An educative, values-engaged approach to evaluating STEM educational programs

New Directions for Evaluation

Volumn 2006, Issue 109, 2006, Pages 53-71

  Greene, Jennifer C ^a   DeStefano, Lizanne ^a   Burgon, Holli ^a   Hall, Jori ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247674055     PISSN: 10976736     EISSN: 1534875X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ev.178     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Burgon, H., “Program Theory Literature Review.“Unpublished paper, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 2005.
2. Cronbach, L. J., Ambron, S. R., Dornbusch, S. M., Hess, R. D., Hornik, R. C., Phillips, D. C., Walker, D. F., and Weiner, S. S., Toward Reform of Program Evaluation.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.
3. Donaldson, S. I., “Theory-Driven Program Evaluation in the New Millennium.“In S. I.Donaldson andM.Scriven (eds.), Evaluating Social Programs and Problems: Visions for the New Millennium.Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, 2003.
4. Greene, J. C., “The Educative Evaluator: An Interpretation of Lee J. Cronbach’s Vision of Evaluation.“In M. C.Alkin (ed.), Evaluation Roots: Tracing Theorists’ Views and Influences.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 2004.
5. Greene, J. C., Millett, R., and Hopson, R., “Evaluation as a Democratizing Practice.“In M.Braverman, N.Constantine, andJ. K.Slater (eds.), Putting Evaluation to Work for Foundations.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2004.
6. Guba, E. G., and Lincoln, Y. S., Fourth Generation Evaluation.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1989.
7. Hood, S., “Responsive Evaluation Amistad Style: Perspectives of One African American Evaluator.“In R.Davis (ed.), Proceedings of the Stake Symposium on Educational Evaluation.Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois, 1998.
8. House, E. R., and Howe, K. R., Values in Evaluation and Social Research.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1999.
9. Kushner, S., Personalizing Evaluation.London: Sage, 2000.
10. MacDonald, B., “Evaluation and the Control of Education.“In D.Tawney (ed.), Curriculum Evaluation Today: Trends and Implications.London: Macmillan Education, 1976.
11. Mathison, S. (ed.).Encyclopedia of Evaluation.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 2005.
12. Mertens, D. M., “Inclusive Evaluation: Implications of Transformative Theory for Evaluation.“American Journal of Evaluation, 1999, 20(1), 1-14.
13. Pawson, R., and Tilley, N., Realistic Evaluation.London: Sage, 1997.
14. Rogers, P. J., Hacsi, T. A., Petrosino, A. and Huebner, T. A. (eds.).Program Theory in Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities.New Directions for Evaluation, no. 87.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
15. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., and Leviton, L. C., Foundations of Program Evaluation: Theories of Practice.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1991.
16. Stake, R. E., “Program Evaluation, Particularly Responsive Evaluation.“Keynote address presented at conference New Trends in Evaluation, Institute of Education, University of Göteborg, Sweden, 1973.In G. F.Madaus, M.Scriven, andD. L.Stufflebeam (eds.), Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation.Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1987.
17. Stake, R. E., Standards-Based and Responsive Evaluation.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 2004.
18. Thomas, V. G., and Stevens, F. I. (eds.).“Co-Constructing a Contextually Responsive Evaluation Framework.“New Directions for Evaluation, no. 101.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2004.
19. Weiss, C. H., Evaluation Research: Methods of Assessing Program Effectiveness.Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1972.
20. Weiss, C. H., Evaluation.(2nd ed.)Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1998.
21. Weiss, C. H., “Which Links in Which Theories Shall We Evaluate?“In P. J.Rogers, T. A.Hacsi, A.Petrosino, andT. A.Huebner (eds.), Program Theory in Evaluation: Challenges and Opportunities.New Directions for Evaluation, no. 87.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2000.
22. Whitmore, E. (ed.).Understanding and Practicing Participatory Evaluation.New Directions for Evaluation, no. 80.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1998.
23. Willinsky, J., “The Strategic Education Research Program and the Public Value of Research.“Educational Researcher, 2001, 30(1), 5-14.