Social protection: Values to be defended!

International Social Security Review

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 107-117

  Euzéby, Alain ^a  

^a Institut d'Etudes Politiques   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248055534     PISSN: 0020871X     EISSN: 1468246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-246X.2004.00190.x     Document Type: Note

References (62)

1. Arnsperger, C.; Van Parijs, P. 2000. Ethique économique et sociale (collection Repères). Paris, La Découverte.
2. Atkinson, A. B. 1995. “The welfare state and economic performance”, in National Tax Journal, Vol. 48, No. 2.
3. Atkinson, A. B. 1999. The economic consequences of rolling back the welfare state. London, MIT Press.
4. Barr, N. 1992. “Economic theory and the welfare state: A survey and interpretation”, in Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 30, No. 2.
5. Barr, N. 1998. The economics of the welfare state. Oxford, Oxford University Press; Stanford, Cal., Stanford University Press.
6. Barr, N. 2001. The welfare state as a piggy bank: Information, risk, uncertainty, and the role of the State. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
7. Barry, B. 1989. Theories of justice. Berkeley, Cal, University of California Press.
8. Beattie, R.; McGillivray, W. 1995. “A risky strategy: Reflections on the World Bank Report Averting the old age crisis”, in International Social Security Review, Vol. 48, No. 3–4.
9. Bulletin Luxembourgeois des Questions Sociales. 1997. Modernising and improving social protection in Europe. Luxembourg, Vol. 4.
10. Commission of the European Communities. 1997. Modernising and improving social protection in the European Union. Brussels.
11. Commission of the European Communities. 2000. Social Policy Agenda (COM(2000) 379 final). Brussels.
12. Culpitt, I. 1992. The welfare state and citizenship: Beyond the crisis of the welfare state. London, Sage.
13. Durkheim, E. 1982. The rules of sociological method, 1895. New York, Free Press (reprint).
14. Enjolras, B. 1999. Protection sociale et performance économique. Paris, Desclée de Brouwer.
15. Euzéby, A. 2002. “Protection sociale et justice sociale: quelques points de repères”, in Droit Social, No. 9–10.
16. Ferrara, P. J.; Tanner, M. D. 1998. A new deal for social security. Washington, DC, Cato Institute.
17. Fleurbaey, M. 1996. Théories économiques de la justice. Paris, Economica.
18. Friedman, M. and R. 1979. Free to choose: A personal statement. New York, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
19. Friedman, M. et R. 1980. La liberté de choix. Paris, Belfond.
20. Grubert, H. 1998. “Has globalization transformed the behavior of governments and taxpayers?”, in Proceedings of the ninetieth annual conference on taxation, 1997. Washington, DC, National Tax Association.
21. ILO. 1984. Into the twenty-first century: The development of social security. Geneva, International Labour Office.
22. ILO. 1993. Social insurance and social protection (Report of the Director-General, International Labour Conference, 80th session). Geneva, Inter national Labour Office.
23. ILO. 2001. Social security: A new consensus. Geneva, Social Security Department, International Labour Office.
24. IMF. 1994. “La réforme des régimes publics de retraite”, in FMI Bulletin (3 October). Washington, DC, International Monetary Fund.
25. IMF. 1999. World economic outlook. Washington, DC, Inter national Monetary Fund.
26. ISSA. 1997. The defence of social security (Social Security Documentation, African Series, No. 18). Geneva, International Social Security Association.
27. ISSA. 1998. The social security reform debate: In search of a new consensus – A summary. Geneva, International Social Security Association.
28. ISSA. 2000. Modernising and improving social protection by redistributing responsibilities. Geneva, International Social Security Association.
29. ISSA. 2001. Towards more effective social security in Asia and the Pacific. Geneva, International Social Security Association.
30. Kopits, G. 1997. Are Europe’s social security finances compatible with EMU? Washington, DC, International Monetary Fund.
31. Kymlicka, W. 2002. Contemporary political philosophy: An introduction. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
32. Mankiw, N. G. 1997. Principles of Economy, Orlando, Fl, Dryden Press.
33. Marsland, D. 1996. Welfare or welfare state? Contradictions and dilemmas in social policy. London, Saint Martin’s Press.
34. Mishra, R. 1984. The welfare state in crisis. New York, Wheatsheaf Books.
35. Mueller, D. C. 1979. Public choice. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
36. OECD. 1981. The welfare state in crisis. Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
37. OECD. 1987. Structural adjustment and economic performance. Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
38. OECD. 1994. La nouvelle politique sociale. Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
39. OECD. 1997. Making work pay: Taxation, benefits, employment and unemployment. Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
40. OECD. 1998a. Harmful tax practices publication. Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
41. OECD. 1998b. Perspectives économiques (June). Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
42. Peterson, W. 2002. “Capitalism: The greatest charity”, in Free Market, Vol. 20, No. 9.
43. Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press.
44. Rhodes, M. (ed.). 1997. Southern European welfare states: Between crisis and reforms. London, Frank Cass.
45. Rosanvallon, P. 1992. La crise de l’Etat providence. Paris, Seuil.
46. Salin, P. 2000. Libéralisme. Paris, O. Jacob.
47. Scheil-Adlung, X. (ed.). 2001. Building social security: The challenge of privatization. New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction Publishers; Geneva, International Social Security Association.
48. Sen, A. 1987. On ethics and economics. Oxford, Blackwell.
49. Sen, A. 1992. Inequality reexamined. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
50. Sen, A. 1999. Development as freedom. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
51. Siebert, H. (ed.). 1998. Redesigning social security. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck.
52. Sorman, G. 1984. La solution libérale. Paris, Fayard.
53. Tanner, M. 2000. “Saving” social security is not enough (Social Security Privatization papers, No. 20). Washington, DC, Cato Institute.
54. Tanzi, V. 1995. Taxation in an integrating world. Washington, DC, Brookings Institution.
55. Tanzi, V. 2000. Globalization and the future of social protection (IMF Working Paper, January). Washington, DC, International Monetary Fund.
56. Tanzi, V.; Schuknecht, L. 2000. Public spending in the 20th century: A global perspective. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
57. UNDP (various years). Human Development Report (annual publication). Paris, De Boeck; New York, United Nations Development Programme.
58. UNESCO. 1968. The right to be a man. Paris, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
59. Van Parijs, P. 1991. Qu’est-ce qu’une société juste? Paris, Seuil.
60. Van Parijs, P. 1995. Real freedom for all: What (if anything) can justify capitalism? Oxford, Oxford University Press.
61. Weaver, C. L. 1982. The crisis in social security: Economic and political origins. Durham, NC, Duke Press Policy Studies.
62. World Bank. 1994. Averting the old age crisis: Policies to protect the old and promote growth. New York, Oxford University Press.