Application of a distributed large basin runoff model in the Great Lakes basin

Control Engineering Practice

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1001-1011

  He, Chansheng ^a,b   Croley II, Thomas E ^c  

^a WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Chinese Academy of Sciences   (China)

^c NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Calibration; GIS interface; Great Lakes; Hydrologic modeling; Spatial variability

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA STRUCTURES; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GROUNDWATER; HYDROLOGY; WATER RESOURCES;

DISTRIBUTED LARGE BASIN RUNOFF MODEL (DLBRM); HYDROLOGIC MODELING; SPATIAL VARIABILITY;

RUNOFF;

CATCHMENTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA STRUCTURES; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GROUNDWATER; HYDROLOGY; RUNOFF; WATER RESOURCES;

EID: 34247648049     PISSN: 09670661     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2007.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Abdulla F.A., Lettenmaier D.P., Wood E.F., and Smith J.A. Application of a macroscale hydrologic model to estimate the water balance of the Arkansas-Red River Basin. Journal of Geophysical Research 101 D3 (1996) 7449-7459
2. Allen W.B., Miller J.B., and Wood W.W. Availability of water in Kalamazoo County, Southwestern Michigan. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1973 (1972), US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
3. Beasley D.B., Huggins L.F., and Monke E.J. ANSWERS: A model for watershed planning. Transactions of the ASAE 23 4 (1980) 938-944
4. Becker A., and Braun P. Disaggregation, aggregation and spatial scaling in hydrologic modeling. Journal of Hydrology 217 (1999) 239-252
5. Beven K.J. Rainfall-runoff modelling: The primer (2000), Wiley & Sons, Ltd., New York 360p
6. Bicknell B.R., Imhoff J.C., Kittle J., Donigian A.S., and Johansen R.C. Hydrological Simulation Program-FORTRAN, User's Manual for Release 11 (1996), US Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Athens, Georgia
7. Borah A., and Haan C.T. Impact of random data errors on parameter estimation in hydrologic modeling. Transactions of the ASAE 34 3 (1991) 857-864
8. Bras R.L. Hydrology: an introduction to hydrologic science (1990), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts 643p
9. Castelletti, A., de Rigo, D., Rizzoli, A. E., Soncini-Sessa, R., Weber, E. (2006). Neuro-dynamic programming for designing water reservoir network management policies. Control Engineering Practice. Corrected Proof, Available online: 〈http://www.elsevier.com/locate/conengprac〉. doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2006.02.011.
10. Chaubey I., Haan C.T., Grunwald S., and Salisbury J.M. Uncertainty in the model parameters due to spatial variability of rainfall. Journal of Hydrology 220 (1999) 48-61
11. Crawford N.H., and Linsley R.K. Digital simulation in hydrology: Stanford watershed model IV. Technical Report 39 (1966), Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, California
12. Croley II, T. E. (2002). Large basin runoff model. Mathematical Models in Watershed Hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Littleton, Colorado, pp. 717-770.
13. Croley II T.E., and He C. Distributed-parameter large basin runoff model I: Model development. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 10 3 (2005) 173-181
14. Croley II T.E., and He C. Watershed surface and subsurface spatial intraflows. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 11 1 (2006) 12-20
15. Croley II T.E., Quinn F.H., Kunkel K.E., and Changnon S.J. Great Lakes hydrology under transposed climates. Climatic Change 38 (1998) 405-433
16. Croley II T.E., He C., and Lee D.H. Distributed-parameter large basin runoff model II: application. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 10 3 (2005) 182-191
17. Danish Hydraulic Institute. (1990). MIKE11 - A microcomputer based modeling system for rivers and channels: users manual. Horsholm, Demark.
18. Duviella E., Chiron P., Charbonnaud P., and Hurand P. Supervision and hybrid control accommodation for water asset management. Control Engineering Practice 15 1 (2007) 17-27
19. Engman, E. T. (1995). Recent advances in remote sensing in hydrology. Reviews of Geophysics, (Supplement), 967-975.
20. Engman E.T., and Gurney R.J. Remote sensing in hydrology (1991), Chapman and Hall, New York
21. Freeze R.A. Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff. 2. Upstream source areas. Water Resources Research 8 5 (1972) 1272-1283
22. Gan T.Y., Dlamini E.M., and Biftu G.F. Effects of model complexity and structure, data quality, and objective functions on hydrologic modeling. Journal of Hydrology 192 (1997) 81-103
23. Garrote L., and Bras R.L. An integrated software environment for real-time use of a distributed hydrologic model. Journal of Hydrology 167 (1995) 307-326
24. Gupta H.V., Sorooshian S., and Yapo P.O. Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information. Water Resources Research 34 4 (1998) 751-763
25. Hall F.G., Huemmerich K.F., Goetz S.J., Sellers P.J., and Nickeson J.E. Satellite remote sensing of surface energy balance: Success, failures, and unresolved issues in FIFE. Journal of Geophysical Research 97 D17 (1992) 19061-19089
26. He C. Modeling hydrologic impact of withdrawing the great lakes water for agricultural irrigation. Journal of The American Water Resources Association 33 5 (1997) 1055-1068
27. He C. Integration of GIS and simulation model for watershed management. Environmental Modeling and Software 18 8-9 (2003) 809-813
