The Use of Force in a Changing World–US and European Perspectives

Leiden Journal of International Law

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 171-180

  Daalder, Ivo H ^a  

^a BROOKINGS INSTITUTION   (United States)

Author keywords

globalization; pre emptive strike doctrine; sovereignty; terrorism; Use of force

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248048700     PISSN: 09221565     EISSN: 14789698     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0922156503001092     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Quoted in Glenn Kessler andWalter Pincus, ‘Fear of US Power Shapes Iraq Debate’,Washington Post, 30 Oct. 2002, A16.
2. ‘Interview on CNN's Late Edition’, 15 Sept. 2002, available at: http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/ 2002/13481.htm (accessed Nov. 2002).
3. Cf. Robert Kagan, ‘Power andWeakness’, Policy Review, June/July 2002, 3-28.
4. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America (Washington, 2002), 15, available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.pdf (accessed November 2002).
5. Kofi Annan, ‘Two Concepts of Sovereignty’, The Economist, 19 Sept. 1999.
6. National Security Strategy, ‘Two Concepts of Sovereignty’ note 4, 15.
7. National Security Strategy.
8. I borrow the distinction from Bernard Brodie, Strategy in the Missile Age (Princeton, 1959), 225 n.241.
9. Quoted in James Harding, ‘Albright laments “rash exuberance” over Iraq’, Financial Times (US edn), 27 Sept. 2002, 2.
10. National Security Strategy, ‘Albright laments “rash exuberance” over Iraq’ note 4, 15.
11. Annan, National Security Strategy note 5.
12. ‘Note by the President of the Security Council’, S/23500 (31 Jan. 1992).