-
1
-
-
0004215813
-
-
(Oxford: Oxford University Press,); Q. Skinner, Liberty Before Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998); M. Viroli, Republicanism (New York: Hill and Wang, 2002).
-
See P. Pettit, Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997); Q. Skinner, Liberty Before Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998); M. Viroli, Republicanism (New York: Hill and Wang, 2002).
-
(1997)
Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government
-
-
Pettit, P.1
-
2
-
-
0038759392
-
-
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
-
A. Brett, Liberty, Right and Nature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
-
(1998)
Liberty, Right and Nature
-
-
Brett, A.1
-
3
-
-
84992767381
-
-
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
-
Q. Skinner, Visions of Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), III: p. 225.
-
(2002)
Visions of Politics
, vol.3
, pp. 225
-
-
Skinner, Q.1
-
5
-
-
0040936835
-
-
(Indianapolis: Hackett
-
T. Hobbes, Leviathan (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994).
-
(1994)
Leviathan
-
-
Hobbes, T.1
-
6
-
-
0002317315
-
Human Nature and De Corpore Politico: The Elements of Law
-
(Oxford: Oxford University Press
-
T. Hobbes, Human Nature and De Corpore Politico: The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994).
-
(1994)
Natural and Politic
-
-
Hobbes, T.1
-
7
-
-
0011292571
-
-
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
-
T. Hobbes, On the Citizen (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
-
(1998)
On the Citizen
-
-
Hobbes, T.1
-
9
-
-
84992767371
-
-
True, as Skinner, Visions of Politics, notes, there is a passage in The Elements of Law where Hobbes takes a softer line on Aristotle on liberty than he does later, but, as we shall see, this does not appear to signal a radically different attitude.
-
There are differences between The Elements of Law (EL), De Cive (DC), Leviathan (L), and Hobbes's exchange with Bramhall (HB), but none, I think, that deeply affects the account I offer. True, as Skinner, Visions of Politics, p. 227 notes, there is a passage in The Elements of Law where Hobbes takes a softer line on Aristotle on liberty than he does later, but, as we shall see, this does not appear to signal a radically different attitude.
-
There are differences between The Elements of Law (EL), De Cive (DC), Leviathan (L), and Hobbes's exchange with Bramhall (HB), but none, I think, that deeply affects the account I offer
, pp. 227
-
-
-
12
-
-
84992910771
-
he is free, that can be free when he will: Nor is it possible for any person to be bound himself; because he that can bind, can release; and therefore he that is bound to himselfe onely, is not bound
-
Hobbes makes the point most explicitly in Leviathan, Section 2
-
Brett, Liberty, Right and Nature, p. 212. Hobbes makes the point most explicitly in Leviathan, Ch. 26, Section 2: ‘he is free, that can be free when he will: Nor is it possible for any person to be bound himself; because he that can bind, can release; and therefore he that is bound to himselfe onely, is not bound’.
-
Brett, Liberty, Right and Nature
, Issue.26
, pp. 212
-
-
-
13
-
-
84992848890
-
as delivered in the word of God
-
but as noted by the editor, this sentence was omitted from the later Latin edition (L: 100-1). See also Hobbes, Human Nature and De Corpore Politico
-
Hobbes says in the English edition of Leviathan that, considered ‘as delivered in the word of God’, natural laws may be ‘properly called laws’, but as noted by the editor, Edwin Curly, this sentence was omitted from the later Latin edition (L: 100-1). See also Hobbes, Human Nature and De Corpore Politico, p. 97.
-
Hobbes says in the English edition of Leviathan that, considered, natural laws may be ‘properly called laws’
, pp. 97
-
-
Curly, E.1
-
14
-
-
84992778511
-
the voluntary offer of subjection, and yielding by compulsion
-
Skinner, Visions of Politics, of mentions as one indication of a different view in the earlier work that Hobbes there distinguishes between (EL: 126). But that distinction, motivated as it is by taxonomic purposes, should not be taken to suggest that Hobbes thinks that the fear activated by compulsion makes an act of submission less than voluntary; he does not think that, as the quotation in the text clearly shows.
-
As suggested earlier, I disagree with Quentin Skinner in thinking that there is no major shift in Hobbes's thinking about liberty between The Elements of Law, written in 1640, and later works. Skinner, Visions of Politics, p. 236 of vol. III mentions as one indication of a different view in the earlier work that Hobbes there distinguishes between ‘the voluntary offer of subjection, and yielding by compulsion’ (EL: 126). But that distinction, motivated as it is by taxonomic purposes, should not be taken to suggest that Hobbes thinks that the fear activated by compulsion makes an act of submission less than voluntary; he does not think that, as the quotation in the text clearly shows.
-
As suggested earlier, I disagree with Quentin Skinner in thinking that there is no major shift in Hobbes's thinking about liberty between The Elements of Law, written in 1640, and later works
, vol.3
, pp. 236
-
-
-
15
-
-
84992909317
-
-
Right and Nature.
-
Brett, Liberty, Right and Nature.
-
Brett, Liberty
-
-
-
18
-
-
84992918660
-
Water. when it is open on all sides spreads; and the more outlets it finds the freer it is
-
This latter point, too, is suggested by the analogy. (DC: 151).
-
The obstacles may affect what the agent can do on a narrower or wider front. This latter point, too, is suggested by the analogy. ‘Water. when it is open on all sides spreads; and the more outlets it finds the freer it is’ (DC: 151).
-
The obstacles may affect what the agent can do on a narrower or wider front
-
-
-
23
-
-
0003988298
-
-
But see (Oxford: Blackwell,) and I. Carter, A Measure of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).
-
But see H. Steiner, An Essay on Rights (Oxford: Blackwell, 1994) and I. Carter, A Measure of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).
-
(1994)
An Essay on Rights
-
-
Steiner, H.1
|