Comparing Political Institutions: Revealing the Gendered “Logic of Appropriateness”

Politics and Gender

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 223-235

  Chappell, Louise ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248036208     PISSN: 1743923X     EISSN: 17439248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X06221044     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Acker, Joan. 1992.“From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions.” Contemporary Sociology 21 (5):565–69.
2. L.A., Banaszak, Lee Ann, Why Movements Succeed or Fail: Opportunities, Culture and the Struggle for Woman Suffrage, Princeton, Princeton University Press, (1996)
3. Banaszak, Lee Ann, Karen Beckwith, and Dieter Rucht, eds.2003. Women's Movements Facing the Reconfigured State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. K., Beckwith, Karen, Beyond Compare? Women's Movements in Comparative Perspective, European Journal of Political Research, (2000), 37, 4, 31-68
5. Beckwith, Karen. 2005.“A Common Language of Gender?” Politics & Gender 1 (March):128–37.
6. C., Burton, Clare, The Promise and the Price: The Struggle for Equal Opportunity in Women's Employment, Sydney, Allen and Unwin, (1991)
7. J.L., Campbell, John L., Social Movements and Organization Theory, Where Do We Stand? Common Mechanisms in Organizations and Social Movement Research, Doug, McAdam, Gerald F., Davis, W. Richard, Scott, Mayer, Zald, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, (2005), 41-68
8. L., Chappell, Louise, Gendering Government: Feminist Engagement with the State in Australia and Canada, Vancouver, University of British Columbia Press, (2002)
9. L., Chappell, Louise, Women, Politics and Change, The ‘Femocrat’ Strategy: Expanding the Repertoire of Feminist Activists, Karen, Ross, Oxford, Oxford University Press, (2002)
10. L., Chappell, Louise, The Politics of Women's Interests: New Comparative Perspectives, ‘Women's Interests’ as ‘Women's Rights’: Developments at the UN Criminal Tribunals and the International Criminal Court, Louise, Chappell, Lisa, Hill, London, Routledge, (2006)
11. H., Charlesworth, Hilary, Not Waving but Drowning: Gender Mainstreaming and Human Rights in the United Nations, Harvard Human Rights Journal, (2005), 18, 1, 1-18
12. S., Childs, Sarah, In Her Own Words: New Labour Women and the Substantive Representation of Women, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, (2001), 3, 2, 171-190
13. Davis, Gerald F., Doug McAdam, W. Richard Scott, and Mayer Zald, eds.2005. Social Movements and Organization Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. A., Dobrowolsky, Alexandra, Women's Movements Facing the Reconfigured State, Women's Constitutional Organizing Across Time and Space, Lee Ann, Banaszak, Karen, Beckwith, Dieter, Rucht, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, (2003), 114-140
15. A., Dobrowolsky, Alexandra, V., Hart, Vivien, Women Making Constitutions: New Politics and Comparative Perspectives, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, (2003)
16. Eisenstein, Hester. 1996. Inside Agitators: Australian Femocrats and the State. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
17. S., Findlay, Sue, Feminism and Political Economy, ‘Facing the State’: The Politics of the Women's Movement Reconsidered, H., Maroney, M., Luxton, Toronto, Methuen, (1987)
18. M., Freeman, Marsha, International Institutions and Gendered Justice, Journal of International Affairs, Spring, (1999), 52, 513-532
19. E.J., Friedman, Elisabeth Jay, Gendering the Agenda: The Impact of the Transnational Women's Rights Movement at the UN Conferences of the 1990 s, Women's Studies International Forum, (2003), 26, 4, 313-331
20. A., Gallagher, Anne, Ending the Marginalisation: Strategies for Incorporating Women into the UN Human Rights System, Human Rights Quarterly, (1997), 19, 2, 283-332
21. J., Gelb, Joyce, Gender Policies in Japan and the United States: Comparing Women's Movements, Rights and Politics, New York, Palgrave Macmillan, (2003)
22. L., Geller-Schwartz, Linda, Comparative State Feminism, An Array of Agencies: Feminism and the State in Canada, Dorothy McBride, Stetson, Amy G., Mazur, New York, Sage, (1995)
23. P., Hall, Peter, Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France, Oxford, Oxford University Press, (1986)
24. M., Hawkesworth, Mary, Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Toward a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions, American Political Science Review, (2003), 97, 4, 1214-1229
25. M.F., Katzenstein, Mary Fainsod, Faithful and Fearless: Moving Feminist Protest inside the Church and Military, Princeton, Princeton University Press, (1998)
26. K., Kernaghan, Kenneth, Regional Responsiveness and the National Administrative State, Representative and Responsive Bureaucracy, Peter, Aucoin, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, (1985)
27. Kingdon, John. 2003. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 3d ed. New York: Longman.
28. Lovenduski, Joni. 1998.“Gendering Research in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 1: 333–56.
29. J.G., March, James G., J.P., Olsen, Johan P., Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York, Free Press, (1989)
30. D., McAdam, Doug, W.R., Scott, W. Richard, Social Movements and Organization Theory, Organizations and Movements, Doug, McAdam, Gerald F., Davis, W. Richard, Scott, Mayer, Zald, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, (2005), 4-40
31. Miller, J. D. B. 1964. Australian Government and Politics: An Introductory Survey. 3d ed. London: Gerald Duckworth.
32. B.G., Peters, B. Guy, Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism, London, Pinter, (1999)
33. Phillips, Anne. 1998. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Research Network on Gender, and the State (RNGS). 2005. RNGS Project Description. http://libarts.wsu.edu/polisci/rngs/pdf/project505.pdf(October 28, 2005).
35. Savage, Mike, and Anne Witz, eds.1992. Gender and Bureaucracy. Oxford: Blackwell.
36. Sawer, Marian. 1990. Sisters in Suits: Women and Public Policy in Australia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
37. M., Sawer, Marian, The Role of National Mechanisms in Promoting Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women: Achievements, Gaps and Challenges, Gender Equality in the Age of Governing for the Mainstream, Rome, United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women (DAW), (2004)
38. T., Skocpol, Theda, Bringing the State Back In, Bringing the State Back In: Strategies and Analysis of Current Research, Peter, Evans, Dietrich, Rueschemeyer, Theda, Skocpol, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, (1985)
39. S., Steinmo, Sven, K., Thelen, Kathleen, F., Longstreth, Frank, Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, (1992)
40. C., Stivers, Camilla, Gender Images in Public Administration: Legitimacy and the Administrative State, Newbury Park, CA, Sage, (1993)
41. K., Thelen, Kathleen, S., Steinmo, Sven, Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Institutionalism in Comparative Politics, Sven, Steinmo, Kathleen, Thelen, Frank, Longstreth, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, (1992), 1-32
42. J., Vickers, Jill, The Politics of Women's Interests: New Comparative Perspectives, The Problem with Interests: Making Political Claims for ‘Women.’, Louise, Chappell, Lisa, Hill, London, Routledge, (2006)