Accuracy of pulse oximetry in screening for congenital heart disease in asymptomatic newborns: A systematic review

Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal and Neonatal Edition

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2007, Pages

  Thangaratinam, Shakila ^a   Daniels, Jane ^a   Ewer, Andrew K ^b   Zamora, Javier ^c   Khan, Khalid S ^a  

^a BIRMINGHAM WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONGENITAL HEART DISEASE; DATA BASE; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; OXYGEN SATURATION; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE OXIMETRY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; NEONATAL SCREENING; OXIMETRY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 34247882564     PISSN: 13592998     EISSN: 14682052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/adc.2006.107656     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Knowles R, Griebsch I, Dezateux C, et al. Newborn screening for congenital heart defects: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess 2005;9:1-168.
2. Wren C, Richardson S, Donaldson L. Temporal variability in the birth prevalence of cardiovascular malformations. Heart 2000;83:414-9.
3. Kuehl KS, Loffredo CA, Ferenez C. Failure to diagnose congenital heart disease in infancy. Pediatrics 1999;103:743-7.
4. Malkin JD, Garber S, Broder MS, et al. Infant mortality and early postpartum discharge. Obstetr Gynecol 2000;96:183-8.
5. Meberg A, Otterstad JE, Froland G, et al. Early clinical screening for congenital heart disease: the cases we miss. Cardiol Young 1999;9:169-74.
6. Bove EL, Bull C, Stark J, et al. Congenital heart disease in the neonate: results of surgical treatment. Arch Dis Child 1983;58:137-41.
7. Hall DMB, Elliman D. Health for all children, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
8. Wren C, Richmond S, Donaldson L. Presentation of congenital heart disease in pregnancy: Implications for routine examination. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1999;80:F49-F53.
9. Salwyer JW. Neonatal and pediatric pulse oximetry. Respir Care 2003;48:386-96.
10. Arlettaz R, Bauschatz A, Monkhoff M, et al. The contribution of pulse oximetry to the early detection of congenital heart disease in newborns. Eur J Pediatr 2006;165:94-8.
11. Bakr AF, Habib HS. Combining pulse oximetry and clinical examination in screening for congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 2005;26:832-5.
12. de Wahl Granelli A, Mellander M, Sunnegardh J, et al. Screening for duct-dependant congenital heart disease with pulse oximetry: a critical evaluation of strategies to maximize sensitivity. Acta Paediatr 2005;94:1590-6.
13. Hoke TR, Donohue PK, Bawa PK, et al. Oxygen saturation as a screening test for critical congenital heart disease: a preliminary study. Pediatr Cardiol 2002;23:403-9.
14. Koppel R, I, Druschel C, Carter T, et al. Effectiveness of pulse oximetry screening for congenital heart disease in asymptomatic newborns. Pediatrics 2003;111:451-5.
15. Reich J, Miller S, Brogdon B, et al. The use of pulse oximetry to detect congenital heart disease. J Pediatr 2003;142:268-72.
16. Richmond S, Reay G, Abu H. Routine pulse oximetry in the asymptomatic newborn. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2002;87:F83-F8.
17. Rosati E, Chitano G, Dipaola L, et al. Indications and limitations for a neonatal pulse oximetry screening of critical congenital heart disease. J Perinat Med 2005;33:455-7.
18. Irwig LM, Tosteton AN, Gatsonis CA, et al. Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:667-76.
19. The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Methods Working Group on Systematic Reviews of Screening and Diagnostic Tests: Recommended Methods. 6 June, 1996. http://www.cochrane.org/newslett (accessed 24 March 2007).
20. Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. BMJ 2001;323:157- 62.
21. Khan KS, Dinnes J, Kleijnen J. Systematic reviews to evaluate diagnostic tests. J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2001;95:6-11.
22. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, et al. Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999;282:1061-6.
23. Rennie D. Improving reports of diagnostic tests: the STARD initiave. JAMA 2003;289:89-90.
24. Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, et al. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:982-90.
25. Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A, et al. Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006;6:31.
26. Sackett DL, Hayes RB, Guyatt GH, et al. Clinical epidemiology: a basic science for clinical medicine, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 1991.