Whole-genome array comparative genome hybridization: The preferred diagnostics choice in postnatal clinical cytogenetics [1]

Journal of Molecular Diagnostics

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 277-

  Veltman, Joris A ^a   de Vries, Bert B A ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME BANDING PATTERN; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; CYTOGENETICS; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DNA MICROARRAY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC COUNSELING; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; PATIENT CARE; PERINATAL PERIOD; TIME; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETICS; GENOME; NEWBORN; NOTE; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; POSTNATAL CARE;

CYTOGENETICS; GENETIC SCREENING; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; POSTNATAL CARE;

EID: 34247890199     PISSN: 15251578     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2007.060187     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Bejjani BA, Shaffer LG: Application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization to clinical diagnostics. J Mol Diagn 2006, 8:528-533
2. Veltman JA, de Vries BB: Diagnostic genome profiling: unbiased whole genome or targeted analysis? J Mol Diagn 2006, 8:534-537
3. Bejjani BA, Shaffer LG: Targeted array CGH. J Mol Diagn 2006, 8:537-539
4. Seabright M: A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 1971, 2:971-972
5. Smeets DF: Historical prospective of human cytogenetics: from microscope to microarray. Clin Biochem 2004, 37:439-446