-
2
-
-
0343431983
-
Reason, Utopia and the Dialectic of Enlightenment
-
Cf., for example, Wellmer's critique of Adorno, in R. Bernstein (ed.), Cambridge: Polity, esp. pp. 45–51
-
Cf., for example, Wellmer's critique of Adorno, ‘Reason, Utopia and the Dialectic of Enlightenment’, in R. Bernstein (ed.) Habermas and Modernity (Cambridge: Polity, 1985), pp. 35–66, esp. pp. 45–51.
-
(1985)
Habermas and Modernity
, pp. 35-66
-
-
-
3
-
-
84968796308
-
-
In consequence, Marcuse regards the concept of utopia as obsolescent, claiming that it refers to projects for social change that are considered impossible whereas ‘today … any transformation of the technical and natural environment is a possibility’, trans. J. Shapiro and S. Weber (Harmondsworth, Mx: Penguin, here
-
In consequence, Marcuse regards the concept of utopia as obsolescent, claiming that it refers to projects for social change that are considered impossible whereas ‘today … any transformation of the technical and natural environment is a possibility’. H. Marcuse, Five Lectures: Psychoanalysis, Politics, and Utopia, trans. J. Shapiro and S. Weber (Harmondsworth, Mx: Penguin, 1970), here p. 62.
-
(1970)
Five Lectures: Psychoanalysis, Politics, and Utopia
, pp. 62
-
-
Marcuse, H.1
-
4
-
-
0004015662
-
-
One of Sorel's examples of a non-rationalist imaginative construction is the ‘myth of the general strike’. See, trans. T. E. Hulme (New York: B. W. Huebsch
-
One of Sorel's examples of a non-rationalist imaginative construction is the ‘myth of the general strike’. See G. Sorel, Reflections on Violence, trans. T. E. Hulme (New York: B. W. Huebsch, 1914), pp. 22–40.
-
(1914)
Reflections on Violence
, pp. 22-40
-
-
Sorel, G.1
-
5
-
-
84998057298
-
Georges Sorel, in his Against the Current
-
Oxford: Clarendon Press
-
I. Berlin, Georges Sorel, in his Against the Current (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), pp. 331–2.
-
(1989)
, pp. 331-332
-
-
Berlin, I.1
-
6
-
-
0009430512
-
Philosophy as Stand-In and Interpreter
-
This is the kind of metaphysical thinking that Habermas criticizes in Kant. See, trans. S. Weber Nicholsen and C. Lenhardt (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
-
This is the kind of metaphysical thinking that Habermas criticizes in Kant. See J. Habermas, ‘Philosophy as Stand-In and Interpreter’, in Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, trans. S. Weber Nicholsen and C. Lenhardt (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990), pp. 1–20.
-
(1990)
Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action
, pp. 1-20
-
-
Habermas, J.1
-
7
-
-
78650053831
-
Themes in Postmetaphysical Thinking
-
Cf., trans. W. M. Hohengarten (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
-
Cf. J. Habermas, ‘Themes in Postmetaphysical Thinking’, in Postmeta-physical Thinking, trans. W. M. Hohengarten (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992), pp. 28–53.
-
(1992)
Postmeta-physical Thinking
, pp. 28-53
-
-
Habermas, J.1
-
8
-
-
0010051913
-
The New Obscurity: The Crisis of the Welfare State and the Exhaustion of Utopian Energies
-
In, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Habermas advocates a mode of utopian thinking that operates historically and formally; however, he does not spell out the details of his proposal
-
In ‘The New Obscurity: The Crisis of the Welfare State and the Exhaustion of Utopian Energies’, in The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians’ Debate (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989), Habermas advocates a mode of utopian thinking that operates historically and formally; however, he does not spell out the details of his proposal.
-
(1989)
The New Conservatism: Cultural Criticism and the Historians’ Debate
-
-
-
9
-
-
71549170592
-
-
For a brief account of the utopian content of his theory of communicative rationality, see, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
-
For a brief account of the utopian content of his theory of communicative rationality, see M. Cooke, Language and Reason: A Study of Habermas's Pragmatics (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994), pp. 38–50.
-
(1994)
Language and Reason: A Study of Habermas's Pragmatics
, pp. 38-50
-
-
Cooke, M.1
-
10
-
-
71549170592
-
-
The normative basis for this aspect of Habermas's utopian vision is unclear. See my critical remarks in
-
The normative basis for this aspect of Habermas's utopian vision is unclear. See my critical remarks in Cooke, Language and Reason, pp. 144–7.
-
Language and Reason
, pp. 144-147
-
-
Cooke1
-
11
-
-
85026466136
-
-
See, trans. T. McCarthy (Boston, MA: Beacon Press
-
See J. Habermas, The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, trans. T. McCarthy (Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1984), pp. 379–86.
