Assessment in Youth Justice: Professional Discretion and the Use of Asset

Youth Justice

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 106-122

  Baker, Kerry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247676456     PISSN: 14732254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/147322540500500204     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Andrews, D.A. and Bonta, J. (1995) The Level of Service Inventory-Revised Manual. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems Inc.
2. Aye-Maung, N. and Hammond, J. (2000) Risk of Re-Offending and Needs Assessments: The User's Perspective. Home Office Research Study 216. London, Home Office.
3. Baker, K. (2004) Is Asset Really an Asset? Risk Assessment of Young Offenders, in Burnett, R. and Roberts, C. (Eds.) What Works in Probation and Youth Justice: Developing Evidence-Based Practice. Cullompton, Willan.
4. Baker, K., Jones, S., Roberts, C. and Merrington, S. (2002) Validity and Reliability of Asset. London, Youth Justice Board.
5. Bell, M. (1998/99) The Looking After Children Materials: A Critical Analysis of Their Use in Practice. Adoption and Fostering. 22: 4, 15-24.
6. Bhui, H.S. (2001) New Probation: Closer to the End of Social Work ? British Journal of Social Work. 31: 4, 637-639.
7. Buchanan, R., Whitlow, K. and Austin, J. (1986) National Evaluation of Objective Prison Classification Systems. Crime and Delinquency, 32: 3, 272-290.
8. Burnett, R. (1996) Fitting Supervision to Offenders: Assessment and Allocation Decisions in the Probation Service. London, Home Office.
9. Burnett, R. and Appleton, C. (2004) Joined-up Youth Justice: Tackling Youth Crime in Partnership. Lyme Regis, Russell House Publishing.
10. Carson, D. (1994) Dangerous People: Through a Broader Conception of ‘Risk’ and ‘Danger’ to Better Decisions. Expert Evidence. 3: 2, 51-69.
11. Copas, J. and Marshall, P. (1998) The Offender Group Reconviction Scale: A Statistical Reconviction Score for use by Probation Officers. Applied Statistics. 47: 1, 159-171.
12. Department of Health, Department for Education and Employment and Home Office (2000) Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Their Families. London, The Stationery Office.
13. Department for Education and Skills (2005) Every Child Matters: Change for Children in the Criminal Justice System. London, Department for Education and Skills (available at http://www.everychildmatters.gov.uk/youth-justice/)
14. Eadie, T. and Canton, R. (2002) Practising in a Context of Ambivalence: The Challenge for Youth Justice Workers. Youth Justice. 2: 1, 14-26.
15. Ericson, R. and Haggerty, K. (1997) Policing the Risk Society. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.
16. Evans, T. and Harris, J. (2004) Street-Level Bureaucracy, Social Work and the (Exaggerated) Death of Discretion. British Journal of Social Work. 34: 6, 871-895.
17. Farrington, D.P. and Tarling, R. (1985) Criminological Prediction: An Introduction, in Farrington, D. and Tarling, R. Prediction in Criminology. Albany, State University of New York Press.
18. Farrow, K. (2004) Still Committed After All These Years? Morale in the Modern Day Probation Service. Probation Journal. 51: 3, 206-220.
19. Feeley, M. and Simon, J. (1992) The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and its Implications. Criminology. 30: 4, 449-474.
20. Feeley, M. and Simon, J. (1994) Actuarial Justice: The Emerging New Criminal Law, in Nelken, D. The Futures of Criminology. London, Sage.
21. Garrett, P.M. (2002) Yes Minister: Reviewing the ‘Looking After Children’ Experience and Identifying the Messages for Social Work Research. British Journal of Social Work, 32: 7, 831-846.
22. Garrett, P.M. (2003) Swimming with Dolphins: The Assessment Framework, New Labour and New Tools for Social Work with Children and Families. British Journal of Social Work. 33: 4, 441-463.
23. Gottfredson, M.R. and Gottfredson, D.M. (1988) Decision Making in Criminal Justice: Toward the Rational Exercise of Discretion. New York, Plenum.
24. Gottfredson, S.D. and Gottfredson, D.M. (1986) Accuracy of Prediction Models, in Blumstein, A., et al. (Eds.) Criminal Careers and Career Criminals. Washington DC, National Academy of Sciences.
25. Hannah-Moffat, K. and Shaw, M. (2001) Taking Risks: Incorporating Gender and Culture into the Classification and Assessment of Federally Sentenced Women in Canada. Ontario, Status of Women Canada.
26. Hoge, R. (2002) Standardized Instruments for Assessing Risk and Need in Youthful Offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 29: 4, 380-396.
27. Home Office (1992) National Standards for the Supervision of Offenders in the Community. London, Home Office.
28. Home Office (1995) National Standards for the Supervision of Offenders in the Community. London, Home Office.
29. Home Office (2000) National Standards for the Supervision of Offenders in the Community. London, Home Office.
30. Home Office/Youth Justice Board (2002) Final Warning Scheme: Guidance for the Police and Youth Offending Teams. London, Home Office.
