History and Political Science: Together Again?

Journal of Policy History

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 126-136

  Zelizer, Julian E ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248051588     PISSN: 08980306     EISSN: 15284190     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/jph.2004.0012     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Charles Beard, An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States (New York, 1913).
2. Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr. The Coming of the New Deal (Boston, 1959)
3. Ellis Hawley, The New Deal and the Problem of Monopoly: A Study in Economic Ambivalence (Princeton, 1966)
4. Arthur F. Bentley, The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures (Chicago, 1908)
5. Louis Hartz, The Liberal Tradition in America: An Interpretation of American Political Thought Since the Revolution (New York, 1955).
6. Richard Hofstadter, The Age of Reform: From Bryan to F.D.R. (New York, 1955).
7. Gabriel Kolko, The Triumph of Conservatism: A Reinterpretation of American History, 1900—1916 (New York, 1963)
8. James Weinstein, The Corporate Ideal in the Liberal State, 1900-1918 (Boston, 1968).
9. Dorothy Ross, The Origins of American Social Science (Cambridge, 1991).
10. Martha Derthick, Policymaking for Social Security (Washington, D.C. 1979)
11. Hugh Heclo, Government of Strangers: Executive Politics in Washington (Washington, D.C. 1977)
12. James L. Sundquist, Politics and Policy: The Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson Years (Washington, D.C. 1968)
13. Michael P. Rogin, The Intellectuals and McCarthy: The Radical Specter (Cambridge, Mass. 1967).
14. Clifford Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays (New York, 1973).
15. Joel H. Silbey, Allan G. Bogue, and William H. Flanigan, eds. The History of American Electoral Behavior (Princeton, 1978).
16. Louis Galambos, “The Emerging Organizational Synthesis in Modern American History,” Business History Review 44 (1970): 279-90;
17. Idem, “Technology, Political Economy, and Professionalization,” Business History Review 57 (1983): 471–93.
18. Julian E. Zelizer, “Clio's Lost Tribe: Public Policy History Since 1978,” Journal of Policy History 12 (2000): 369–94.
19. Julian E. Zelizer, “Beyond the Presidential Synthesis: Reordering Political Time,” in A Companion to Post-1945 America, ed. Jean-Christophe Agnew and Roy Rosenzweig (Oxford, 2002), 345–70.
20. Julian E. Zelizer, “Stephen Skowronek's Building a New American State and the Origins of American Political Development,” Social Science History 27 (Fall 2003): 425-41.
21. Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol, eds. Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge, 1985)
22. Margaret Weir, Ann Shola Orloff, and Theda Skocpol, eds. The Politics of Social Policy in the United States (Princeton, 1988)
23. Richard Bensel, Sectionalism and American Political Development, 1880-1980 (Madison, 1984)
24. Stephen Skowronek, Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877-1920 (Cambridge, 1982)
25. Elizabeth M. Sanders, The Regulation of Natural Gas: Policy and Politics, 1938-1978 (Philadelphia, 1981)
26. Ira Katznelson, City Trenches: Urban Politics and the Patterning of Class in the United States (New York, 1981).
27. Stephen Skowronek, The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to George Bush (Cambridge, Mass. 1993).
28. Brian Balogh, Chain Reaction: Expert Debate and Public Participation in American Commercial Nuclear Power, 1945-1975 (Cambridge, 1991).
29. Edward D. Berkowitz, Disabled Policy: America's Program for the Handicapped (Cambridge, 1987)
30. Idem, America's Welfare State: From Roosevelt to Reagan (Baltimore, 1991)
31. Idem, Mr. Social Security: The Life of Wilbur J. Cohen (Lawrence, Kan. 1995).
32. Richard R. John, Spreading the News: The American Postal System from Franklin to Morse (Cambridge, Mass. 1995).
33. Julian E. Zelizer, Taxing America: Wilbur D. Mills, Congress, and the State, 1945-1975 (Cambridge, 1998).
34. Hugh Heclo, “Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment,” in The New American Political System, ed. Anthony King (Washington, D.C. 1978), 90-121;
35. John W. Kingdon, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (Boston, 1984)
36. Frank R. Baumgartner and Bryan D. Jones, Agendas and Instabilities in American Politics (Chicago, 1993).
37. Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, eds. Political Science: State of the Discipline (New York, 2002).
38. See, for example, Robert D. Putnam, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York, 2000)
39. Theda Skocpol and Morris P. Fiorina, eds. Civic Engagement in American Democracy (Washington, D.C. and New York, 1999).
40. Kat Lehman Schozman, “Citizen Participation in America: What Do We Know? Why Do We Care?” in Political Science, 433–61.
41. Michael C. Dawson, Black Visions: The Roots of Contemporary African American Political Ideologies (Chicago, 2001)
42. Idem, Behind the Mule: Race, Class, and African American Politics (Princeton, 2000)
43. Cathy J. Cohen, The Boundaries of Blackness: AIDS and the Breakdown of Black Politics (Chicago, 1999).
44. See, for example, Eric Oliver, Democracy in Suburbia (Princeton, 2001).
45. Jennifer L. Hochschild, Facing Up to the American Dream (Princeton, 1995)
46. Robert C. Lieberman, Shifting the Color Line: Race and the American Welfare State (Cambridge, Mass. 1998)
47. Rogers M. Smith, Civic Ideals: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U.S. History (New Haven, 1997)
48. Martin Gilens, Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy (Chicago, 1999).
49. Michael C. Dawson and Cathy Cohen, “Problems in the Study of the Politics of Race,” in Political Science, 488–510.
50. Jeffry Frieden and Lisa L. Martin, “International Political Economy: Global and Domestic Interactions,” in Political Science, 118–46.
51. Daniel T. Rodgers, Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Era (Cambridge, 1998).
52. Paul Pierson, Politics in Time (Princeton, forthcoming, 2004).
53. Some notable exceptions by historians that look into their craft include Peter Novick, That Noble Dream: The ‘Objectivity Question and the American Historical Profession (Cambridge, 1988)
54. Joyce Appleby, Lynn Hunt, and Margaret Jacobs, Telling the Truth About History (New York, 1994)
55. John Higham, History: Professional Scholarship in America, rev. ed. (Baltimore, 1983)
56. J. G. A. Pocock, Politics, Language, and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History (Chicago, 1989)
57. Marc Bloch, Historian's Craft (New York, 1953).
58. See, for examples, Pierson, Politics in Time;
59. Richard Bensel, “Of Rules and Speakers: Toward a Theory of Institutional Change for the U.S. House of Representatives,” Social Science History 24 (Summer 2000): 349—66;
60. Elizabeth S. Clemens and James M. Cook, “Politics and Institutionalism: Explaining Durability and Change,” Annual Review of Sociology 25 (1999): 441—66;
61. Karen Orren and Stephen Skowronek, “Regimes and Regime Building in American Government: A Review of Literature on the 1940s,” Political Science Quarterly 113 (1998-1999): 689–702.
62. See, for example, Julian E. Zelizer, On Capitol Hill: The Struggle to Reform Congress and Its Consequences, 19-48-2000 (Cambridge, 2004).
63. David R. Mayhew, “Supermajority Rule in the U.S. Senate,” PS: Political Science & Politics 26 (January 2003): 31—36.
64. Pierson, Politics in Time.
65. Novick, That Noble Dream.