-
(1984)
The Theory of Communicative Action
, vol.1
, pp. 379-386
-
-
Habermas, J.1
-
12
-
-
84997946109
-
-
Habermas focuses on the problem of justification that arises when critical social theory fails to locate emancipatory potentials within existing social reality: see his, Cf
-
Habermas focuses on the problem of justification that arises when critical social theory fails to locate emancipatory potentials within existing social reality: see his Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1, pp. 37–86. Cf.
-
Theory of Communicative Action
, vol.1
, pp. 37-86
-
-
-
14
-
-
0003427678
-
-
trans. J. Anderson (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
-
A. Honneth, Struggle for Recognition, trans. J. Anderson (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995).
-
(1995)
Struggle for Recognition
-
-
Honneth, A.1
-
16
-
-
33846167989
-
Ethics and Dialogue
-
trans. D. Midgley (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, esp. pp. 160–8
-
A. Wellmer, ‘Ethics and Dialogue’, The Persistence of Modernity, trans. D. Midgley (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991), pp. 113–231, esp. pp. 160–8;
-
(1991)
The Persistence of Modernity
, pp. 113-231
-
-
Wellmer, A.1
-
17
-
-
84897215477
-
Truth, Contingency, and Modernity
-
trans. D. Midgley (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
-
A. Wellmer, ‘Truth, Contingency, and Modernity’, in Endgames, trans. D. Midgley (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998), pp. 137–54.
-
(1998)
Endgames
, pp. 137-154
-
-
Wellmer, A.1
-
18
-
-
0003349095
-
Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences
-
ed. and trans. A. Bass (London: Routledge
-
J. Derrida, ‘Structure, Sign, and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences’, in Writing and Difference, ed. and trans. A. Bass (London: Routledge, 1978), p. 292.
-
(1978)
Writing and Difference
, pp. 292
-
-
Derrida, J.1
-
19
-
-
84997939428
-
Pragmatism Without Regulative Ideas? Report on the Symposium in Essen on June 13 and June 14 1997
-
Wellmer himself does not focus on the problem of motivation. Instead, as Micha Werner observes, his main point is one about meaning. Wellmer claims that we are unable to understand what the concept of the ideal speech situation means because we are unable to imagine it as real; he then uses this point about meaning to make the further point that regulative ideas are nonsensical: it is absurd to use a concept we cannot understand as a regulative idea. See, http://micha.h.werner.bei.t-online.de/Werner-1997c.htm
-
Wellmer himself does not focus on the problem of motivation. Instead, as Micha Werner observes, his main point is one about meaning. Wellmer claims that we are unable to understand what the concept of the ideal speech situation means because we are unable to imagine it as real; he then uses this point about meaning to make the further point that regulative ideas are nonsensical: it is absurd to use a concept we cannot understand as a regulative idea. See M. Werner, ‘Pragmatism Without Regulative Ideas? Report on the Symposium in Essen on June 13 and June 14 1997.’ http://micha.h.werner.bei.t-online.de/Werner-1997c.htm
-
-
-
Werner, M.1
-
20
-
-
84998047694
-
Truth, Contingency, and Modernity
-
Wellmer, ‘Truth, Contingency, and Modernity’;
-
-
-
Wellmer1
-
21
-
-
84909131970
-
Der Streit um die Wahrheit. Pragmatismus ohne regulative Ideen
-
in D. Boehler, M. Kettner and G. Skirbekk (eds), Auseinandersetzung mit Karl-Otto Apel, (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp
-
A. Wellmer, ‘Der Streit um die Wahrheit. Pragmatismus ohne regulative Ideen’, in D. Boehler, M. Kettner and G. Skirbekk (eds), Reflexion und Verantwortung. Auseinandersetzung mit Karl-Otto Apel (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2003);
-
(2003)
Reflexion und Verantwortung
-
-
Wellmer, A.1
-
22
-
-
84997947659
-
Gibt es eine Wahrheit jenseits der Aussagenwahrheit?
-
A. Wellmer, ‘Gibt es eine Wahrheit jenseits der Aussagenwahrheit?’
-
-
-
Wellmer, A.1
-
24
-
-
0003403418
-
-
Cf., 's critique of Wellmer in his, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
-
Cf. J. Whitebook's critique of Wellmer in his Perversion and Utopia (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995), pp. 152–64.
