Taking stock of multi-level governance networks

European Political Science

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 316-327

  Papadopoulos, Yannis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

democracy; efficiency; legitimacy; multi level governance; public policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248042382     PISSN: 16804333     EISSN: 16820983     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210032     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Auel K. (forthcoming). Multilevel Governance, Regional Policy, and Democratic Legitimacy in Germany. in A. Benz, and Y. Papadopoulos (eds.), Governance, and Democracy: Comparing National, European, and International Experiences, London: Routledge
2. Bache I. (2004). Multi-Level Governance, and European Union Regional Policy. in I. Bache, and M. Flinders (eds.), Multi-Level Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 165-178
3. Bang H.P., and Dyrberg T.B. (2000). Governance, Self-representation, and Democratic Imagination. in M. Saward (ed.), Democratic Innovation, London, and NewY ork: Routledge, pp. 146-157
4. Bendor J., Glazer A., and Hammond T. (2001). Theories of Delegation. Annual Review of Political Science IV, 235-269
5. Benz A. (1998). Postparlamentarische Demokratie: Demokratische Legitimation im kooperativen Staat. in M. Th. Greven (ed.), Demokratie -eine Kultur des Westens?, Opladen: Leske, and Budrich, pp. 201-222
6. Benz A., and Papadopoulos Y. (forthcoming). Actors, institutions, and democratic governance: Comparing across levels. in A. Benz, and Y. Papadopoulos (eds.), Governance, and Democracy: Comparing National, European, and International Experiences, London: Routledge
7. Bovens M. (1998). The Quest for Responsibility, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
8. Eberlein B., and Kerwer D. (2004). New Governance in the European Union: A Theoretical Perspective. Journal of Common Market Studies 42(1): 121-142
9. Frey B., and Eichenberger R. (1999). The New Democratic Federalism for Europe: Functional, Overlapping, and Competing Jurisdictions, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
10. Gaudin J.P. (1995). Politiques urbaines et négociations territoriales: quelle légitimité pour les réseaux De politiques publiques. Revue francaise De science politique 45(1): 31-55
11. Heinelt H., Kopp-Malet T., Lang J., and Reissert B. (2003). Policy-Making in Fragmented Systems: How to Explain Success. in B. Kohler-Koch (ed.), Linking EU, and National Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 135-153
12. Heritier A. (1999). Policy-Making, and Diversity in Europe. Escaping Deadlock, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
13. Hooghe L., and Marks G. (2003). Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance. American Political Science Review 97(2): 233-243
14. Jessop B. (2004). Multi-Level Governance, and Multi-Level Meta-Governance. in I. Bache, and M. Flinders (eds.), Multi-Level Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 49-74
15. Kersbergen K.van, and Waarden F. Van (2004). Governance as a Bridge Between Disciplines: Crossdisciplinary Inspiration Regarding Shifts in Governance, and Problems of Governability, Accountability, and Legitimacy. European Journal of Political Research 43(2): 143-171
16. Kohler-Koch B. (2003). Interdependent European Governance. in B. Kohler-Koch (ed.), Linking EU, and National Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 10-23
17. Kooiman J. (1993). Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions, London: Sage
18. Kriesi H. (1990). Federalism, and Pillarization: The Netherlands, and Switzerland Compared. Acta Politica XXV, 433-450
19. Lehmbruch G. (1996). Die korporative Verhandlungsdemokratie in Westmitteleuropa. Swiss Political Science Review 2(4): 19-41
20. Lijphart (1974). Democracy in Plural Societies, NewHaven : Yale University Press
21. Lord C. (2004). A Democratic Audit of the European Union, London: Palgrave
22. Marks G., and Hooghe L. (1996). European Integration From the 1980s: State-centric versus multi-level governance. Journal of Common Market Studies 34(3): 341-378
23. Mayntz R. (1997). Politische Steuerung: Aufstieg, Niedergang und Transformation einer Theorie. in R. Mayntz (ed.), Soziale Dynamik und Politische Steuerung. Theoretische und methodologische Ueberlegungen, Frankfurt am Main, and NewY ork: Campus, pp. 263-292
24. Offe C. (1981). The Attribution of Public Status to Interest Groups. in S. Berger (ed.), Organized Interests in Western Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 123-158
25. Offerlé, M. (1994). Sociologie des groupes dintérêt, Paris: Montchrestien
26. Padioleau J.G. (1981). Quand la France senferre, Paris: Presses universitaires De France
27. Papadopoulos Y. (2003). Cooperative Forms of Governance: Problems of Democratic Accountability in Complex Environments. European Journal of Political Research 42(4): 473-501
28. Peters B.G. (1998). Globalization, Institutions, and Governance. Jean Monnet Chair Paper 51, Robert Schuman Centre, Florence: European University Institute
29. Peters B.G. (2000). Governance, and Comparative Politics. in J. Pierre (ed.), Debating Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 36-53
30. Rhodes R.A.W. (2000). Governance, and Public Administration. in J. Pierre (ed.), Debating Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 54-90
31. Scharpf F.W. (1988). The Joint-Decision Trap: Lessons From German Federalism, and European Integration. Public Administration 66(2): 239-278
32. Scharpf F.W. (2000). Notes Towards a Theory of Multilevel Governing in Europe. Discussion Paper 00/5, Cologne: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung
33. Schmitter P.C., and Streeck W. (1999). The Organization of Business Interests. Studying the Associative Action of Business in Advanced Industrial Societies. Discussion Paper 99/1, Cologne: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung
34. Schneider V. (2000). Organisationsstaat und Verhandlungsdemokratie. in R. Werle, and U. Schimank (eds.), Gesellschaftliche Komplexität und kollektive Handlungsfähigkeit, Frankfurt am Main: Campus, pp. 243-269
35. Skelcher C. (2005). Jurisdictional Integrity, Polycentrism, and the Design of Democratic Governance. Governance 18(1): 89-110
36. Sunstein C. (2001). Republic.com, Princeton: Princeton University Press
37. Taiclet A.F. (forthcoming). Governance, Expertise, and Competitive Politics: The Case of Territorial Development Policies in France. in A. Benz, and Y. Papadopoulos (eds). Governance, and Democracy: Comparing National, European, and International Experiences, London: Routledge
38. Wälti S., and Kübler D. (2003). NewGove rnance. and Associative Pluralism: The Case of Drug Policy in Swiss Cities. The Policy Studies Journal 31(4): 499-525
39. Wälti S., Kübler D., and Papadopoulos Y. (2004). HowDemocratic is Governance? Lessons from Swiss Drug Policy. Governance 17(1): 83-113