Invasive crayfish Orconectes neglectus threatens native crayfishes in the Spring River drainage of Arkansas and Missouri

Southeastern Naturalist

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 141-150

  Magoulick, Daniel D ^a   DiStefano, Robert J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^b MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASTACOIDEA; CAMBARUS HUBBSI; ORCONECTES EUPUNCTUS; ORCONECTES NEGLECTUS; ORCONECTES OZARKAE; ORCONECTES PUNCTIMANUS;

EID: 34247644360     PISSN: 15287092     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1656/1528-7092(2007)6[141:ICONTN]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adamski, J.C., J.C. Petersen, D.A. Freiwald, and J.V. Davis. 1995. Environmental and hydrologic setting of the Ozark Plateaus study unit, Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma. US Geological Survey, Little Rock, AR. Water-Resources Investigations report 94-4022.
2. Berrill, M. 1985. Laboratory-induced hybridization of two crayfish species, Orconectes rusticus and O.propinquus. Journal of Crustacean Biology 5:347-349.
3. Butler, M.J., and R.A. Stein. 1985. An analysis of the mechanisms governing species replacements in crayfish. Oecologia 66:168-177.
4. Capelli, G.M., and B.L. Munjal. 1982. Aggressive interactions and resource competition in relation to species displacement among crayfish of the genus Orconectes. Journal of Crustacean Biology 2:486-492.
5. Daniels, R.A., D.C. Murphy, and M.W. Klemens. 2001. Orconectes neglectus is established in the northeast. Northeastern Naturalist 8:93-100.
6. Flinders, C.A. 2000. The ecology of lotic-system crayfish in the Spring River watershed in northern Arkansas and southern Missouri. M.Sc. Thesis. University of Central Arkansas, Conway, AR.
7. Flinders, C.A. and D.D. Magoulick. 2007. Habitat use and selection within Ozark lotic crayfish assemblages: Spatial and temporal variation. Journal of Crustacean Biology 27: 242-254.
8. Flinders, C.A. and D.D. Magoulick. 2005. Distribution, habitat use, and life history of stream-dwelling crayfish in the Spring River drainage of Arkansas and Missouri with a focus on the Mammoth Spring crayfish (Orconectes marchandi). American Midland Naturalist 154:358-374.
9. Gamradt, S.C., L.B. Kats, and C.B. Anzalone. 1997. Aggression by non-native crayfish deters breeding in California newts. Conservation Biology 11:793-796.
10. Hill, A.M., and D.M. Lodge. 1994. Diel changes in resource demand: Competition and predation in species replacement among crayfishes. Ecology 75:2118-2126.
11. Hobbs III, H.H., J.P. Jass, and J.V. Huner. 1989. A review of global crayfish introductions, with particular emphasis on two North American species (Decapoda, Cambaridae). Crustaceana 56:299-316.
12. Lodge D.M., C.A Taylor., D.M. Holdich, and J. Skurdal. 2000. Nonindigenous crayfishes threaten North American freshwater biodiversity. Lessons from Europe. Fisheries 25:7-20.
13. Mather, M.E., and R.A. Stein. 1993. Direct and indirect effects of fish predation on the replacement of a native crayfish by an invading congener. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50:1279-1288.
14. Missouri Natural Heritage Program. 2006. Missouri species and communities of conservation concern checklist. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, MO.
15. Momot, W.T. 1996. History of the range extension of Orconectes rusticus into northwestern Ontario and Lake Superior. Freshwater Crayfish 11:61-72.
16. Olsen, T.M., D.M. Lodge, G.M. Capelli, and R.J. Houlihan. 1991. Mechanisms of impact of an introduced crayfish (Orconectes rusticus) on littoral congeners, snails, and macrophytes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48:1853-1861.
17. Perry, W.L., J.L. Feder, and D.M. Lodge. 2001. Implications of hydridization between introduced and resident Orconectes crayfishes. Conservation Biology 15:1656-1666.
18. Pflieger, W.L. 1996. The crayfishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, MO.
19. Rabalais, M.R., and D.D. Magoulick. 2006. Is competition responsible for species displacement? Native and invasive crayfish interactions. Biological Invasions.
20. Riggert, C.M., R.J. Distefano, and D.B. Noltie. 1999. Distributions and selected aspects of the life histories and habitat associations of the crayfishes Orconectes peruncus (Creaser, 1931) and O. quandruncus (Creaser, 1933) in Missouri. American. Midland Naturalist 142:348-362.
21. Simberloff, D. 1998. Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: Is single-species management passe in the landscape era? Biological Conservation 83:247-257.
22. Soderback, B. 1992. Predator avoidance and vulnerability of two co-occurring crayfish species, Astacus astacus (L.) and Pacifastacus leniusculus (Dana.). Annales Zoologici Fennici 29:253-259
23. Soule, M.E., and K.A. Kohm. 1989. Research Priorities for Conservation Biology. Island Press, Washington, DC.
24. Stein, R.A., and J.J. Magnuson. 1976. Behavioral response of crayfish to a fish predator. Ecology 57:751-761.
25. Taylor, C.A., M.L. Warren, Jr., J.F. Fitzpatrick, Jr., H.H. Hobbs III, R.F. Jezerinac, W.L. Pflieger, and H. Robison. 1996. Conservation status of crayfishes of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 21:25-38.