31. Jones, P.R. (1996) Risk Prediction in Criminal Justice, in Harland, A. Choosing Correctional Options That Work: Defining the Demand and Evaluating the Supply. Thousand Oaks, California, Sage.
32. Kemshall, H. (1996) Reviewing Risk: A Review of Research on the Assessment and Management of Risk and Dangerousness: Implications for Policy and Practice in the Probation Service. Croydon (England), Home Office.
33. Kemshall, H., Parton, N., Walsh, M. and Waterson, J. (1997) Concepts of Risk in Relation to Organizational Structure and Functioning within the Personal Social Services and Probation. Social Policy and Administration. 31: 3, 213-232.
34. Lymbery, M. (2001) Social Work at the Crossroads. British Journal of Social Work. 31: 3, 369-384.
35. Mair, G. (1989) Risk Prediction and Probation: Papers from a Research and Planning Unit Workshop. London, Home Office.
36. May, T. and Buck, M. (1998) Power, Professionalism and Organisational Transformation. Sociological Research Online. 3: 2.
37. McMahon, M. (1999) Summary (Workshop on Gender, Diversity and Classification in Federally Sentenced Women's Facilities). Toronto, Status of Women Canada.
38. Merrington, S. (2004) Assessment Tools in Probation: Their Development and Potential, in Burnett, R. and Roberts, C. What Works in Probation and Youth Justice: Developing Evidence-Based Practice. Cullompton, Willan.
39. Merrington, S., Baker, K. and Wilkinson, B. Using Risk and Need Assessment Tools in Probation and Youth Justice. VISTA. 8: 1, 31-38.
40. Monture-Agnes, P. (1999) Women and Risk: Aboriginal Women, Colonialism and Correctional Practice - Some Preliminary Comments. Workshop on Gender, Diversity and Classification in Federally Sentenced Women's Facilities. Toronto, Status of Women Canada.
41. PA Consulting (2003) Delivery Plan for 100% Completion of Asset in All Required Cases. London (Unpublished).
42. Pitts, J. (2001) Korrectional Karaoke: New Labour and the Zombification of Youth Justice. Youth Justice. 1: 2, 3-16.
43. Roberts, C. (1995) Effective Practice and Service Delivery, in McGuire, J. What Works: Reducing Reoffending. Chichester, Wiley.
44. Roberts, C., Burnett, R., Kirby, A. and Hamill, H. (1996) A System for Evaluating Probation Practice: Report of a Method Devised and Piloted by the Oxford Probation Studies Unit and Warwickshire Probation Service. Oxford, University of Oxford Centre for Criminological Research.
45. Roberts, C., Baker, K., Jones, S. and Merrington, S., et al. (2001) Validity and Reliability of ASSET - Interim Report to the Youth Justice Board. Oxford, University of Oxford Centre for Criminological Research.
46. Robinson, G. (1999) Risk Management and Rehabilitation in the Probation Service: Collision and Collusion. The Howard Journal. 38: 4, 421-433.
47. Robinson, G. (2003a) Technicality and Indeterminacy in Probation Practice: A Case Study. British Journal of Social Work. 33: 5, 593-610.
48. Robinson, G. (2003b) Implementing OASys: Lessons from Research into LSI-R and ACE. Probation Journal. 50: 1, 30-40.
49. Scott, W. R. (1969) Professional Employees in a Bureaucratic Structure: Social Work, in Etzioni, A. (Ed.) The Semi-Professions and Their Organization. New York, Free Press.
50. Smith, R. (2003) Youth Justice: Ideas, Policy and Practice. Cullompton, Willan.
51. Strachan, R. and Tallant, C. (1996) Improving Judgement and Appreciating Biases Within the Risk Assessment Process, in Kemshall, H. and Pritchard, J. Good Practice in Risk Assessment and Risk Management 1. London, Jessica Kingsley.
52. Thompson, J. (1996) AGM 1995 Motions. NAPO News 76.
53. Toren, N. (1969) Semi-Professionalism and Social Work: A Theoretical Perspective, in Etzioni, A. The Semi-Professions and Their Organization. New York, Free Press.
54. Townson, C. (1994) An Improved Risk-Assessment Process: Ontario Region's Community Offender Management Strategy. Forum on Corrections Research. 6: 3, 17-19.
55. Ward, H. (Ed.) (1995) Looking After Children: Research into Practice. The Second Report to the Department of Health on Assessing Outcomes in Child Care. London, HMSO.
56. Watson, D. (2002) A Critical Perspective on Quality within the Personal Social Services: Prospects and Concerns. British Journal of Social Work. 32: 7, 877-891.
57. Wright, C. (2003) ASSET: Success Proves it Essential. Youth Justice Board News. 18: 5.
58. Youth Justice Board (2000a) ASSET: Explanatory Notes. London, Youth Justice Board.
59. Youth Justice Board (2000b) National Standards for Youth Justice. London, Youth Justice Board.
60. Youth Justice Board (2002a) Building on Success: Youth Justice Board Review 2001/02. London, Youth Justice Board.
61. Youth Justice Board (2002b) Assessment, Planning Interventions and Supervision: Key Elements of Effective Practice (Source Document). London, Youth Justice Board.
62. Youth Justice Board (2003a) ASSET (Summary). London, Youth Justice Board.
63. Youth Justice Board (2003b) Key Elements of Effective Practice Quality Assurance Framework. London, Youth Justice Board.
64. Youth Justice Board (2004) National Standards for Youth Justice Services. London, Youth Justice Board.
65. Youth Justice Board (2005) Managing Risk in the Community. London, Youth Justice Board.