The development of practice theory in adult protection intervention: insights from a recent research project

The Journal of Adult Protection

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 32-45

  Douglass, Harry ^a  

^a SOUTHERN HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Interventions; Practice theory; Procedure initiated crisis; Research; Sensitive authority; Service user perceptions

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247852213     PISSN: 14668203     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14668203200500005     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Bennett G & Kingston P (1993) Elder Abuse: Concepts, Theories and Interventions. London: Chapman and Hall.
2. Breckman R & Adelman R (1992) Strategies for helping victims of elder abuse. In: S Biggs S & C Phillipson. Understanding Elder Abuse. London: Longman.
3. Cooper A, Hetherington R, Baiston K et al (1995) Positive Child Protection: A View from Abroad. Dorset: Russell House Publishing Ltd.
4. Cresswell JW (1998) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. London: Sage.
5. Denscombe M (1998) The Good Research Guide. Buckingham: Open University.
6. Department of Health (2000) No Secrets: The Protection of Vulnerable Adults - Guidance on the Development and Implementation of Multi-Agency Policies and Procedures. London: DH.
7. Department of Health and Social Services (1972) Health and Personal Social Services Order. Belfast: DHSS.
8. Department of Health and Social Services (1995) Guidance on Abuse of Vulnerable Adults. Belfast: Management Executive, DHSS.
9. Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety (2003) Co-operating to Safeguard Children. Belfast: DHSSPS.
10. Douglas H & Halliday B (2000) Reviewing practice and procedures in adult protection in the Southern Health and Social Services Board. Journal of Adult Protection 2 (2) 41-46.
11. Gibson M (1998) Order from Chaos. Birmingham: Venture Press, British Association of Social Workers.
12. Harbinson J & Morrow M (1998) Re-examining the social construction of ‘elder abuse and neglect’: a Canadian perspective. Ageing and Society. 18 691-711.
13. Hetherington R, Cooper A, Smith P et al (1997) Protecting Children: Messages from Europe. Dorset: Russell House Publishing.
14. Linnet M (2000) Chronicling care and registering concern: the use of an at-risk register for vulnerable adults. Journal of Adult Protection 2 (4) 33-35.
15. Manthorpe J & Jones P (2002) Adult protection case conferences: the chair's role. Journal of Adult Protection 4 (4).
16. McAllister A, Bailey A & Barr O (2002) Training in the joint investigation of crimes against people with learning disabilities in Northern Ireland. Journal of Adult Protection 4 (2).
17. Ogg J & Munn-Giddings C (1999) The application of therapeutic intervention in adult protection. Journal of Adult Protection 1 (2) 26-37.
18. Preston-Shoot M and Wigley V (2002) Closing the circle: social workers’ responses to multi-agency procedures on older age abuse. British Journal of Social Work 32 299-320.
19. Quigley L (1999) Why is working together so difficult? Developing policy into practice in the field of adult protection. Journal of Adult Protection 1 (2) 38-43.
20. Shawcross C (1999) Tackling elder abuse together: developing joint policies and procedures in elder abuse. In: P Slater and M Eastman (Eds) Critical Issues in Policy and Practice. London: Age Concern.
21. Skinner J (2000) Coping with Survivors and Surviving. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
22. Southern Health and Social Services Board (2000) Policy and Procedures on the Protection of Vulnerable Adults from Abuse. Armagh: SHSSB.
23. Vickers R & Lucas A (2004) Case Review in Respect of MP. Sheffield: Sheffield City Council.
24. Warburton R & Challis D (1996) Good practice identified by research: users’ needs and circumstances. Care Plan 2 (3) 32-34.
25. Westcott H (1998) Disabled children and child protection. In: C Robinson & K Stalker (Eds) Growing up with Disability. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
26. Whitfield K & Harwood L (1999) Good enough partnership? Parents’ experience of child protection investigations. Practice 11 (2) 49-58.