Public policy, agricultural resources and rural geography: Critical reflections over two decades of research in Great Britain;Políticapública, (AGRO) ambiente y geografía rural: Reflexiones críticas sobre dos décadas de investigación en gran Bretaña

Boletin de la Asociacion de Geografos Espanoles

Volumn , Issue 41, 2006, Pages 15-38

  Morris, Carol ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Agri environment policy; Public policy; Rural geography; Shallow and deep policy analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247640332     PISSN: 02129426     EISSN: 26053322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. BAGER, T. y PROOST, J. (1997): Voluntary regulation and farmers' environmental behaviour in Denmark and the Netherlands. Sociologia Ruralis. 37 (1), pp. 79-96.
2. BALDOCK, D., COX, G., LOWE, P. y WINTER, M. (1990): Environmentally Sensitive Areas: incrementalism or reform? Journal of Rural Studies, 6, pp. 143-62.
3. BANKS, M. y MACKIAN, S. (2000): Jump in! The water's warm; a comment on Peck's 'grey geography', Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 25, pp. 249-54.
4. BARNETT, C. (1998): The cultural worm turns: fashion or progress in human geography? Antipode 30, 379-94.
5. BATTERSHILL, M. y GILG, A. (1996): Traditional farming and agro-environment policy in Southwest England: back to the future? Geoforum, 27 (2), pp. 133-47.
6. BATTERSHILL, M. y GILG, A. (1997): Socio-economic constraints and environmentally friendly farming in the Southwest of England. Journal of Rural Studies, 13, pp. 213-228.
7. BEEDELL, J. y REHMAN, T. (2000): Using social-psychology models to understand farmers' conservation behaviour. Journal of Rural Studies, 16, pp. 117-127.
8. BOWLER, I. (1979): Government and Agriculture: A Spatial Perspective. Longman, London.
9. BOWLER, I. y ILBERY, B. (1987): Redefining agricultural geography. Area 19, pp. 327-332.
10. BROTHERTON, I. (1990): Initial participation in UK set-aside and ESA schemes. Planning Outlook, 33(1), pp. 46-61.
11. BROTHERTON, I. (1991): What limits participation in ESAs? Journal of Environmental Management, 32, pp. 241-249.
12. BULLER, H. y MORRIS, C. (2004): Growing goods: the market, the state and sustainable food production. Environment and Planning A, 36, pp. 1065-84.
13. BURGESS, J. (2000): Situating knowledges, sharing values and reaching collective decisions. The cultural turn in environmental decision making, in Cook, I., Crouch, D., Naylor, S., Ryan, J. (eds), Cultural Turns / Geographical Turns. Pearson Education, Harlow, pp. 273-87.
14. BURGESS, J., CLARK, J. y HARRISON, C. (2000). Knowledges in action: an actor network analysis of a wetland agri-environment scheme. Ecological Economics, 35, pp. 119-132.
15. BURTON, R. (2004a): Reconceptualising the behavioural approach in agricultural studies: a socio-psychological perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 20, pp. 359-71.
16. BURTON, R. (2004b): Seeing through the 'good farmer's' eyes: towards developing an understanding of the social symbolic value of productivist behaviour. Sociologia Ruralis, 44(2), pp. 195-215.
17. CARR, S. y TAIT, J. (1991): Differences in the attitudes of farmers and conservationists and their implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 3, pp. 281-294.
18. CLARK, J. y JONES, A. (1998): Agricultural elites, agrarian beliefs, and their impact on the evolution of agri-environment policies: an examination of the British experience, 1981-92. Environment and Planning A, 30, pp. 2227-243.
19. CLARK, J., JONES, A., POTTER, C. y LOBLEY, M. (1997): Conceptualising the evolution of the European Union's agri-environment policy: a discourse approach. Environment and Planning A, 29, pp. 1869-1885.
20. CLARK, J. y LOWE, P. (1992): Cleaning up agriculture: environment, technology and social science. Sociologia Ruralis, 32 (1), pp. 11-29.
21. CLARK, J. y MURDOCH, J. (1997): Local knowledge and the precarious extension of scientific networks: a reflection on three case studies. Sociologia Ruralis, 37, pp. 38-60.
22. CLOKE, P. (1997): Country backwater to virtual village? Rural studies and 'the cultural turn'. Journal of Rural Studies 13, pp. 367-375.
23. CLOKE, P. y MOSELEY, M. (1990): Rural geography in Britain. In P. Lowe and M. Bodiguel (eds) Rural Studies in Britain and France. London: Belhaven, pp. 117-135.
24. COLEMAN, D., CRABTREE, B., FROUD, J. y O'CARROLL, L. (1992): Comparative Effectiveness of Conservation Mechanisms. Department of Agricultural Economics, Manchester University.
