Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A prospective randomized trial

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 245, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 692-698

  Peng, Shu You ^a,b   Wang, Jian Wei ^a   Lau, Wan Yee ^c   Cai, Xiu Jun ^b   Mou, Yi Ping ^b   Liu, Ying Bin ^a   Li, Jiang Tao ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; BINDING PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVENTIONAL PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PANCREAS CANCER; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZATION;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; COMMON BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS; DUODENAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMORS; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PANCREATICOJEJUNOSTOMY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34247642728     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000255588.50964.5d     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Shrikehande SV, Qureshi SS, Rajneesh N, et al. Pancreatic anastomoses after pancreaticoduodenectomy: do we need further studies. World J Surg. 2005;29:1642-1649.
2. Talamini MA, Moesinger RC, Pitt HA, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater, a 28 year experience. Ann Surg. 1997;225:590-600.
3. Miedema BW, Sarr MG, van Heerdeen JA, et al. Complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy: current management. Arch Surg. 1992;127:945-950.
4. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, et al. Six hundred fifty consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies in the 1990s: pathology, complications, and outcomes. Ann Surg. 1997;226:248-260.
5. Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138:8-13.
6. Buechler MW, Friess H, Wagner M, et al. Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg. 2000;87:833-839.
7. Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Mokadam NA, et al. Prospective trial of a blood supply-based technique of pancreaticojejunostomy: effect on anastomotic failure in the Whipple procedure. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;197:746-758.
8. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1128-1137.
9. Peng SY, Mou YP, Cai XJ, et al. Binding pancreaticojejunostomy is a new technique to minimize leakage. Am J Surg. 2002;183:283-285.
10. Peng SY, Mou YP, Liu YB, et al. Binding pancreaticojejunostomy: 150 consecutive cases without leakage. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7:898-901.
11. Shyr YM, Su CH, Wu CW, et al. Does drainage fluid amylase reflect pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg. 2003;27:607-610.
12. van Berge Henegourven MI, de Wit LT, van Gulik TM, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy; drainage versus resection of the pancreatic remnant. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185:18-25.
13. Hamanaka Y, Nishihara K, Hamasaki T, et al. Pancreatic juice output after pancreaticoduodenectomy in relation to pancreatic consistency, duct size, and leakage. Surgery. 1996;119:281-287.
14. Ishikawa O, Ohigashi H, Imaoka S, et al. Concomitant benefit of preoperative irradiation in preventing pancreas fistula formation after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Arch Surg. 1991;126:885-889.
15. Al-Sharaf C, Ishes I, Dawiskiba S, et al. Characteristics of the gland remnant predict complications after subtotal pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg. 1997;14:101-106.
16. Sato N, Yamaguchi K, Chijiiwa K, et al. Risk analysis of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Arch Surg. 1998;133:1094-1098.
17. Marcus SG, Cohen H, Ranson JHC. Optimal management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1995;221:635-648.
18. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Maher MM, et al. A prospective randomized trial of pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1995;222:580-588; discussion 588-592.
19. Sung JP, Steward RD, O'Hara VS, et al. A study of forty-nine consecutive Whipple resections for periampullary adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 1997;174:6-10.
20. Aston SJ, Longmire WP Jr. Management of the pancreas after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg. 1974;179:322-327.
21. Roder JD, Stein HJ, Bottcher KA, et al. Stented versus nonstented pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective study. Ann Surg. 1999;1:41-48.
22. Grobmyer SR, Rivadenera DE, Goodman CA, et al. Pancreatic anastomotic failure after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am J Surg. 2000;180:117-120.
23. Bai MD, Peng SY, Liu YB, et al. Wound healing after pancreaticojejunostomy in piglets: a comparison between two anastomotic methods. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2003;41:458-461.