The ambivalences of parental care among young German adults

Contemporary Perspectives in Family Research

Volumn 4, Issue , 2003, Pages 225-252

  Lorenz Meyer, Dagmar ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247656843     PISSN: 15303535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1530-3535(03)04010-X     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Bauman, Z. (1992). Intimations of postmodernity. London: Routledge.
2. Becker-Schmidt, R. (1980). Widersprüchliche Realität und Ambivalenz: Arbeitserfahrungen von Frauen in Beruf und Familie [Contradictory reality and ambivalence: Women’s work experiences in occupation and family]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 32, 702–725.
3. Becker-Schmidt, R. (1993). Ambivalenz und Nachträglichkeit: Perspektiven einer feministischen Biographieforschung [Ambivalence and deferred action: Perspectives for feminist biographical research]. In: M. Küger (Ed.), Was Heisst hier Eigentlich Feministisch? Zur Theoretischen Diskussion in den Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften [What is really meant by feminist? On the theoretical discussion in the humanities and social sciences] (pp. 80–92). Bremen, Germany: Donat Verlag.
4. Bleuler, E. (1910/11, July 30, August 13). Zur Theorie des schizophrenen Negativismus [On the theory of schizophrenic negativism]. Psychiatrisch-Neurologische Wochenschrift, 171–198.
5. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex.’ London: Routledge.
6. Du Bois-Remond, M., Büchner, P., & Krüger, H. (1993). Die moderne Familie als Verhandlungshaushalt: Zum Wandel des Generationenverhältnisses im interkulturellen Vergleich [The modern family as a household of negotiation: On the change of intergenerational relations in an intercultural comparison]. Neue Praxis, 27, 32–42.
7. Felman, J. L. (2001). Never a dull moment: Teaching and the art of performance. London: Routledge.
8. Finch, J., & Mason, J. (1992). Negotiating family responsibilities. London: Routledge, Tavistock.
9. Freud, S. (1916/1989a). 13.Vorlesung: Archaische Züge und Infantilismus des Traumes [Lecture 13: Archaic traces and infantilism of dreams]. In: A. Mitcherlich, A. Richards & J. Strachey (Eds), Sigmund Freud Studienausgabe, Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse und Neue Folge [Sigmund Freud study edition, Lectures on the Introduction to Psychoanalysis and New Series] (pp. 204–216). Frankfurt a. M., Germany: Fischer.
10. Freud, S. (1917/1989b). 33. Vorlesung: DieWeiblichkeit [Lecture 33: Femininity]. In: A. Mitcherlich, A. Richards & J. Strachey (Eds), Sigmund Freud Studienausgabe, Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Psychoanalyse und Neue Folge [Sigmund Freud study edition, Lectures on the Introduction to Psychoanalysis and New Series] (pp. 544–565). Frankfurt a. M., Germany: Fischer.
11. George, L. K. (1986). Caregiver burden: Conflict between norms of reciprocity and solidarity. In: K. A. Pillemer & R. S. Wolf (Eds), Elder Abuse: Conflict in the Family (pp. 67–92). Dover, MA: Auburn House.
12. Hagan, J. (2001). Cause and country: The politics of ambivalence and the American Vietnam war resistance in Canada. Social Problems, 48, 168–184.
13. Handel, W. (1979). Normative expectations and the emergence of meaning as solutions to problems: Convergence of structural and interactionist views. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 855–881.
14. Kaufmann, F.-X. (1993). Generationenbeziehungen und Generationenverhältnisse im Wohlfahrtsstaat [Intergenerational relationships and relations between generations in the welfare state]. In: K. Lüscher & F. Schultheis (Eds), Generationenbeziehungen in Postmodernen Gesellschaften: Analysen zum Verhältnis von Individuum, Familie, Staat und Gesellschaft [Intergenerational relations in postmodern societies: Analyses of the relation between individual, family, state, and society] (pp. 95–107). Konstanz, Germany: Universitätsverlag Konstanz.
15. Krüger, H., Born, C., Einemann, B., Heintze, S., & Saifi, H. (1987). Privatsache Kind – Privatsache Beruf: “Und dann hab’ ich ja noch Haushalt, Mann und Wäsche!” Zur Lebenssituation von Frauen mit kleinen Kindern in unserer Gesellschaft [Private matter child – private matter occupation: “And then I also have household, husband, and laundry!” On the lives of women with small children in our society]. Opladen, Germany: Leske & Budrich.
16. Lorenz-Meyer, D. (1999). The gendered politics of generational contracts: Changing discourses and practices of intergenerational commitments in West Germany. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The London School of Economics and Political Science, London.
17. Lorenz-Meyer, D. (2001). Zur Relationalität von Individualisierung und Verflechtung: Eine historische Betrachtung deutscher sozialer (Alters-) Sicherungssysteme [On the relation between individualization and interconnection: A historical analysis of German social security systems in old age]. In: H. Krüger & C. Born (Eds), Individualisierung und Verflechtung. Geschlecht und Generation im Deutschen Lebenslaufregime [Individualization and Interconnection. Gender and generation in the German life course regime] (pp. 233–253). Munich, Germany: JuventaVerlag.
18. Lüscher, K., Pajung-Bilger, B., Lettke, F., & Böhmer, S. (2000). Generationenambivalenzen operationalisieren: Konzeptuelle, methodische und forschungspraktische Grundlagen [Operationalizing intergenerational ambivalences: Conceptual, methodical, and practical foundations]. Arbeitspapier [Working Paper] 34.1.Universität Konstanz, Germany: Forschungsschwerpunkt “Gesellschaft und Familie.”
19. Lüscher, K., & Pillemer, K. (1998). Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 413–425.
20. McCormick, B. (2002). Against ambivalence. Retrieved March 22, 2002, from: http://www.cloud9.net∼bradmcc/ambivalence.html
21. Merton, R. K., & Barber, E. (1963). Sociological ambivalence. In: E. A. Tiryakian (Ed.), Sociological Theory, Values and Sociocultural Change: Essays in Honor of Pitirim A. Sorokin (pp. 91–120). London: Free Press of Glencoe.
22. Parker, R. (1995). Mother love, mother hate: The power of maternal ambivalence. London: Basic Books.
23. Patterson, N. T. (1997). Conflicting norms in modern British kinship: Cases of domestic violence and competition for care in North Wales 1920–1996. The History of the Family, 2(1), 1–29.
24. Qureshi, H., & Walker, A. (1989). The caring relationship: Elderly people and their families. London: Macmillan.
25. Rich, A. (1986). Notes towards a politics of location. In: A. Rich (Ed.), Blood, Bread, and Poetry (pp. 210–231). London: Virago.
26. Savage, M., Bagnall, G., & Longhurst, B. (2001). Ordinary, ambivalent and defensive: Class identities in the Northwest of England. Sociology, 35, 875–892.
27. Thompson, M. M., & Holmes, J. G. (1996). Ambivalence in close relationships: Conflicted cognitions as a catalyst for change. In: R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: The Interpersonal Context (Vol. 3, pp. 497–530). New York: Guilford Press.
28. Twigg, J., & Atkin, K. (1994). Carers perceived: Policy and practice in informal care. Buckingham: Open University Press.
29. Varga, I. (2001). To live with ambivalence, or aren’t we all barbarians? A response to Aziz Al-Azmeh. International Sociology, 16, 95–114.
30. Weigert, A. J., & Franks, D. D. (1989). Ambivalence: A touchstone of the modern temper. In: D. D. Franks & D. E. McCarthy (Eds), The Sociology of Emotions (pp. 205–207). Greenwich, CT: JAI.