pERCePtions on ERCP utilization in the United States

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 102, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 976-977

  Simmons, Dia T ^a   Baron, Todd H ^a,b  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b Charlton 8A ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BILIARY TRACT DISEASE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ETHNICITY; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HUMAN; IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; OUTPATIENT; PANCREAS DISEASE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; ULTRASOUND; UNITED STATES;

AGE FACTORS; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SEX FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34247882543     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01121.x     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Baron TH, Fleischer DE. Past, present, and future of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Perspectives on the National Institutes of Health consensus conference. Mayo Clin Proc 2002 77 : 407 12.
2. Cotton PB. Cannulation of the papilla of Vater by endoscopy and retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Gut 1972 13 : 1014 25.
3. Jamal MM, Yoon EJ, Saadi A, et al. Trends in the utilization of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol 2007 102 : 966 75.
4. Hawasli A, Lloyd L, Cacucci B. Management of choledocholithiasis in the era of laparoscopic surgery. Am Surg 2000 66 : 425 30.
5. Hobbs MS, Mai Q, Knuiman MW, et al. Surgeon experience and trends in intraoperative complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2006 93 : 844 53.
6. Regueiro CR. Will screening colonoscopy disappear and transform gastroenterology practice? Threats to clinical practice and recommendations to reduce their impact: Report of a consensus conference conducted by the AGA Institute Future Trends Committee. Gastroenterology 2006 131 : 1287 312.
7. Freeman ML. Adverse outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: Avoidance and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2003 13 : 775 98, xi.
8. Sahel J, Barthet M, Gasmi M. The substitution of endoscopic ultrasonography for endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography: Implications for service development and training. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004 16 : 291 4.
9. Jenkins JT, Glass G, Ballantyne S, et al. Effect of MRCP introduction on ERCP practice: Are there implications for service and training? Gut 2006 55 : 1365 6.
10. Baillie J. ERCP training: For the few, not for all. Gut 1999 45 : 9 10.
11. Nathan T, Kjeldsen J, Schaffalitzky de Muckadell OB. Prediction of therapy in primary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 2004 36 : 527 34.
12. Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JL, et al. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2001 96 : 2900 4.