Reform Commission Of Canada (1979b) “Canadian Trial Judges’ View of the Criminal Jury Trial: A Report to the Law Reform Commission of Canada.” In Studies on the Jury. Ottawa: The Commission.
13. Casper, Gerhard, and Hans Zeisel (1972) “Lay Judges in the German Criminal Courts,” Journal of Legal Studies 1: 135-91.
14. Cecil, Joe S., E. Allen Lind, and Gordon Bermant (1987) Jury Service in Lengthy Civil Trials. Washington, D.C.: Federal Judicial Center.
15. Consolini, Paula M. (1992) “Learning by Doing Justice: Jury Service and Political Attitudes.” Ph.D. diss., University of California, Berkeley.
16. Cross, K. Patricia (1977) “Not Can, But Will College Teaching Be Improved?” New Directions for Higher Education 17: 1-15.
17. Dennis, Jack (1976) “Who Supports the Presidency?” Society 13(5):48-53.
18. Diamond, Shari S. (1993) “What Jurors Think: Expectations and Reactions of Citizens Who Serve as Jurors.” In Verdict: Assessing the Civil Jury System, edited by R. E. Litan. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
19. Duff, Peter, Mark Findlay, Clara Howarth, and Chan Tsang—fai (1992) Juries: A Hong Kong Perspective. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Univ. Press.
20. Easton, David (1965) A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice—Hall.
21. Flanagan, Timothy J., and Dennis R. Longmire (1996) Americans View Crime and Justice: A National Public Opinion Survey. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.
22. Frassine, Ingrid, Karl Piska, and K. Zeisel (1979) “Kaptel: Österreich.” In Der Laienrichter im Strafprozess, edited by G. Casper & H. Zeisel. Heidelberg, Germany: C. F. Müller Juristischer Verlag.
23. Gallup Organization (2000) “Military Number One in Public Confidence HMOs Last.” Poll analysis, 10 July. Available at http://www.gallup.com/poll/releasespr000710.asp (subscription required).
24. Gerken, Jutta (1988) “Bürger als Richter. Über Jugendschöffen und den Erziehungsanspruch des Jugendstrafrechts.” In Ein Trojanisches Pferd im Rechtsstaat, edited by J. Gerken & K. F. Schumman. Pfaffenweiler, Germany: Centaurus—Verlagsgessellschaft.
25. Görlitz, Akel (1970) Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit in Deutschland. Neuwied am Rhein, Germany: Luchterhand (German).
26. Hans, Valerie P., and Neil Vidmar (1986) Judging the Jury. New York: Plenum Press.
27. Heath, T. J. (1993) “God, Man and the Stipendiary,” Justice of the Peace 157: 137-38.
28. Kamhi, Samuel, and Branko Čalija (1974) Sistem porote u našoj zemlji i problemi vezani za učešće gradjana u vršenju pravosudja. Sarajevo: Svjetlost.
29. Klami, Hannu Tapani, and Merva Hämäläinen (1992) Lawyers and Laymen on the Bench: A Study of Comparative Legal Sociology. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
30. Klami, Hannu Tapani, Merva Hämäläinen, Minna Hatakka, and Johanna Sorvettula (1990) “Nonprofessional Judicial Reasoning,” Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia del Diritto 67: 93-114.
31. Klausa, Ekkehard (1972) Ehrenamtliche Richter; ihre Auswahl u. Fuktion, empir untersucht. Frankfurt: Athenäum—Verlag.
32. Krystufek, Z. (1976) “The Function of the Lay Judge in Czechoslovakia.” In Zur Soziologie des Gerichtsverfahrens. Jahrbuch för Rechtssoziologie und Rechtstheorie, vol. 4, edited by L. Friedman & M. Rehbinder. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
33. Kulcsàr, Kàlmàn (1972) “Lay Participation in Organizational Decision Making.” In Hungarian Sociological Studies. The Sociological Review, Monograph 17, edited by P. Halmos. United Kingdom: University of Keele.
