Probing praxis in archaeology: The last eighty years

Rethinking Marxism

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 355-372

  McGuire, Randall H ^a   O’Donovan, Maria ^a   Wurst, Louann ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Archaeology; Critique; Knowledge; Praxis

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247664984     PISSN: 08935696     EISSN: 14758059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08935690500122123     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Althusser, L. 1969. For Marx. New York: Vintage.
2. Bate, F. 1998. El Proceso de Investigación en Arqueología. Barcelona: Crítica.
3. Bender, B. 1998. Stonehenge: Making space. Oxford: Berg.
4. Castro, P. V., S. Gili, V. Lull, R. Micó, C. Rihuete, R. Risch, and E. S. Yll. 1998. Towards a theory of social production and social practice. In Craft specialization: Operational sequences and beyond, vol. 4, BAR International Series 720, ed. S. Milliken and M. Vidale, 24-9. Oxford: Archaeopress.
5. Childe, V. G. 1947. History. London: Cobbett Press.
6. Childe, V. G. 1949. The sociology of knowledge. The Modern Quarterly n.s. 4: 302-9.
7. Childe, V. G. 1951. Man makes himself. New York: New American Library.
8. Childe, V. G. 1956. Society and knowledge. New York: Harperand Brothers.
9. Childe, V. G. 1979. Prehistory and Marxism. Antiquity 53: 93-5.
10. Cobb, C. 2000. From quarry to cornfield: The political economy of Mississippian hoe production. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
11. Delle, J. A. 1998. An archaeology of social space: Analyzing coffee plantations in Jamaica’s Blue Mountains. New York: Plenum.
12. Delle, J. A., S. A. Mrozowski, and R. Paynter, eds. 2000. Lines that divide: Historical archaeologies of race, class, and gender. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
13. Ensor, B. E. 2000. Social formations, modo de vida, and conflict in archaeology. American Antiquity 65: 15-42.
14. Epperson, T. W. 1985. Rubbish of rebellious riffraff: Historical and archaeological analysis of servile labor and class formation in the colonial Chesapeake. Working paper presented at the 84th annual American Anthropological Association Meetings, Washington, D.C.
15. Fritz, J. M. 1973. Relevance, archeology and subsistence theory. In Research and theory in current archeology, ed. C. L. Redman. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
16. Gandara, M. 1980. LaVieja “Nueva Arqueologia”. Boletin de Antropología Americana 2: 7-45.
17. Gandara, M. 1992. La Arqueologia Oficial Mexicana: Causas y Efectos. Mexico: Colección Divulgación del INAH.
18. Gilman, A. 1989. Marxism in American archaeology. In Archaeological thought in America, ed. C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky, 63-73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Gassiot, E., and B. Palomar. 2000. Arqueologia de la Praxis: Infórmacion Histórica de la Acción Social. Complutum 11: 87-99.
20. Gassiot, E., B. Palomar, and G. Ruiz. 1999. Brief outline of the Marxist archeology in the Spanish state. European Journal of Archaeology 2 (3): 234-6.
21. Habermas, J. 1984. The theory of communicative action. Boston: Beacon Press.
22. Handsman, R. G., and M. P. Leone. 1989. Living history and critical archaeology in the reconstruction of the past. In Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology, ed. V. Pinsky and A. Wylie, 117-35. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Hodder, I. 1999. The archaeological process: an introduction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
24. Hodder, I., ed. 2000. Towards reflexive method in archaeology: The example at Catalhöyük. Monograph No. 28. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research/British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara.
25. Johnson, M. H. 1989. Conceptions of agency in archaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8: 189-211.
26. Kohl, P. 1985. Symbolic and cognitive archaeology: A new loss of innocence. Dialectical Anthropology 9: 105-17.
27. Leone, M. 1986. Symbolic, structural, and critical archaeology. In American archaeology past and future, ed. D. Meltzer, D. Fowler and J. Sabloff, 415-38. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
28. Meltzer, D. Fowler and J. Sabloff, 1995. A historical archaeology of capitalism. American Anthropologist 97 (2): 251-68.
29. Leone, M., and B. Little. 1993. Artifacts as expressions of society and culture: Subversive genealogy and the value of history. In History from things: Essays on material culture, ed. S. Lubar and W. D. Kingery, 160-81. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
30. Leone, M. P., and P. B. Potter, Jr., eds. 1999. Historical archaeologies of capitalism. New York: Kluwer Academic.
31. Leone, M. P., P. B. Potter, Jr., and P. A. Shackel. 1987. Toward a critical archaeology, Current Anthropology 28 (3): 283-302.
32. Lorenzo, J. L., A. P. Lias, and J. García-Bárcena. 1976. Hacia una Arqueologia Social: Reunión de Teotihuacan. Mexico City: INAH.
33. The Ludlow Collective 2001. Archaeology of the Colorado Coal Field War, 1913-1914. In Archaeologies of the contemporary past, ed. V. Buchli and G. Lucas, 94-107. London: Routledge.
34. Martin, P. S., and F. Plog. 1973. The archaeology of Arizona: A study of the Southwest region. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
35. Martin, P. S., and D. A. Gregory. 1973. Prehistoric and contemporary problems. In The archaeology of Arizona: A study of the Southwest region, ed. P. S. Martin and F. Plog, 361-368. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
