Bilateral skeletonized internal mammary versus single-pedicled internal mammary grafting in the elderly

Israel Medical Association Journal

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 294-298

  Sahar, Gideon ^a,b   Meir, Avraham ^a,b   Battler, Alexander ^a,b   Shapira, Yaron ^a,b   Vidne, Bernardo A ^a,b   Ben Dor, Itsik ^a,b  

^a RABIN MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Bilateral internal mammary arteries; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Elderly

Indexed keywords

AGED; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DEMOGRAPHY; ELDERLY CARE; ERYTHROCYTE CONCENTRATE; ERYTHROCYTE TRANSFUSION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REOPERATION; REVIEW; SAPHENOUS VEIN GRAFT; SURGICAL MORTALITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CORONARY DISEASE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INTERNAL MAMMARY-CORONARY ARTERY ANASTOMOSIS; MALE; MAMMARY ARTERIES; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RISK FACTORS; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VENTRICULAR FUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 34247855918     PISSN: 15651088     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Barner HB, Swartz MT, Mudd JG, Tyras DH. Late patency of the internal mammary artery as a coronary bypass conduit. Ann Thorac Surg 1982;34:408-12.
2. Cameron A, Kemp HG Jr, Green GE. Bypass surgery with the internal mammary artery graft: 15 year follow-up. Circulation 1986;74: 11130-6.
3. Barner HB, Standeven JW, Reese J. Twelve-year experience with internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985;90:668-75.
4. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med 1986;314:1-6.
5. Cameron A, Davis KB, Green G, Schaff HV. Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts - effects on survival over a 15-year period. N Engl J Med 1996;334:216-19.
6. Yusuf S, Zucker D, Peduzzi P, et al. Effect of coronary artery bypass graft surgery on survival: overview of 10-year results from randomised trials by the Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Trialists Collaboration. Lancet 1994;344:563-70.
7. Fiore AC, Naunheim KS, Dean P, et al. Results of internal thoracic artery grafting over 15 years: single versus double grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:202-8.
8. Kouchoukos NT, Wareing TH, Murphy SF, Pelate C, Marshall WG Jr. Risks of bilateral internal mammary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1990;49:210-17.
9. Sauvage LR, Wu HD, Kowalsky TE, et al. Healing basis and surgical techniques for complete revascularization of the left ventricle using only the internal mammary arteries. Ann Thorac Surg 1986; 42:449-65.
10. Choi JB, Lee SY. Skeletonized and pedicled internal thoracic artery grafts: effect on free flow during bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:909-13.
11. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Loop FD, et al. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999; 117:855-72.
12. Endo M, Nishida H, Tomizawa Y, Kasanuki H. Benefit of bilateral over single internal mammary artery grafts for multiple coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation 2001;104:2164-70.
13. Calafiore AM, Di Giammarco G, Teodori G, et al. Late results of first myocardial revascularization in multiple vessel disease: single versus bilateral internal mammary artery with or without saphenous vein grafts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004;26:542-8.
14. Bonacchi M, Battaglia F, Prifti E, et al. Early and late outcome of skeletonised bilateral internal mammary arteries anastomosed to the left coronary system. Heart 2005;91:195-202.
15. Taggart DP, D'Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet 2001;358:870-5.
16. Morris RI, Strong MD, Grunewald KE, et al. Internal thoracic artery for coronary artery grafting in octogenarians. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:16-22.
17. He GW, Acuff TE, Ryan WH, Mack MJ. Risk factors for operative mortality in elderly patients undergoing internal mammary artery grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:1453-60.
18. Galbut DL, Traad EA, Dorman MJ, et al. Coronary bypass grafting in the elderly. Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;106:128-35.
19. Kramer A, Mastsa M, Paz Y, Locker C, et al. Bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafting in 303 patients seventy years and older. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:290-7.
20. Loop ED. Coronary artery surgery: the end of the beginning. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1998;14:554-71.
21. Endo M, Tomizawa Y, Nishida H. Bilateral versus unilateral internal mammary revascularization in patients with diabetes. Circulation 2003;108:1343-9.
22. Gansera B, Gunzinger R, Angelis I, et al. End of the millennium - end of the single thoracic artery graft? Two thoracic arteries - standard for the next millenium? Early clinical results and analysis of risk factors in 1,487 patients with bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;49:10-15.
23. Chelemer SB, Prato BS, Cox PM Jr, O'Connor GT, Morton JR. Association of bacterial infection and red blood cell transfusion after coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:138-42.
24. Vamvakas EC, Carven JH. RBC transfusion and postoperative length of stay in the hospital or the intensive care unit among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the effects of confounding factors. Transfusion 2000;40:832-9.