34. Kulcsàr, Kàlmàn (1982) People's Assessors in the Courts. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
35. Kutnjak Ivković, Sanja (1999) Lay Participation in Criminal Trials: The Case of Croatia. Lanham, Md.: Austin & Winfield.
36. Kutnjak Ivković, Sanja (2002) Public Support for the Police Across the World. Unpublished paper.
37. Larwood, Laurie, and William Whittaker (1977) “Managerial Myopia: Self—Serving Biases in Organizational Planning,” Journal of Applied Psychology 62: 194-98.
38. Ljubanović, Vladimir (1983) “Sudjelovanje gradjana u suvremenom jugoslavenskom krivičnom sudjenju.”Ph.D. diss. University of Zagreb, Croatia.
39. Ljubanović, Vladimir (1989) Demokratizacija krivičnog pravosudja. Osijek, Croatia: Pravni fakultet Sveučilišta u Osijeku.
40. Louis Harris And Associates (1987) Judges’ Opinions on Procedural Issues: A Survey of State and Federal Judges Who Spend at Least Half Their Time on General Civil Cases. [s.l.]: Louis Harris and Associates.
41. Maccoun, Robert J., and Tom R. Tyler (1988) “The Basis of Citizens’ Perceptions of the Criminal Jury; Procedural Fairness, Accuracy and Efficiency” Law and Human Behavior 12: 333-52.
42. Mccloskey, Herbert, and Alida Brill (1983) Dimensions of Tolerance: What Americans Believe about Civil Liberties. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
43. Moore, Lloyd E. (1973) The Jury: Tool of Kings, Palladium of Liberty. Cincinnati: Anderson Pub. Co.
44. National Center For State Courts (1978) The Public Image of Courts. [Denver]: National Center for State Courts.
45. Pabst, William R., G. Thomas Munsterman, and Chester H. Mount (1976) “The Myth of the Unwilling Juror,” Judicature 60: 164-71.
46. Richert, John P. (1977) “A New Verdict on Juror Willingness,” Judicature 60: 497-501.
47. Roberts, Julian V., and Loretta J. Stalans (2000) Public Opinion, Crime, and Criminal Justice. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
48. Sarat, Austin (1975) “Support for the Legal System: An Analysis of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behavior,” American Politics Quarterly 3: 3-24.
49. Sarat, Austin (1977) “Studying American Legal Culture: An Assessment of Survey Evidence,” Law & Society Review 11: 427-88.
50. Smaus, Gerlinda (1985) Das Strafrecht und die Kriminalität in der Alltagssprache der deutschen Bevölkerung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
51. Svenson, Ola (1981) “Are We Less Risky and More Skillful Than Our Fellow Drivers?” Acta Psychologica 47: 143-48.
52. Thaman, Stephen C. (1998) “Spain Returns to Trial by Jury,” Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 21: 241-537.
53. Transparency International (1995-) Internet Corruption Perception Index. [s.l.]: Transparency International.
54. Tyler, Tom (1990) Why People Obey the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Compliance. New Haven, Conn.: ∖Yale Univ. Press.
55. United States. Bureau Of Justice Statistics (1998) Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics, 1997. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
56. Weinstein, Neil D. (1980) “Unrealistic Optimism About Future Life Events,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 806-20.
57. White, Mervin F., and Ben A. Menke (1982) “On Assessing the Mood of the Public Toward the Police: Some Conceptual Issues,” Journal of Criminal Justice 10: 211-30.
58. World Values Study Group (1999) World Values Survey, 1981-1984 and 1990-1993. Computer file. 2d. ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI.: Institute for Social Research.
59. Zawadzki Slyvester (1970) “Model Ustrojowy Kawnika Ludowego w wietle Przeprowadzonych Badań Pawnoemmpiryczynch.”In UdziałŁawnikow W Post powaniu Karnym, edited by S. Zawadzki & L. Kubicki. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Prawnicze.