-
1
-
-
34248005753
-
Studies in Scientific Collaboration Part I, The Professional Origins of Scientific Co-authorship
-
(1978)
Scientometrics
, vol.1
, Issue.1
, pp. 65-84
-
-
Beaver, D.1
Rosen, R.2
-
3
-
-
34248005753
-
Studies in Scientific Collaboration Part I, The Professional Origins of Scientific Co-authorship
-
(1978)
Scientometrics
, vol.1
, Issue.1
, pp. 65-84
-
-
Beaver, D.1
Rosen, R.2
-
5
-
-
84933243531
-
-
D. CRANE, Collaboration, Communication and Influence: A study of the Effects of Formal and Informal Collaboration among Scientists, mimeo, 1969, p. 1.
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
84933243528
-
-
It may be of some interest to note, however, that of the patents cited in Chemical Abstracts for 1970, 40% were jointly held.
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
84933243541
-
-
H. ZUCKERMAN, Nobel Laureates in the United States: A Sociological Study of Scientific Collaboration, unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Columbia University, 1965, p. 80.
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
84933243540
-
-
The percentage displayed by Zeitschrift may reflect either the shift of center of gravity of research to the U.S., or the possibility it isn't a core journal. Absent from these statistics are French journals, which we have not examined. Our theory, however, would lead us to predict that the relatively depressed state of science in France “in the age of the scientific state” would result in its best journals exhibiting a below average frequency of teamwork.
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
84933243539
-
-
Cf. H. ZUCKERMAN, op. cit., Nobel Laureates in the United States: A Sociological Study of Scientific Collaboration, unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Columbia University, 1965, p. 78, 79, 83, 94.
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
0015493305
-
Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation
-
Fig. 4
-
(1972)
Science
, vol.178
, pp. 474
-
-
Garfield, E.1
-
13
-
-
84933243536
-
-
For this figure, we are aware that the conflation of statistics from different sources represents a potential methodological difficulty, but are convinced that whatever degree of mismatching may exist is trivial. We have tried different weightings of the abstracting literature statistics, with virtually indistinguishable results. What is particularly interesting is the possibility that these data depict a logistic curve, already abundantly testified to in studies of the science of science; if so, the growth of collaboration is rapidly approaching its saturation limit.
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
84933243564
-
-
H. ZUCKERMAN, op. cit., Nobel Laureates in the United States: A Sociological Study of Scientific Collaboration, unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Columbia University, 1965, p. 62.
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
84933243566
-
-
Cf. H. ZUCKERMAN, op. cit., Nobel Laureates in the United States: A Sociological Study of Scientific Collaboration, unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, Columbia University, 1965, p. 106–107; also I. H. PAGE, Some Perils of Authorship, Science, 144 (April 10, 1964), editorial.
-
-
-
-
32
-
-
84933243565
-
-
The relative insulation of the U.S. from the locations of combat masks the effect for the abstracting journals particularly for World War I; the effect is most pronounced for the European journals counted directly.
-
-
-
-
33
-
-
84933243552
-
-
W. HIRSCH, J. F. SINGLETON, Research Support, Multiple Authorship and Publication in Sociological Journal, 1936–1964, unpublished preprint, 1965, p. 1.
-
-
-
-
35
-
-
4744343935
-
Science Citation Index, a New Concept in Indexing
-
(1964)
Science
, vol.144
, pp. 649-654
-
-
Garfield, E.1
-
36
-
-
84933243549
-
-
For other distinctions between science and technology, see D. deS. PRICE, The Difference Between Science and Technology, published by the Thomas Alva Edison Foundation 1968; M. KRANZBERG, The Disunity of Science-Technology, American Scientists, 56 (Spring, 1968) 21–34, and N. W. STORER, op. cit., p. 91–97.
-
-
-
|