|
Volumn 356, Issue 18, 2007, Pages 1889-1892
|
Religion, conscience, and controversial clinical practices [12]
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION;
HUMAN;
LETTER;
PATIENT CARE;
PATIENT RIGHT;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RELIGION;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
TREATMENT PLANNING;
CONSCIENCE;
ETHICS;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
NOTE;
PATIENT ABANDONMENT;
PHYSICIAN;
PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;
MEDICAL SOCIETY;
POLICY;
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;
STANDARD;
UNITED STATES;
POLAND;
MORALITY;
PATERNALISM;
PATIENT REFERRAL;
ADOLESCENT;
CHILE;
FEMALE;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SPINAL CORD INJURY;
CONSCIENCE;
ETHICS, MEDICAL;
HUMANS;
PHYSICIAN'S ROLE;
PHYSICIANS;
REFUSAL TO TREAT;
RELIGION AND MEDICINE;
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION;
ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY;
PATIENT RIGHTS;
UNITED STATES;
CATHOLICISM;
POLAND;
MORALS;
PATERNALISM;
REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION;
ADOLESCENT;
CHILE;
CONTRACEPTIVES, POSTCOITAL;
FEMALE;
PERSONAL AUTONOMY;
RIGHT TO DIE;
SPINAL CORD INJURIES;
POSTCOITUS CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT;
|
EID: 34247855115
PISSN: 00284793
EISSN: 15334406
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc070628 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (8)
|
References (2)
|