Sonographic hematoma-guided vs wire-localized lumpectomy for breast cancer: A comparison of margins and volume of resection

Archives of Surgery

Volumn 142, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 343-346

  Layeequr Rahman, Rakhshanda ^a   Iuanow, Elaine ^a   Crawford, Sybil ^a   Quinlan, Robert ^a  

^a UMass Memorial Health Care ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; GUIDE WIRE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LYMPH NODE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SONOGRAPHIC HEMATOMA GUIDED LUMPECTOMY; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TUMOR VOLUME; WIRE LOCALIZED LUMPECTOMY; BIOPSY; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER STAGING; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMATOMA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEMATOMA; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 34247850906     PISSN: 00040010     EISSN: 15383644     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.142.4.343     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Acosta JA, Greenlee JA. Surgical margins after needle localization breast biopsy. Am J Surg. 1995;170:643-645.
2. Kaufman CS, Delbecq R, Jacobson L. Excising the reexcision: stereotactic core biopsy decreases the need for reexcision of breast cancer. World J Surg. 1998;22:1023-1028.
3. Cangiarella J, Groos J, Symmans WF, et al. The incidence of positive margins with breast conserving therapy following mammotome biopsy for microcalcification. J Surg Oncol. 2000;74:263-266.
4. Rissanen TJ, Makarainen HP, Mattila SI, et al. Wire localized biopsy of breast lesions: a review of 425 cases found in screening or clinical mammography. Clin Radiol. 1993;47:14-22.
5. Helvie MA, Ikeda DM, Adler DD. Localization and needle aspiration of breast lesions: complications in 370 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;157:711-714.
6. Homer MJ. Transection of the localization hooked wire during breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983;141:929-930.
7. Bristol JB, Jones PA. Transgression of localizing wire into the pleural cavity prior to mammography. Br J Radiol. 1981;54:139-140.
8. Davis PS, Wexhsler RJ, Feig SA, et al. Migration of breast biopsy localization wire. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;150:787-788.
9. Snider HC Jr, Morrison DG. Intraoperative ultrasound localization of nonpalpable breast lesions. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6:308-314.
10. Rahusen FD, Taets van Amerongen AH, van Diest PJ, Borgstein PJ , Bleichrodt RP, Meijer S. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer: a feasibility study looking at the accuracy of obtained margins. J Surg Oncol. 1999;72:72-76.
11. Harlow SP, Krag DN, Ames SE, Weaver DL. Intraoperative ultrasound localization to guide surgical excision of nonpalpable breast carcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;189:241-246.
12. Rahusen FD, Bremers AJ, Fabry HF, van Amerongen AH, Boom RP, Meijer S. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancer vs wire-guided resection: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:994-998.
13. Smith LF, Henry-Tillman R, Rubio IT, Korourian S, Klimberg VS. Intraoperative localization after stereotactic biopsy without a needle. Am J Surg. 2001;182:584-589.
14. Kass R, Klimberg VS, Kass L, et al. Clip migration in stereotactic biopsy. Am J Surg. 2002;184:325-331.
15. Esserman LE, Cura MA, DaCosta D. Recognizing pitfalls in early and late migration of clip markers after image-guided directional vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiographics. 2004;24:147-156.
16. Nurko J, Mancino AT, Whitacre E, Edwards MJ. Surgical benefits conveyed by biopsy site marking system using ultrasound localization. Am J Surg. 2005;190:618-622.
17. Audisio RA, Nadeem R, Thind R, Harris O, Desmond S, Chagla LS. Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) for non-palpable breast lesions: the localization method of choice is now available in UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87:92-95.
18. Taylor ME, Perez CA, Halverson KJ, et al. Factors influencing cosmetic results after conservation therapy for breast cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31:753-764.
19. Fine RE, Staren ED. Updates in breast ultrasound. Surg Clin North Am. 2004;84:1001-1034.
20. Paganelli G, Veronesi U. Innovation in early breast cancer surgery: radio-guided occult lesion localization and sentinel node biopsy. Nucl Med Commun. 2002;23:625-627.
21. Paganelli G, Luini A, Veronesi U. Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) in breast cancer: maximizing efficacy, minimizing mutilation. Ann Oncol. 2002;13:1839-1840.
22. Gray RJ, Pockaj BA, Karstaedt PJ, Roarke MC. Radioactive seed localization of nonpalpable breast lesions is better than wire localization. Am J Surg. 2004;188:377-380.
23. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Ionizing radiation. In: Toxic and Hazardous Substances. Washington, DC: Occupational Safety & Health Administration; 1998:1-9.
24. De Kanter AY, Arends PPAM, Eggermont AMM, et al. Radiation protection for the sentinel node procedure in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003;29:396-399.