The Need for Influence Theory and Actor-Specific Behavioral Models of Adversaries

Comparative Strategy

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 463-487

  George, Alexander L ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248054736     PISSN: 01495933     EISSN: 15210448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01495930390256527     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. David A. Baldwin, “The Power of Positive Sanctions,” World Politics vol. 24, no. 1 (1971), pp. 19-38.
2. A. L. George, “The Role of Force in Diplomacy: A Continuing Dilemma for U.S. Foreign Policy,” in H.W. Brands, ed., The Use of Force After the Cold War (College Station, TX: Texas A & M University Press, 2000), pp. 59-92.
3. Keith B. Payne, The Fallacies of Cold War Deterrence and a New Direction (Lexington, Kentucky: University of Kentucky Press, 2001).
4. Barry R. Schneider, Future War and Counterproliferation (Westport, Connecticut: Praeger, 1999).
5. Lawrence Freedman, ed., Strategic Coercion: Concepts and Cases (Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1998).
6. Peter Viggio Jakobsen, Western Use of Coercive Diplomacy After the Cold War (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998).
7. Donald C.F. Daniel and Bradd C. Hayes, Coercive Inducement and the Containment of International Crises (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Institute of Peace, 1999).
8. Janice Gross Stein, “Deterrence and Reassurance,” in Philip E. Tetlock, et al., Behavior, Society, and Nuclear War (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), pp. 8-72.
9. Gordon A. Craig and Alexander L. George, Force and Statecraft: Diplomatic Problems of Our Time (New York: Oxford University Press, Third Edition, 1995).
10. Robert S. Litwak, Rogue States and U.S. Foreign Policy (Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2000).
11. Henry Kissinger, A World Restored: Europe After Napoleon (Magnolia, MA: Peter Smith, 1973).
12. A.L. George, P.J. Farley, and A. Dallin, eds., U.S.-Soviet Security Cooperation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 702-707.
13. Thomas W. Milburn and Daniel J. Christie, “Rewarding in International Politics,” Political Psychology vol. 10, no. 4 (December 1989), pp. 625-645.
14. A.L. George, ed., Managing the U.S.-Soviet Rivalry (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1983).
15. A.L. George, “Domestic Constraints on Regime Change in U.S. Foreign Policy: The Need for Policy Legitimacy,” O.R. Holsti, R.M. Siverson, and A.L. George, eds., Change in the International System (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1980), pp. 233-262.
16. Stephen John Stedman, “Spoiler Problems in Peace Processes,” in Paul C. Stern and Daniel Druckman, eds., International Conflict Resolution After the Cold War, (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 2000)
17. A.L. George, D. Hall, and W.E. Simons, The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy (Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1971), p. xiv.
18. A.L. George and R. Smoke, Deterrence in American Foreign Policy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1974).
19. A.L. George, Presidential Decisionmaking in American Foreign Policy (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1980), p. 242.
20. Daniel L. Byman and Matthew C. Waxman, The Dynamics of Coercion: American Foreign Policy and the Limits of Military Might (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
21. Daniel L. Byman, Matthew C. Waxman, and Eric Larson, Air Power As A Coercive Instrument (Santa Monica, California: The RAND Corporation, 1999).
22. Paul R. Pillar, Terrorism and U.S. Foreign Policy (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 2001).
23. General Colin L. Powell, “U.S. Forces: Challenges Ahead,” Foreign Affairs vol. 71 (Winter 1992) pp. 19-93, 32-36
24. Policy-Relevant Theory and the Challenge of Diagnosis: The End of the Cold War,” Political Psychology vol. 15, no. 1 (March, 1994), pp. 111-142.
25. Richard K. Herrmann and Michael Fischerkeller, “Beyond the Enemy Images and Spiral Model: Cognitive-Strategic Research After the Cold War” International Security vol. 49, no. 3 (Summer 1995), pp. 15-450