Ectogenesis and Mother as Machine

Body & Society

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 43-59

  Aristarkhova, Irina ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247662657     PISSN: 1357034X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1357034X05056190     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Barzilai, S. (1999) Lacan and the Matter of Origins. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
2. Bodemer, C.W. (1973) ‘Historical Interpretations of the HumanUterus and Cervix Uteri’, in R.J. Blandau and K. Moghissi (eds) The Biology of the Cervix. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Campbell, D. (1953) ‘The Medical Curriculum of theUniversities of Europe in the Sixteenth Century, with Special Reference to theArabist Tradition’, in E. Underwood (ed.) Science, Medicine and History, vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Canguilhem, G. (1952/1992) ‘Machine andOrganism’, in J. Crary and S. Kwinter (eds) Incorporations, trans. M. Cohen and R. Cherry. New York: Zone Books.
5. Churchill, F.B. (1970) ‘The History of Embryology as Intellectual History’, Journal of the History of Biology 3(1): 155-181.
6. Franklin, S. (1995) ‘Postmodern Procreation: A CulturalAccount of Assisted Reproduction’, in F.D. Ginsburg and R. Rapp (eds) Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics ofReproduction. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
7. Ginsburg, F. and R. Rapp (eds) (1995) Conceiving the New World Order: The GlobalPolitics of Reproduction. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
8. Gosden, R. (2000) Designing Babies: The Brave New World of ReproductiveTechnology. New York: Freeman and Co.
9. Hacking, I. (1998) ‘Canguilhem amid the Cyborgs’, Economy and Society 27(2&3): 202-216.
10. Haraway, D. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention ofNature. New York: Routledge.
11. Héritier-Augé, F. (1989) ‘Semen and Blood: Some Ancient TheoriesConcerning their Genesis and Relationship’, in M. Feher, R. Naddaff and N. Tazi (eds) Fragments for a History of the Human Body, part 3, trans. T.Jolas. New York: Zone Books.
12. HPST (Program in History and Philosophy of Science and Technology), StanfordUniversity, URL (consulted 17 June 2005) http://www.stanford.edu/dept/HPST/ectogenesis/introduction.html
13. Kapani, L. (1989) ‘Note on theGarbha-Upanisad,’ in M. Feher, R. Naddaff and N. Tazi (eds) Fragments for a History of the Human Body, part 3, trans. A.Hustvedt. New York: Zone Books.
14. Knauft, B.M. (1989) ‘Bodily Images in Melanesia: CulturalSubstances and Natural Metaphors’, in M. Feher, R. Naddaff and N. Tazi (eds) Fragments for a History of the Human Body, part 3, trans. A.Hustvedt. New York: Zone Books.
15. Liu, H.H.C. (2001) ‘Engineering Endometrial Tissue: Interviewwith Helen Liu’, URL (consulted 17 June 2005): http://www.obgyn.net/displaytranscript.asp?page=/avtranscripts/asrm2001-liu
16. Needham, J. (1959) A History of Embryology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Newman, K. (1996) Fetal Positions: Individualism, Science,Visuality. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18. Oakley, A. (1984) The Captured Womb: A History of the Medical Care ofPregnant Women. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
19. Oliver, K. (1997) Family Values. London: Routledge.
20. Petchesky, R.P. (1995) ‘The Body as Property: A FeministRe-vision’, in F.D. Ginsburg and R. Rapp (eds) Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics ofReproduction. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
21. Plant, S. (1995) ‘The Future Looms: Weaving Women andCybernetics’, in M. Featherstone and R. Burrows (eds) Cyberspace, Cyberbodies, Cyberpunk: Cultures of TechnologicalEmbodiment. London: Sage.
22. Raymond, J.R. (1993) Women as Wombs: Reproductive Technologies and theBattle over Women's Freedom. San Francisco: HarperCollins.
23. Rowland, R. (1992) Living Laboratories: Women and ReproductiveTechnology. London: Lime Tree.
24. Sissa, G. (1989) ‘Subtle Bodies: The Body of Semen and theSeal of Virginity’, in M. Feher, R. Naddaff and N. Tazi (eds) Fragments for a History of the Human Body, part 3, trans. J.Lloyd. New York: Zone Books.
25. Slikke, H. (2001) ‘Engineering Endometrial Tissue: Interviewwith Helen Liu’, URL (consulted 17 June 2005) http://www.obgyn.net/displaytranscript.asp?page=/avtranscripts/asrm2001-liu
26. Smith-Windsor, J. (2004) ‘The Cyborg Mother: A Breached Boundary’, Ctheory 2 April, URL (consulted 6 April 2005): http://www.ctheory.net/text_file.asp?pick=409
27. Unno, N. (2000) ‘Development of an ArtificialPlacenta’, in G. Stocker and C. Shopf (eds) Next Sex: Ars Electronica 2000. New York, Vienna: Springer.
28. ‘Upanisad of the Embryo’ (1989) in M. Feher, R. Naddaff and N. Tazi (eds) Fragments for a History of the Human Body, part 3, trans. L.Kapani and A. Hustvedt. New York: Zone Books.
29. Walker, M.B. (1998) Philosophy and the Maternal Body: ReadingSilence. London: Routledge.
30. Wells, D. and P. Singer (1984) The Reproduction Revolution: New Ways of MakingBabies. New York: Oxford University Press.