25. DORLING, D. y SHAW, M. (2002): Geographies of the agenda: public policy, the discipline and its (re)'turns'. Progress in Human Geography, 26 (5), pp. 629-646.
26. EDGELL, J. (2000): Consultation on the Countryside Premium Scheme: creating a 'market' for information. Journal of Rural Studies, 16, pp. 357-366.
27. EDGELL, J. y BADGER, R. (1996): A 'new political economy' perspective on Scottish agrienvironmental policy. Scottish Agricultural Economics Review, 9, pp. 21-33.
28. FALCONER, K. (2000): Farm-level constraints on agri-environmental scheme participation: a transactional perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 16, pp. 379-394.
29. FISH, R., SEYMOUR, S. y WATKINS, C. (2003): Conserving English landscapes: land managers and agri-environmental policy. Environment and Planning A, 35, pp. 19-41.
30. GASSON, R. y POTTER, C. (1988): Conservation through land diversion: a survey of farmers' attitudes. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 39, pp. 341-351.
31. GOURLAY, D. y SLEE, B. (1988): Public preferences for landscape features: a case study of two Scottish Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 14 (2), pp. 249-63.
32. HANLEY, N., WHITBY, M. y SIMPSON, I. (1999): Assessing the success of agri-environmental policy in the UK. Land Use Policy, 16, pp. 67-80.
33. HARRISON, C., BURGESS, J. y CLARK, C. (1998): Discounted knowledges: farmers' and residents' understandings of nature conservation goals. Journal of Environmental Management, 54, pp. 305-320.
34. HART, K. y WILSON, G. (1998): UK implementation of agri-environment regulation 2078/92/EEC: enthusiastic supporter or reluctant participant? Landscape Research, 23 (3), pp. 255-72.
35. HARVEY, D. (1974): What kind of geography for what kind of public policy? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 63, pp. 18-24.
36. HOGGART, K. (1996): All washed up and nowhere to go? Public policy and geographical research. Progress in Human Geography, 20, pp. 110-22.
37. JONES, G. (1963): The diffusion of agricultural innovations. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 15, pp. 387-409.
38. LEE, R. (2002): Geography, policy and geographical agendas - a short intervention in a continuing debate. Progress in Human Geography, 26 (5), pp. 627-628.
39. LITTLE, J. (1999). Otherness, representation and the cultural construction of rurality. Progress in Human Geography 23, pp. 437-442.
40. LOBLEY, M. y POTTER, C. (1998): Environmental stewardship in UK agriculture: a comparison of the Environmentally Sensitive Area Programme and the Countryside Stewardship Scheme in South East England. Geoforum 29 (4), 413-432.
41. LOWE, P. y WARD, N. (1997): Field-level bureaucrats and the making of new moral discourses in agri-environmental controversies. In Goodman, D. and Watts, M. (eds.) Globalising Food: Agrarian Questions and Global Restructuring. Routledge, London, pp. 256-272.
42. LOWE, P., COX, G., MACEWAN, M., O'RIORDAN, T. y WINTER, M. (1986): Countryside Conflicts: the Politics of Farming, Forestry and Conservation. Temple Smith / Gower, London.
43. MACFARLANE, R. (1998): Implementing agri-environment policy: a landscape ecology perspective. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 41 (5), pp. 575-96.
44. MACFARLANE, R. (2000): Building blocks or stumbling blocks? Landscape ecology and farm-level participation in agri-environmental policy. Landscape Research, 25 (3), pp. 321-331.
45. MACNAUGHTON, P. y URRY, J. (1998): Contested Natures. Sage, London.
46. MARTIN, R. (2001) Geography and public policy: the case of the missing agenda. Progress in Human Geography, 25 (2), pp. 189-210.
47. MARTIN, R. (2002): A geography for policy, or a policy for geography? A response to Dorling and Shaw. Progress in Human Geography, 26 (5), pp. 642-644.
48. MASSEY, D. (2000): Editorial: practising political relevance. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 25, pp. 131-33.
49. MASSEY, D. (2002): Geography, policy and politics: a response to Dorling and Shaw. Progress in Human Geography, 26 (5), pp. 645-646.
50. MCEACHERN, C., (1992): Farmers and conservation: conflict and accommodation in farming politics. Journal of Rural Studies, 8, pp. 159-171.
51. MCHENRY, H. (1998): Wild flowers in the wrong fields are weeds! Examining farmers' constructions of conservation. Environment and Planning A 30, pp. 1039-1053.
52. MORRIS, C. (2000): Quality Assurance Schemes: A new way of delivering environmental benefits in food production? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43 (3), pp. 433-448.
53. MORRIS, C. (2004): Networks of agri-environmental policy implementation: a case study of England's Countryside Stewardship Scheme. Land Use Policy, 21, pp. 177-191.