-
(1995)
Perversion and Utopia
, pp. 152-164
-
-
Whitebook, J.1
-
25
-
-
18744362538
-
Richard Rorty's Pragmatic Turn
-
Habermas now accepts the validity of Wellmer's criticisms of his idea of an ideal speech situation, at least with regard to his theory of truth. See, ed. M. Cooke (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, esp. pp. 365–9
-
Habermas now accepts the validity of Wellmer's criticisms of his idea of an ideal speech situation, at least with regard to his theory of truth. See J. Habermas, ‘Richard Rorty's Pragmatic Turn’, in On the Pragmatics of Communication, ed. M. Cooke (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998), pp. 343–82, esp. pp. 365–9.
-
(1998)
On the Pragmatics of Communication
, pp. 343-382
-
-
Habermas, J.1
-
26
-
-
4244039014
-
-
Several commentators draw attention to the ‘conservative shift’ in Habermas's Between Facts and Norms, trans. W. Rehg (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995). See, for example, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
-
Several commentators draw attention to the ‘conservative shift’ in Habermas's Between Facts and Norms, trans. W. Rehg (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995). See, for example, M. Beck Matuštík, Habermas: A Philosophical-Political Profile (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001);
-
(2001)
Habermas: A Philosophical-Political Profile
-
-
Matuštík, M.B.1
-
27
-
-
0007307244
-
Between Radicalism and Resignation: Democratic Theory in Habermas
-
Between Facts and Norms', in P. Dews (ed.), Oxford: Blackwell, Although they tend to focus on the loss of a radically democratic moment, their criticisms could be taken more generally to point to a loss of a utopian perspective
-
W. Scheuermann, ‘Between Radicalism and Resignation: Democratic Theory in Habermas’ Between Facts and Norms', in P. Dews (ed.) Habermas: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), pp. 153–77. Although they tend to focus on the loss of a radically democratic moment, their criticisms could be taken more generally to point to a loss of a utopian perspective.
-
(1999)
Habermas: A Critical Reader
, pp. 153-177
-
-
Scheuermann, W.1
-
28
-
-
11144341634
-
Pathologien des Sozialen: Tradition und Aktualität der Sozialphilosophie
-
For an account of the development of critical social thinking (under the label: ‘social philosophy’), see, (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer
-
For an account of the development of critical social thinking (under the label: ‘social philosophy’), see A. Honneth, ‘Pathologien des Sozialen: Tradition und Aktualität der Sozialphilosophie’, in Pathologien des Sozialen (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer, 1994), pp. 9–69.
-
(1994)
Pathologien des Sozialen
, pp. 9-69
-
-
Honneth, A.1
-
29
-
-
0003419716
-
-
This definition is quite close to the one proposed by, trans. L. Wirth and E. Shiels (London: Routledge, Mannheim defines utopian thinking as ‘a type of orientation which transcends reality and at the same time breaks the bonds of the existing order’ (p. 173). However, Mannheim's definition overemphasizes the actual transformative effect of utopian thinking (cf. his definition on p. 185)
-
This definition is quite close to the one proposed by K. Mannheim in Ideology and Utopia, trans. L. Wirth and E. Shiels (London: Routledge, 1991). Mannheim defines utopian thinking as ‘a type of orientation which transcends reality and at the same time breaks the bonds of the existing order’ (p. 173). However, Mannheim's definition overemphasizes the actual transformative effect of utopian thinking (cf. his definition on p. 185).
-
(1991)
Ideology and Utopia
-
-
Mannheim, K.1
-
30
-
-
0003975051
-
-
See, for example, his three contributions in, (eds), (London: Verso
-
See, for example, his three contributions in J. Butler, E. Laclau and S. Žižek (eds), Contingency, Hegemony, Universality (London: Verso, 2000).
-
(2000)
Contingency, Hegemony, Universality
-
-
Butler, J.1
Laclau, E.2
Žižek, S.3
-
32
-
-
0003697964
-
-
Since Laclau embraces the core ideals of modern liberal democracy, this response is also clearly problematic from the point of view of his own guiding concerns. See, 2nd edn (London: Verso
-
Since Laclau embraces the core ideals of modern liberal democracy, this response is also clearly problematic from the point of view of his own guiding concerns. See E. Laclau and C. Mouffe, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy, 2nd edn (London: Verso, 2001), p. xv.
-
(2001)
Hegemony and Socialist Strategy
, pp. xv
-
-
Laclau, E.1
Mouffe, C.2
-
33
-
-
0002500529
-
Theses on the Philosophy of History
-
The idea of redemption as a making good of past deficiency is emphasized by Walter Benjamin; see his, ed. H. Arendt (London: Fontana, Since the question of whether the idea of redemption should embrace the making good of past deficiency has no relevance for my distinction between a ‘finalist’ and ‘fallibilist’ mode of utopian thinking, I leave it open in my discussion
-
The idea of redemption as a making good of past deficiency is emphasized by Walter Benjamin; see his ‘Theses on the Philosophy of History’, in Illuminations, ed. H. Arendt (London: Fontana, 1973). Since the question of whether the idea of redemption should embrace the making good of past deficiency has no relevance for my distinction between a ‘finalist’ and ‘fallibilist’ mode of utopian thinking, I leave it open in my discussion.
