Two Realist Readings of the Tragic in International Relations

International Relations

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 225-230

  Warner, Daniel ^a  

^a GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248040074     PISSN: 00471178     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0047117806063850     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Richard Ned Lebow, The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests and Orders (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
2. John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W. W. Norton, 2001).
3. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, p. 3.
4. Daniel Warner, An Ethic of Responsibility in International Relations (Boulder, CO and London: Lynne Rienner, 1991), pp. 73–74.
5. Steven Lukes, ‘Methodological Individualism Reconsidered’, British Journal of Sociology, 19, 1968, pp. 119–29.
6. Hidemi Suganami, The Domestic Analogy and World Order Proposals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).
7. Lebow, The Tragic Vision of Politics, p. 307.
8. Lebow, The Tragic Vision of Politics, p. 309.
9. Lebow, The Tragic Vision of Politics, p. 385.
10. Lebow, The Tragic Vision of Politics, p. 364.
11. John Mearsheimer, ‘Conversations in International Relations: Interview with John J. Mearsheimer (Part II)’, International Relations, this issue, p. 242.
12. Lebow, The Tragic Vision of Politics, p. 319.
13. John Mearsheimer, ‘Conversations in International Relations: Interview with John J. Mearsheimer (Part I)’, International Relations, 20(1), p. 114.
14. Mearsheimer, ‘Conversations (Part I)’, p. 119.