A journey to understand the role of culture in program evaluation: Snapshots and personal reflections of one African American evaluator

New Directions for Evaluation

Volumn 2004, Issue 102, 2004, Pages 21-37

  Hood, Stafford ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247664152     PISSN: 10976736     EISSN: 1534875X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ev.113     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baldwin, J., No Name in the Street.New York: Dial Press, 1972.
2. Chevalier, Z. W., Roark-Calnek, S., and Strahan, D. B., “Responsive Evaluation of an Indian Heritage Studies Program: Analyzing Boundary Definition in a Suburban School Context.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York City, Mar. 1982.
3. Cronbach, L. J., Designing Evaluations of Educational and Social Programs.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982.
4. Cronbach, L. J., and Associates.Toward Reform of Program Evaluation.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.
5. Fetterman, D. M., “Empowerment Evaluation.“Evaluation Practice, 1994, 15(1), 1-15.
6. Grace, C. A., “Practical Considerations for Program Professionals and Evaluators Working with African American Communities.“In M. A.Orlandi (ed.), Cultural Competence for Evaluators: A Guide for Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Prevention with Practitioners Working with Ethnic/Racial Communities.Rockville, Md.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1992.
7. Guba, E. G., and Lincoln, Y. S., Effective Evaluation.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981.
8. Hood, S., “Responsive Evaluation Amistad Style: Perspectives of One African American Evaluator.“In R.Sullivan (ed.), Proceedings of the Stake Symposium on Educational Evaluation.Champaign, Ill.: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1998.
9. Hood, S., “Assessment in the Context of Culture and Pedagogy: A Collaborative Effort, a Meaningful Goal.“Journal of Negro Education, 1999, 67(3), 184-186.
10. Hood, S., “Nobody Knows My Name: In Praise of African American Evaluators Who Were Responsive.“In J.Greene and T.Abma (eds.), Responsive Evaluation: Roots and Wings.New Directions for Evaluation, no. 92.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2001.
11. House, E., Educational Policy Analysis Archives. 1991.
12. House, E. R., and Howe, K. R., Values in Evaluation and Social Research.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1999.
13. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation.The Program Evaluation Standards.(2nd ed.)Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1994.
14. Kirkhart, K. E., “Seeking Multicultural Validity: A Postcard from the Road.“Evaluation Practice, 1995, 16(1), 1-12.
15. Madison, A. M. (ed.).Minority Issues in Program Evaluation.New Directions for Program Evaluation, no. 53.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1992.
16. McLaughlin, M. W., and Phillips, D. C., Evaluation: At Quarter Century.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
17. Mertens, D. M., Research Methods in Education and Psychology: Integrating Diversity with Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches.Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1997.
18. Nairobi M&E Network, and others. “The African Evaluation Guidelines 2002: A Checklist to Assist in Planning Evaluations, Negotiating Clear Contracts, Reviewing Progress, and Ensuring Adequate Completion of an Evaluation. " Evaluation and Program Planning, 2002, 25, 481-492.
19. Patton, M. Q., “Developmental Evaluation.“Evaluation Practice, 1994, 15(3), 311-320.
20. Russon, C., and Patel, M., “Appropriateness of the Program Evaluation Standards for Use in Africa.“Paper presented to the African Evaluation Association, 1998.
21. Scriven, M., “The Methodology of Evaluation.“In R.Stake (ed.), Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation.Skokie, Ill.: Rand McNally, 1967.
22. Scriven, M., “Pros and Cons About Goal-Free Evaluation.“Evaluation Comment, 1972, 3, 1-7.
23. Scriven, M., Evaluation Thesaurus.(4th ed.)Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1991.
24. Scriven, M., “The Meaning of Bias.“In R.Davis (ed.), The Proceedings of the Stake Symposium on Educational Evaluation.Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1998.
25. Stake, R. E., “The Countenance of Educational Evaluation.“Teachers College Record, Apr.1967, 68, 523-540.
26. Stake, R. E., Responsive Evaluation. 1972. (ED 075-187)
27. Stake, R. E., “Program Evaluation, Particularly Responsive Evaluation.” Paper presented at a conference on new trends in evaluation, Goteborg, Sweden, Oct. 1975.
28. Stake, R. E., “Retrospective on ‘The Countenance of Educational Evaluation’.” In M. W.McLaughlin and D. C.Phillips (eds.), Evaluation: At Quarter Century.(Ninetieth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education).Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
29. Stufflebeam, D. L., “Empowerment Evaluation, Objectivist Evaluation, and Evaluation Standards: Where the Future of Evaluation Should Not Go and Where It Needs to Go.“Evaluation Practice, 1994, 15(3), 321-338.
30. Stufflebeam, D. L., and others.Educational Evaluation and Decision Making.Itasca, Ill.: Peacock, 1971.
31. Tolson, J., Pilgrim in the Ruins.New York: Simon & Schuster, 1992.
32. Tyler, R. W., “General Statement on Program Evaluation.“In M. W.McLaughlin and D. C.Phillips (eds.), Evaluation: At Quarter Century.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
33. Wilcox, T., “Evaluating Programs for Native Students: A Responsive Strategy.” Paper presented at the Mokakit Indian Education Research Association’s International Conference, London, Ontario, Canada, July 1984.
34. Worthen, B., Sanders, J. R., and Fitzpatrick, J. L., Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines.White Plains, N.Y.: Longman, 1997.