Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the Cognitive Performance Scale (Minimum Data Set) and the Mini-Mental Scale Exam for the detection of cognitive impairment in nursing home residents

International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 286-293

  Paquay, Louis ^a   De Lepeleire, Jan ^a   Schoenmakers, Birgitte ^a   Ylieff, Michel ^b   Fontaine, Ovide ^b   Buntinx, Frank ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cognitive impairment; Mini Mental State Exam; Minimum Data Set; Resident Assessment Instrument; Sensitivity and specificity

Indexed keywords

AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MINI MENTAL STATE EXAMINATION; NURSING HOME; PREDICTION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COGNITION DISORDERS; DECISION MAKING; DEMENTIA; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HOMES FOR THE AGED; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL STATUS SCHEDULE; NETHERLANDS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; NURSING HOMES; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 34247636677     PISSN: 08856230     EISSN: 10991166     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/gps.1671     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Achterberg WP, van Campen C, Pot AM, et al. 1999. Effects of the Resident Assessment Instrument on the care process and health outcomes in nursing homes. A review of the literature. Scand J Rehabil Med 31: 131-137.
2. Arnaert A, Delesie L. 1999. Calibration of measurement data: the Belgian Institute of Health Insurance Index of ADL. [IJking van meetgegevens: RIZIV A.D.L.-index]. ACTA Hospitalia 39(4): 19-31.
3. Bravo G, Hébert R. 1997. Age- and education-specific reference values for the Mini-Mental and modified Mini-Mental State Examinations derived from a non-demented elderly population. Int J Geriat Psychiatry 12: 1008-1018.
4. Burns A, Lawlor B, Craig S. 1999. Assessment Scales in Old Age Psychiatry. Martin Dunitz: London.
5. Casten R, Lawton MP, Parmelee PA, Kleban MH. 1998. Psychometric Characteristics of the Minimum Data Set I: Confirmatory Factor Analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc 46: 726-735.
6. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. 1987. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 40: 373-383.
7. Crum RM, Anthony JC, Bassett SS, Folstein MF. 1993. Population-Based Norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by Age and Educational Level. JAMA 269: 2386-2391.
8. De Lepeleire J. 2000. The diagnosis of dementia. The role of the general practitioner [De diagnose van dementie. Het aandeel van de huisarts]. Doctoral thesis. Faculty of Medicine KULeuven, 2000.
9. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. 1975. 'Mini-Mental State': a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12: 189-198.
10. Gerritsen D, Oorns M, Steverink N, Frijters D. 2004. Drie nieuwe observatieschalen in het verpleeghuis: schalen uit het Resident Assessment Instrument voor Activiteiten van het Dagelijks Leven, Cognitie en Depressie. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 35: 55-64.
11. Grootjans F. 2000. MedCalc Version 6 [computer program]. Mariakerke, Belgium.
12. Habbema JDK, Eijkemans R, Krijnen P, Knottnerus JA. 2002. Analysis of data on the accuracy of diagnostic tests. In The Evidence Basis of Clinical Diagnosis, Knottnerus AJ (ed.). BMJ Books: London; 117-143.
13. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. 1983. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148: 839-843.
14. Hartmaier SL, Sloane PD, Guess HA, et al. 1995. Validation of the Minimum Data Set Cognitive Performance Scale: agreement with the Mini-Mental State Examination. J Gerontol 50A: M128-M133.
15. Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, et al. 1982. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J Pychiatry 140: 566-572.
16. Katz S, Ford A, Moskowitz R, et al. 1963. Studies of Illness in the Aged. JAMA 185: 914-919.
17. Ministry of Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment. 2006. Available at: https://portal.health.fgov.be/portal/ page?_pageid=56,512448&_dad=portal&_schema= PORTAL&ITEM_ID=4916387&SITE_ID=56&PAGE_ID= 512890&isportlet=true&p_security=ON.
18. Morris J. 1993. The CDR: current version and scoring rules. Neurology 43: 2412-2413.
19. Morris J, Fries BE, Mehr DR, et al. 1994. MDS Cognitive Performance Scale. J Gerontol 49: M174-M182.
20. Paquay L, De Lepeleire J, Schoenmakers B, et al. 2004. The Qualidem project in Belgium. A two-center study on care needs and provision in dementia care: inclusion criteria and description of the population. Arch Public Health 62: 125-142.
21. Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, et al. 1999. Mild Cognitive Impairment. Clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol 56: 303-308.
22. Roth M, Tym E, Mountjoy CQ, et al. 1986. CAMDEX - a standard instrument for the diagnosis of mental disorder in the elderly with special reference to the early detection of dementia. Br J Psychiatry 149: 698-709.
23. Schwartz A. 2005. Diagnostic Test Calculator. Available at: http://araw.mede.uic.edu/cgi-bin/testcalc.pl.
24. Sjöbeck B, Isacsson A. 1995. Ability of a trained primary healthcare nurse to discriminate dementia from other psychogeriatric disorders. Int Psychogeriatr 7: 9-16.
25. Snowden M, McCormick W, Russo J, et al. 1999. Validity and responsiveness of the Minimum Data Set. J Am Geriatr Soc 47: 1000-1004.
26. Tangalos EG, Smith GE, Ivnik RJ, et al. 1996. The Mini-Mental State Examination in general medical practice: clinical utility and acceptance. Mayo Clin Proc 71: 829-837.
27. Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. 1992. The Mini Mental State Examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc 40: 922-935.
28. Trapp-Moen B, Tyrey M, Cook G, et al. 2001. In-home assessment of dementia by nurses: experience using the CERAD evaluations. Gerontologist 41: 406-409.