Middle School Mathematics Curriculum Reform

Standards-Based School Mathematics Curricula: What are they? What do Students Learn?

Volumn , Issue , 2020, Pages 181-192

  Senk, Sharon L ^a   Thompson, Denisse R ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247633568     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781003064275-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42.
2. Brown, C. A., & Silver, E. A. (1989). Data organization and interpretation. In M. M. Lindquist (Ed.), Results from the fourth mathematics assessment of the national assessment of educational progress (pp. 28-34). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
3. Burger, W., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17, 31-48.
4. Carpenter, T. P., & Lindquist, M. M. (1989). Summary and conclusions. In M. M. Lindquist (Ed.), Results from the fourth mathematics assessment of the national assessment of educational progress (pp. 160-169). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
5. Case, R. (1988). Summary comments: Developing a research agenda for mathematics in the middle grades. In J. Hiebcrt & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 265-270). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Davis, R. (1986). The convergence of cognitive science and mathematics education. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 5, 321-335.
7. Dossey, J. A., Mullis, I. V. S., Lindquist, M. M., & Chambers, D. L. (1989). What can students do? (Levels of mathematics proficiency for the nation and demographic subgroups.) In M. M. Lindquist (Ed.), Results from the fourth mathematics assessment of the national assessment of educational progress (pp. 117—134). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
8. Flanders, J. R. (1987). How much of the content is new. Arithmetic Teacher, 55(1), 18-23.
9. Fuson, K. (1988). Summary comments: Meaning in middle grade number concepts. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 260-264). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Fuys, D., Geddes, D., & Tischler, R. (1988). The van Hiele model of thinking in geometry among adolescents. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education (Monograph Series No. 3). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
11. Hiebert, J., & Behr, M. (Eds.). (1988). Number concepts and operations in the middle grades. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 317-326.
13. Kouba, V. L., Carpenter, T. I’., & Swafford, J. O. (1989). Number and operations. In M. M. Lindquist (Ed.), Results from the fourth mathematics assessment of the national assessment of educational progress (pp. 64-93). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
14. Lesh, R., Post, T, & Behr, M. (1988). Proportional reasoning. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 260-264). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Lindquist, M. M., & Kouba, V L. (1989). Measurement. In M. M. Lindquist (Ed.), Results from the fourth mathematics assessment of the national assessment of educational progress (pp. 35-43). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
16. McKnight, C. C., Crosswhite, F. J., Dossey, J. A., Kifer, E., Swafford, J. O., Travers, K. J., & Cooney, T. J. (1987). The underachieving curriculum: Assessing U.S. school mathematics from an international perspective. Champaign, IL: Stipes.
17. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
18. National Research Council. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: Mathematical Sciences Education Board, National Research Council.
19. National Science Foundation. (1989). Materials for middle school mathematics instruction: Program solicitation. Washington, DC: Author.
20. Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: Plow schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21. Swafford, J. O., & Brown, C. A. (1989). Variables and relations. In M. M. Lindquist (Ed.), Results from the fourth mathematics assessment of the national assessment of educational progress (pp. 55-63). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
22. Usiskin, Z. (1987). Why elementary algebra can, should, and must be an eighth-grade course for average students. Mathematics Teacher, 80, 428-437.
23. Weiss, I. R. (1987). Report of the 1985-86 national survey of science and mathematics education. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
24. Wirszup, I., &.Streit, R. (Eds.). (1987). Developments in school mathematics education around the world. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.