36. Matthews, C. N. 2002. An archaeology of history and tradition: Moments of danger in the Annapolis landscape. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
37. McGuire, R. H. 1988. Dialogues with the dead, ideology and the cemetery. In The recovery of meaning: Historical archaeology in the eastern United States, ed. M. P. Leone and P. B. Potter, Jr., 435-480. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.
38. McGuire, R. H. 1992. A Marxist archaeology. Orlando: Academic Press.
39. McGuire, R. H., and R. Navarrete. 1999. Entre Motocicletas y Fusiles: Las Arqueologías Radicales Anglosajona y Latinoamericana. Boletih de Antropologi’a Americana 34: 89 110.
40. McGuire, R. H., and P. Reckner. 2002. The unromantic West: Labor, capital, and struggle. Historical Archaeology 36 (3): 4-58.
41. McGuire, R. H., and D. J. Saitta. 1996. Although they have petty captains, they obey them badly: The dialectics of prehispanic western Pueblo social organization. American Antiquity 61: 197-216.
42. Meskel, L. 1998. Twin peaks: The archaeologies of Çatalhöyük. In Ancient goddesses: The myths and evidence, ed. C. Morris and L. Goodison, 46-62. London: British Museum Press.
43. Muller, J. 1997. Mississippian political economy. New York: Plenum.
44. Mullins, P. 1999. Race and affluence: An archaeology of African America and consumer culture. New York: Plenum.
45. O’Donovan, M. 2002. Grasping power: A question of relations and scales. In The dynamics of power, ed. M. O’Donovan, 19-34. Occasional Paper No. 30. Carbon- dale: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University.
46. Ollman, B. 1976. Alienation. 2d ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Ollman, B. 1993. Dialectical investigations. New York: Routledge.
48. Panameno, R., and E. Nalda. 1978. Arqueologia, Para Quien? Nueva Antropología 12: 111 24.
49. Patterson, T. C. 1973. America’s past: A New World archaeology. London: Scott Foresman.
50. Patterson, T. C. 1989. Political economy and a discourse called “Peruvian archaeology”. Culture and History 4: 35-64.
51. Plog, F. 1974. A study of prehistoric change. New York: Academic Press.
52. Praetzellis, A. 2000. Death by theory: A tale of mystery and archaeological theory. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
53. Redman, C. L. 1973. Research and theory in current archaeology. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
54. Saitta, D. J. 1994. Agency, class, and archaeological interpretation. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 13: 1-27.
55. Saitta, D. J. 1997. Power, labor, and the dynamics of change in Chacoan political economy. American Antiquity 62: 7-26.
56. Sanahuja, M. E. 2002. Cuerpos Sexuados, Objectos, y Prehistoria. Valencia: Ediciones Cátedra, Universitat de Valéncia.
57. Sayer, D. 1987. The violence of abstraction. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
58. Shackel, P., P. R. Mullins, and M. S. Warner, eds. 1998. Annapolis pasts: Historical archaeology in Annapolis, Maryland. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
59. Shanks, M., and C. Tilley. 1992. Reconstructing archaeology: Theory and practice, 2d ed. London: Routledge.
60. Tilley, C. 1989. Archaeology as socio-political action in the present. In Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: Essays in the philosophy, history and socio-politics of archaeology, ed. V. Pinsky and A. Wylie, 10-16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61. Trigger, B. G. 1978. Time and traditions: Essays in archaeological interpretation. New York: Columbia University Press.
62. Trigger, B. G. 1980. Gordon Childe: Revolutions in archaeology. New York: Columbia University Press.
63. Trigger, B. G. 1995. Archaeology and the integrated circus. Critique of Anthropology 15: 319 35.
64. Vázquez, J. M., and R. Risch. 1991. Theory in Spanish archaeology since 1960. In Archaeological theory in Europe: The last three decades, ed. I. Hodder, 25-51. London: Routledge.
65. Vargas, I. 1990. Arqueología, Ciencia y Sociedad. Ensayo sobre Teoría Arqueólegica y la Formación Económico Social Tribal en Venezuela. Caracas: Editorial Abrebrecha.
66. Vargas, I., and M. Sanoja. 1999. Archaeology as social science: Its expression in Latin America. In Archaeology in Latin America, ed. G. G. Politisand B. Alberti. London: Routledge.
67. Wobst, H. M. 1989. Commentary: A socio-politics of socio-politics in archaeology. In Critical traditions in contemporary archaeology: Essays in the philosophy, history and socio-politics of archaeology, ed. V. Pinsky and A. Wylie, 136-140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68. Wood, M. 2002. Women’s work and class conflict in a working-class coal-mining community. In The dynamics of power, ed. M. O’Donovan, 66-87. Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University.
69. Wurst, L. 1999a. Internalizing class in historical archaeology. In Confronting class, ed. L. Wurst and R. K. Fitts. Historical Archaeology 33 (1): 7-21.
70. Wurst, L. 1999b. Review of historical archaeologies of capitalism. Northeastern Historical Archaeology 28: 105-8.
71. Wurst, L. 2002. “For the means of yoursubsistence… look underGod toyourown industry and frugality”: Life and labor in Gerrit Smith’s Peterboro. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 6 (3): 159-72.
72. Wurst, L., and R. H. McGuire. 1999. Immaculate consumption: A critique of the “shop till you drop" school of human behavior. International Journal of Historical Archaeology 3 (3): 191-9.
73. Wylie, A. 1999. Why should historical archaeologists study capitalism? In Historical archaeologies of capitalism, ed. M. P. Leone and P. B. Potter, Jr., 23-50. New York: Plenum.