54. MORRIS, C. (forthcoming): «We wanted to graze the ground closer than we were advised... but we came to an agreement»: negotiating the knowledge culture of agri-environment schemes. Geoforum.
55. MORRIS, C. y EVANS, N. (1999): Research on the geography of agricultural change: redundant or revitalised? Area, 31 (4), pp. 349-358.
56. MORRIS, C. y EVANS, N. (2004): Agricultural turns, geographical turns: retrospect and prospect. Journal of Rural Studies, 20 (1), pp. 95-111.
57. MORRIS, C. y POTTER, C. (1995): Recruiting the new conservationists: farmers' adoption of agri-environmental schemes in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies, 11 (1), pp. 51-63.
58. MORRIS, C. y YOUNG, C. (1997): Towards environmentally beneficial farming? an evaluation of the Countryside Stewardship Scheme. Geography, 82 (4), pp. 305-316.
59. MORRIS, J., MILLS, J. y CRAWFORD, I. (2000): Promoting farmer uptake of agri-environment schemes: the Countryside Stewardship Arable Options Scheme. Land Use Policy, 17, pp. 241-254.
60. MOSS, J.E. y CHILTON, S. M. (1990/91): Distinguishing characteristics of participating and non-participating landholders in the Mourne Mountains and Slieve Croob Environmentally Sensitive Area Scheme. The Journal of the Irish Planning Institute, 10, pp. 9-27.
61. NEWBY, H., BELL, C., SAUNDERS, P. y ROSE, D. (1977): Farmers attitudes to conservation. Countryside Recreation Review, 2, pp. 23-30.
62. PECK, J. (1999): Editorial: grey geography? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 24, pp. 131-35.
63. PECK, J. (2000): Jumping in, joining up and getting on. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 25, pp. 255-58.
64. POLLARD, J., HENRY, N., BRYSON, J. y DANIELS, P. (2000): Shades of grey? geographers and policy. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 25, pp. 243-48.
65. POTTER, C. (1988): Environmentally Sensitive Areas in England and Wales. Land Use Policy, 5, pp. 301-313.
66. POTTER, C. y GASSON, R. (1988a): Farmer participation in voluntary land diversion schemes. Journal of Rural Studies, 4, pp. 365-375.
67. PRIMDAHL, J. y HANSEN, B. (1993): Agriculture in Environmentally Sensitive Areas: implementing the ESA measure in Denmark. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 36, pp. 231-8.
68. ROCHE, M. (2002): Rural geography: searching rural geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 26 (6), pp. 823-829.
69. SKERRATT, S. y DENT, J. (1994): The challenge of agri-environmental subsidies: the case of Breadalbane Environmentally Sensitive Area, Scotland. Scottish Geographical Magazine, 112 (2), pp. 92-100.
70. VAN KOPPEN, K. (2000): Resource, arcádia, lifeworld. Nature concepts in environmental sociology. Sociologia Ruralis, 40, pp. 300-318.
71. WALSH, M. (1997): The view from the farm: farmers and agri-environmental schemes in the Yorkshire Dales. The North West Geographer, 1, pp. 24-35.
72. WHITBY, M. (1994): Incentives for Countryside Management: the Case of Environmentally Sensitive Areas. CAB International, Wallingford.
73. WHITBY, M. (2000): Reflections on the costs and benefits of agri-environment schemes. Landscape Research, 25 (3), pp. 365-374.
74. WILSON, G. (1996): Farmer environmental attitudes and ESA participation. Geoforum, 27, pp. 115-131.
75. WILSON, G. (1997a): Factors influencing farmer participation in the ESA scheme. Journal of Environmental Management, 50, pp. 67-93.
76. WILSON, G. (1997b): Assessing the environmental impact of the ESA Scheme: a case for using farmers' environmental knowledge? Landscape Research, 22 (3), pp. 303-326.
77. WILSON, G. y HART, K. (2000): Financial imperative or conservation concern? EU farmers' motivations for participation in voluntary agri-environmental schemes. Environment and Planning A, 32, pp. 2161-2185.
78. WILSON, G. y HART, K. (2001): Farmer participation in agri-environmental schemes: towards conservation-oriented thinking? Sociologia Ruralis, 41 (2), pp. 254-274.
79. WILSON, G., PETERSEN, J-E. y HOLL, A. (1999): EU member state responses to agrienvironment regulation 2078/92/EEC - towards a conceptual framework? Geoforum, 30, pp. 185-202.
80. WINTER, S. (1990) Integrating implementation research. In D. Palumbo and D. Calista (eds) Implementation and the Policy Process: Opening up the Black Box. Greenwood Press, Westport CT, pp. 19-38.
81. WOODS, M. (1997) Researching rural conflicts: hunting, local politics and actor-networks. Journal of Rural Studies. 14 (3), pp. 321-340.