Robust semiparametric mixing for detecting differentially expressed genes in microarray experiments

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 51, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 5253-5265

  Alfò, Marco ^a   Farcomeni, Alessio ^a   Tardella, Luca ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Counting distribution; False discovery rate; Microarray data; Mixture models; Up regulated genes

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; BINARY MIXTURES; BIOFILTERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA STRUCTURES; MICROARRAYS;

COUNTING DISTRIBUTION; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; MICROARRAY DATA; MIXTURE MODELS; UP-REGULATED GENES;

GENE EXPRESSION;

EID: 34247874596     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2006.08.009     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alon U., Barkai N., Notterman D., Gish K., Ybarra S., Mack D., and Levine A. Broad patterns of gene expression revealed by clustering analysis of tumor and normal colon tissue probed by oligonucleotide arrays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) 6745-6750
2. Amaratunga D., and Cabrera J. Exploration and Analysis of DNA Microarray and Protein Array Data (2004), Wiley, New York
3. Benjamini Y., and Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 57 (1995) 289-300
4. Boulesteix A.-L., and Tutz G. Identification of interaction patterns and classification with applications to microarray data. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 50 3 (2006) 783-802
5. Cover T., and Hart P. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory IT-13 (1967) 21-27
6. DeCook R., Nettleton D., Foster C., and Wurtele E.S. Identifying differentially expressed genes in unreplicated multiple-treatment microarray timecourse experiments. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 50 2 (2006) 518-532
7. Dette H., and Studden W. The Theory of Canonical Moments with Applications to Statistics, Probability and Analysis (1997), Wiley, New York
8. Dudoit S., Shaffer P., and Boldrick J. Multiple hypothesis testing in microarray experiments. Statist. Sci. 18 (2003) 71-103
9. Genovese C., and Wasserman L. Operating characteristics and extensions of the FDR procedure. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 64 (2002) 499-518
10. George E.O., and Bowman D. A full likelihood procedure for analysing exchangeable binary data. Biometrics 51 (1995) 512-523
11. Gieseg, M., Cody, T., Man, M., Madore, S., Rubin, M., Kaldjian, E., 2002. Expression profiling of humal renal carcinomas with functional taxonomic analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 3.
12. Gilks W.R., and Wild P. Adaptive rejection sampling for Gibbs sampling. Appl. Statist. 41 (1992) 337-348
13. Gilks W.R.e., Richardson S.e., and Spiegelhalter D.J.e. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice (1998), Chapman & Hall, London
14. Golub T., Slonim D., Tamayo P., Huard C., Gaasenbeek M., Mesirov H., Coller J.P., Loh M., Downing J., Caligiuri M., Bloomfied C.D., and Lander E. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 286 (1999) 531-537
15. Gusnanto, A., Ploner, A., Pawitan, Y., 2005. Fold-change estimation of differentially expressed genes using mixture mixed-model. Statist. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 4(1), Art. 26.
16. Hochberg Y., and Tamhane A. Multiple Comparisons Procedures (1987), Wiley, New York
17. Huang S., and Qu Y. The loss in power when the test of differential expression is performed under a wrong scale. J. Comput. Biol. 13 3 (2006) 786-797
18. Kerr M., and Churchill G. Experimental design for gene expression microarrays. Biostatistics 2 (2001) 183-202
19. Landgrebe J., Bretz F., and Brunner E. Efficient design and analysis of two colour factorial microarray experiments. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 50 2 (2006) 499-517
20. Lee M.-L.T., Whitmore G.A., Björkbacka H., and Freeman M.W. Nonparametric methods for microarray data based on exchangeability and borrowed power. J. Biopharm. Statist. 15 5 (2005) 783-797
21. Parmigiani G., Garret E., Irizarry R., and Zeger S. The Analysis of Gene Expression Data: Methods and Software (2003), Springer, Berlin
22. Pollard, K., van der Laan, M., 2003. A method to identify significant clusters in gene expression data. Technical Report 107, Division of Biostatistics, UC Berkeley.
23. Sabatti C., Karsten S., and Geschwind D. Thresholding rules for recovering a sparse signal from microarray experiments. Math. Biosci. 176 (2002) 17-34
24. Schena M. Microarray Biochip Technology (2000), Eaton
25. Skubitz K., Zimmerman W., Kammerer R., Pambuccian S., and Skubitz A. Differential gene expression identifies subgroups of renal cell carcinoma. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 147 5 (2006) 250-267
26. Steibel, J.P., Rosa, G.J.M., 2005. On reference designs for microarray experiments. Statist. Appl. Genet. Mol. Biol. 4, Art. 36, 21pp (electronic).
27. Storey J., Taylor J., and Siegmund D. Strong control, conservative point estimation and simultaneous conservative consistency of false discovery rates: a unified approach. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 66 (2004) 187-205
28. Tardella L. A new Bayesian method for nonparametric capture-recapture models in presence of heterogeneity. Biometrika 89 4 (2002) 807-817
29. Tusher V., Tibshirani R., and Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98 (2001) 5116-5121
30. Wolfinger R., Gibson G., Wolfinger E., Bennett L., Hamadeh H., Bushel P., Afshari C., and Paules R. Assessing gene significance from cDNA microarray expression data via mixed models. J. Comput. Biol. 8 (2001) 625-637