28. He C., Riggs J.F., and Kang Y.T. Integration of geographic information systems and a computer model to evaluate impacts of agricultural runoff on water quality. Water Resources Bulletin 29 (1993) 891-900
29. He C., Shi C., Yang C., and Agosti B.P. A Windows-based GIS-AGNPS interface. Journal of American Water Resources Association 37 2 (2001) 395-406
30. Hellweger F.L., and Maidment D.R. Definition and connection of hydrologic elements using geographic Data. Journal of Hydro-Engineering 4 1 (1999) 1-18
31. Hobbins M.T., Ramirez J.A., Brown T.C., and Claessens L.J.J.M. The complementary relationship in estimation of regional evapotranspiration: The complementary relationship areal evapotranspiration and advection-aridity models. Water Resources Research 37 5 (2001) 1367-1387
32. Holmes K.W., Chadwick O.A., and Kyriakidis P.C. Error in a USGS 30-meter digital elevation model and its impact on terrain modeling. Journal of Hydrology 233 (2000) 154-173
33. Hornberger, G. M., & Boyer, E. W. (1995). Recent advances in watershed modeling. Review of Geophysics, Supplement, 949-957.
34. Jakeman A.J., and Hornberger G.M. How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model. Water Resources Research 29 8 (1993) 2637-2649
35. Karvonen T., Koivusalo H., Jauhiainen M., Palko J., and Weppling K. A hydrologic model for predicting runoff from different land use areas. Journal of Hydrology 217 (1999) 253-265
36. Kenward T., Lettenmaier D.P., Wood E.F., and Fielding E. Effects of digital elevation model accuracy on hydrologic predictions. Remote Sensing of Environment 74 2000 (2000) 432-444
37. Kokkonen T.S., and Jakeman A.J. A comparison of metric and conceptual approaches in rainfall-runoff modeling and its implications. Water Resources Research 37 9 (2001) 2345-2352
38. Koren V.I., Finnerty B.D., Schaake J.C., Smith M.B., Seo D.-J., and Duan Q.-Y. Scale dependencies of hydrologic models to spatial variability of precipitation. Journal of Hydrology 217 (1999) 285-302
39. Leavesley G.H., and Stannard L.G. The precipitation-runoff modeling system-PRMS. In: Singh V. (Ed). Computer models of watershed hydrology (1995), Water Resource Publications, Littleton, Colorado 281-310
40. Liang X., Lettenmaier D.P., Wood E.F., and Burgs S.J. A simple hydrologicly based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for generation circulation models. Journal of Geophysical Research 99 (1994) 14415-14428
41. Lindsey S.D., and Farnsworth R.K. Sources of solar radiation estimates and their effect on daily potential evaporation for use in streamflow modeling. Journal of Hydrology 201 (1997) 348-366
42. Loagues K., and Kyriakisdis P.C. Spatial and temporal variability in the R-5 infiltration data set: Déjé vu and rainfall-runoff simulations. Water Resources Research 33 12 (1997) 2883-2895
43. Martinez J.E., Dunchon C.E., and Crosson W.L. Effect of the number of soil layers on a modeled surface water budget. Water Resources Research 37 2 (2001) 367-377
44. Merritt W.S., Letcher R.A., and Jakeman A.J. A review of erosion and sediment transport models. Environmental Modelling & Software 18 8-9 (2003) 761-799
45. Morton F.I. Evaporation research B a critical review and its lessons for the environmental sciences. Critical Reviews in Environment Science and Technology 24 3 (1994) 237-280
46. Mroczkowski M., Raper G.P., and Kuczera G. The quest for more powerful validation of conceptual catchment models. Water Resources Research 33 10 (1997) 2325-2335
47. Muleta M.K., and Nicklow J.W. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model. Journal of Hydrology 306 (2005) 127-145
48. Quinn P., Beven K., and Culf A. The introduction of macroscale hydrologic complexity into land surface-atmosphere transfer models and the effect on planetary boundary layer development. Journal of Hydrology 166 (1995) 421-444
49. Rango A. Application of remote sensing methods to hydrology and water resources. Hydrological Sciences Journal 39 4 (1994) 309-320
50. Rango A., and Shalaby A.I. Operational applications of remote sensing in hydrology: Success, prospects and problems. Hydrologic Sciences Journal 43 6 (1998) 947-968
51. Silberstein R.P., Sivapalan M., and Wyllie A. On the validation of a coupled water and energy balance model at small catchment scales. Journal of Hydrology 220 (1999) 149-168
52. Sugita M., Usui J., Tamagawa I., and Kaihotsu I. Complementary relationship with a convective boundary layer model to estimate regional evaporation. Water Resources Research 37 2 (2001) 353-365
53. US Department of Agriculture. (1994). State soil geographic (STATSGO) data base: Data use information. Miscellaneous Publication Number 1492. Fort Worth, Texas.
54. US Environmental Protection Agency. (2001). Better assessment science integrating point and nonpoint sources (BASINS) version 3.0 User's Manual. Office of Water EPA-823-B-01-001, Washington, DC.
55. Vachaud G., and Chen T. Sensitivity of a large-scale hydrologic model to quality of input data obtained at different scales; distributed versus stochastic non-distributed modeling. Journal of Hydrology 264 2002 (2002) 101-112
56. Valeo C., and Moin S.M.A. Hortonian and variable source area modeling in urbanizing basins. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 6 4 (2001) 326-335
57. Xu C.-Y., and Singh V.P. Dependence of evaporation on meteorological variables at different time-scales and intercomparison of estimation methods. Hydrologic Processes 12 (1998) 429-442
58. Yan J., and Haan C.T. Multiobjective parameter estimation for hydrologic models-weighting of errors. Transactions of the ASAE 34 1 (1991) 135-141