Pension reform in the EU accession countries: Challenges, achievements and pitfalls

International Social Security Review

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 3-24

  Fultz, Elaine ^a  

^a International Labour Office   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248046889     PISSN: 0020871X     EISSN: 1468246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-246X.2004.00185.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Augusztinovics, M.; Gál, R.; Matits, A.; Máté, L.; Simonovits, A.; Stahl, J. 2002. “The Hun gar ian pen sion sys tem before and after the 1998 reform”, in E. Fultz (ed.), Pension reform in cen tral and eastern Europe (Vol. 1). Budapest, Inter national Labour Office.
2. Barr, N. 2000. Reforming pensions: Myths, truths, and policy choices (IMF Working Paper WP/00/139). Washington, DC, Inter national Monetary Fund.
3. Beattie, R.; McGillivray, R. 1995. “A risky strategy: Reflections on the World Bank report Averting the old age crisis”, in International Social Security Review, Vol. 48, No. 3–4.
4. Chloń-Domińczak, A. 2002. “The Polish pension reform of 1999”, in E. Fultz (ed.), Pension reform in central and eastern Europe (Vol. 1). Budapest, International Labour Office.
5. Cichon, M.; Hagemejer, K.; Ruck, M. 1998. Social protection and pension systems in central and eastern Europe. Budapest, International Labour Office.
6. Cichon, M.; Hagemejer, K.; Scholz, W. 2001. “Social budgeting in transition economies”, in International Social Security Review, Vol. 54, No. 2–3.
7. Cichon, M. (ed.). 1995. Social protection in the Visegrad countries: Four country profiles. Budapest, International Labour Office.
8. ECE. 1999. Economic survey of Europe (1999/3). Geneva, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
9. European Commission. 2003. Social protection systems in the 13 candidate countries. Also available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/soc-prot/social/index_en.htm (visited on 14 January 2004).
10. Fultz, E.; Ruck, M. 2001. Pension reform in central and eastern Europe: An update on the restructuring of national pension schemes in selected countries (ILO CEET Policy Paper No. 25). Budapest, Inter national Labour Office.
11. Fultz, E. (ed.). 2002a. Pension reform in central and eastern Europe, Volume 1: Restructuring with privatization: Case studies of Hun gary and Poland. Budapest, International Labour Office.
12. Fultz, E. (ed.). 2002b. Pension reform in central and eastern Europe, Volume 2: Restructuring public pension schemes: Case studies of the Czech Republic and Slovenia. Budapest, International Labour Office.
13. Fultz, E.; Ruck, M. (eds.). 2002. Reforming worker protections: Disability pensions in transformation. Budapest, International Labour Office.
14. Fultz, E.; Ruck, M.; Steinhilber, S. (eds.). 2003. The gender dimensions of social security reform in central and eastern Europe: Case studies of Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Poland. Budapest, International Labour Office.
15. Gál, R.; Simonovits, A.; Tarcali, G. 2001. Generational accounting and Hungarian pension reform (Social Protection Discussion Paper No. 0127). Washington, DC, World Bank.
16. Gillion, C.; Turner, J.; Bailey, C.; Latulippe, D. 2000. Social security pensions: Development and reform. Geneva, International Labour Office.
17. Government of Turkey. 2002. Pre-accession economic programme 2002–Republic of Turkey. Ankara.
18. Holzmann, R.; Orenstein, M.; Rutkwoski, M. 2000. Pension reform in Europe: Process and progress. Washington, DC, World Bank.
19. ILO. 1997. Republic of Cyprus: Report to the Government, Actuarial valuation of the social insurance scheme as of 1 July 1997. Geneva, Inter national Labour Office.
20. ILO. 2000. World Labour Report 2000: Income security and social protection in a changing world. Geneva, International Labour Office.
21. ILO. 2001a. Actuarial valuation of the pension scheme operated by the Human Resource Development Authority of Cyprus as of 31 December 2000: A technical note. Geneva, International Labour Office.
22. ILO. 2001b. Social security: A new consensus. Geneva, Social Security Department, International Labour Office.
23. Inter national Network of Pension Regulators and Supervisors. 2002. Regulation of pension fund investment in CEE countries (12 December).
24. ISSA. 1996. Social security financing: Issues and perspectives (Inter national Conference of Social Security Actuaries and Statisticians, Athens, June 1995). Geneva, Inter national Social Security Association.
25. Mácha, M. 2002. “The political economy of pension reform in the Czech Republic”, in E. Fultz (ed.), Pension reform in central and eastern Europe (Vol. 2). Budapest, Inter national Labour Office.
26. McGillivray, W. R.; Karasyov, D. 2001. Note on social security pension scheme systems of contributions collection. Geneva, International Social Security Association.
27. Müller, K. 1999. The political economy of pension reform in central-eastern Europe. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
28. Müller, K. 2002. “Between state and market: Czech and Slovene pension reform in comparison”, in E. Fultz (ed.), Pension reform in central and eastern Europe (Vol. 2). Budapest, Inter national Labour Office.
29. Müller, K. 2003a. Pension reform in the East European accession countries (manuscript).
30. Müller, K. 2003b. Privatising old-age security: Latin America and eastern Europe compared. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
31. Müller, K.; Ryll, A.; Wagener, H. J. 1999. Trans formation of social security: Pensions in central-eastern Europe. Frankfurt (Oder), Physica-Verlag.
32. Palacious, R.; Rutkowski, M.; Yu, X. 1999. Pension reform in transition economies. Washington, DC, World Bank.
33. Orszag, P. R.; Stiglitz, J. E. 2001. “Rethinking pension reform: Ten myths about social security systems”, in R. Holzmann and J. E. Stiglitz (eds.), New ideas about old age security. Washington, DC, World Bank.
34. Pensions International. 2003. “Bulgaria: Funds show only slight growth” (March).
35. Queisser, M. 1999. “Towards more individual choice in social protection?”, in Modernising and improving social protection by redistributing responsibilities (Social Security Documentation, European Series, No. 27). Geneva, International Social Security Association.
36. Rys, V. 2001. “Transition countries of central Europe entering the European Union: Some social protection issues”, in International Social Security Review, Vol. 54, No. 2–3.
37. Sarfati, H.; Bonoli, G. (eds.). 2002. Labour market and social protection reforms in international perspective. Geneva, International Social Security Association; Aldershot, Ashgate.
38. Samuel, L. 1994. Cyprus: The challenge of tripartism in social governance. Budapest, International Labour Office.
39. Schmähl, W.; Horstmann, S. (eds.). 2002. Transformation of pension systems in central Europe. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.
40. Standing, G. 2000. Globalization and flexibility: Dancing around pensions. Geneva, International Labour Office.
41. Stanovnik, T. 2002. “The political economy of pension reform in Slovenia”, in E. Fultz (ed.), Pension reform in central and eastern Europe (Vol. 2). Budapest, International Labour Office.
42. Stanovnik, T. 2003. Social security in European countries in transition: Are there les sons to be learned? (paper pre pared for the ILO Employment Forum). Beijing.
43. Thompson, L. 1998. Older and wiser: The economics of public pensions. Washington, DC, Urban Institute Press.
44. Thompson, L. 2000. Adjusting pensions for social and demo graphic changes: The need for truth in packaging (paper pre pared for the Conference of the European Institute of Social Security). Gothenburg.
45. World Bank. 1994. Averting the old age crisis: Policies to protect the old and promote growth. New York, Oxford University Press.
46. World Bank. 2000. “Participation in policy formulation and implementation: Pension reform in Poland”, in Participation in macro economics: Case studies. Washington, DC.