-
(1973)
Illuminations
-
-
-
34
-
-
0038936350
-
-
This is evident, Two Modes of Utopian Thought, for example, in, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
-
This is evident, for example, in E. Hansot, Perfection and Progress. Two Modes of Utopian Thought (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1974).
-
(1974)
Perfection and Progress
-
-
Hansot, E.1
-
35
-
-
84971244367
-
-
The notion of a regulative idea is, of course, most famously associated with Immanuel Kant. See, 2nd edn, trans. N. Kemp Smith (Basingstoke, Hants: Macmillan, esp
-
The notion of a regulative idea is, of course, most famously associated with Immanuel Kant. See I. Kant, The Critique of Pure Reason, 2nd edn, trans. N. Kemp Smith (Basingstoke, Hants: Macmillan, 1929), esp. pp. 532–70.
-
(1929)
The Critique of Pure Reason
, pp. 532-570
-
-
Kant, I.1
-
36
-
-
0003403418
-
-
An example here would be J. Whitebook's explanation in terms of the benign side of infantile narcissism. Whitebook makes an interesting link between early infantile impulses and the idea of perfection. See, 261
-
An example here would be J. Whitebook's explanation in terms of the benign side of infantile narcissism. Whitebook makes an interesting link between early infantile impulses and the idea of perfection. See Whitebook, Perversion and Utopia, pp. 64, 261.
-
Perversion and Utopia
, pp. 64
-
-
Whitebook1
-
37
-
-
85013787781
-
Richard Rorty's Pragmatic Turn
-
Habermas, ‘Richard Rorty's Pragmatic Turn’, p. 364.
-
-
-
Habermas1
-
38
-
-
34248733482
-
Meaning and Truth in Habermas's Pragmatics
-
Habermas himself does not historically contextualize his ‘janus-faced’ conception of truth. I make the point that it appears to be specific to the socio-cultural contexts typical of modernity in, esp. 9–15
-
Habermas himself does not historically contextualize his ‘janus-faced’ conception of truth. I make the point that it appears to be specific to the socio-cultural contexts typical of modernity in M. Cooke, ‘Meaning and Truth in Habermas's Pragmatics’, European Journal of Philosophy 9(1) (2001): 1–23, esp. 9–15.
-
(2001)
European Journal of Philosophy
, vol.9
, Issue.1
, pp. 1-23
-
-
Cooke, M.1
-
39
-
-
0037393041
-
The Theory of Reflexive Modernization
-
See the contributions of Beck, Latour, Lash and Adam to Theory, Culture and Society (2003)
-
See the contributions of Beck, Latour, Lash and Adam to Theory, Culture and Society (2003): U. Beck, ‘The Theory of Reflexive Modernization’, Theory, Culture and Society 20(2) (2003): 1–33;
-
(2003)
Theory, Culture and Society
, vol.20
, Issue.2
, pp. 1-33
-
-
Beck, U.1
-
40
-
-
0037391332
-
Is Re-Modernization Occurring — and If so, How to Prove It?
-
B. Latour, ‘Is Re-Modernization Occurring — and If so, How to Prove It?’, Theory, Culture and Society 20(2) (2003): 35–48;
-
(2003)
Theory, Culture and Society
, vol.20
, Issue.2
, pp. 35-48
-
-
Latour, B.1
-
41
-
-
0037391460
-
Relexivity as Non-Linearity
-
S. Lash, ‘Relexivity as Non-Linearity’, Theory, Culture and Society 20(2) (2003): 49–57;
-
(2003)
Theory, Culture and Society
, vol.20
, Issue.2
, pp. 49-57
-
-
Lash, S.1
-
42
-
-
0037391511
-
Reflexive Modernization Temporalized
-
and
-
and B. Adam, ‘Reflexive Modernization Temporalized’, Theory, Culture and Society 20(2) (2003): 59–78.
-
(2003)
Theory, Culture and Society
, vol.20
, Issue.2
, pp. 59-78
-
-
Adam, B.1
-
43
-
-
0008960029
-
The Philosophy of ‘As If’
-
trans. C. K. Ogden (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
-
H. Vaihinger, The Philosophy of ‘As If’, trans. C. K. Ogden (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1924).
-
(1924)
-
-
Vaihinger, H.1
|